From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>
To: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>,
Rajkumar Manoharan <rmanohar@codeaurora.org>,
Kan Yan <kyan@google.com>
Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] [RFC/RFT] mac80211: Switch to a virtual time-based airtime scheduler
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2019 16:45:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87va0x1g0j.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190215170512.31512-1-toke@redhat.com>
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> writes:
> This switches the airtime scheduler in mac80211 to use a virtual time-based
> scheduler instead of the round-robin scheduler used before. This has a
> couple of advantages:
>
> - No need to sync up the round-robin scheduler in firmware/hardware with
> the round-robin airtime scheduler.
>
> - If several stations are eligible for transmission we can schedule both of
> them; no need to hard-block the scheduling rotation until the head of the
> queue has used up its quantum.
>
> - The check of whether a station is eligible for transmission becomes
> simpler (in ieee80211_txq_may_transmit()).
>
> The drawback is that scheduling becomes slightly more expensive, as we need
> to maintain an rbtree of TXQs sorted by virtual time. This means that
> ieee80211_register_airtime() becomes O(logN) in the number of currently
> scheduled TXQs. However, hopefully this number rarely grows too big (it's
> only TXQs currently backlogged, not all associated stations), so it
> shouldn't be too big of an issue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
> ---
> This is basically the idea I mentioned earlier for a different way to
> handle the airtime scheduling.
>
> I've tested it on ath9k, where it achieves the same fairness and
> weighing properties as the old scheduler. It would be good if you could
> test it on your ath10k setup, Rajkumar; and all of you please comment on
> whether you agree that this is better from an API point of view.
So no one has any comments on this? :)
-Toke
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-05 15:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-15 17:05 Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-02-15 19:44 ` Dave Taht
2019-03-05 15:45 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
2019-03-06 23:09 ` Rajkumar Manoharan
2019-03-07 9:46 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-03-07 14:27 ` Felix Fietkau
2019-03-08 11:05 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-03-08 18:16 ` Felix Fietkau
2019-03-08 19:06 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-04-04 4:41 ` Yibo Zhao
2019-04-04 4:43 ` Yibo Zhao
2019-04-04 5:00 ` Yibo Zhao
2019-04-04 8:31 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-04-04 8:36 ` Dave Taht
2019-04-04 8:50 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-04-09 13:25 ` Yibo Zhao
2019-04-09 20:41 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-04-10 6:35 ` Yibo Zhao
2019-04-10 10:40 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-04-11 3:12 ` Yibo Zhao
2019-04-11 11:24 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-04-12 6:34 ` Yibo Zhao
2019-04-19 15:05 ` Yibo Zhao
2019-04-20 21:15 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-04-30 9:45 ` Yibo Zhao
2019-04-30 10:39 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/make-wifi-fast.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87va0x1g0j.fsf@toke.dk \
--to=toke@redhat.com \
--cc=kyan@google.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=nbd@nbd.name \
--cc=rmanohar@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox