From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-it0-x22a.google.com (mail-it0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EEF23B29E for ; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 22:49:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-it0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id o200so24656417itg.0 for ; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 19:49:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language; bh=ZuFaUzrEYyckK7crcrkqjsH1PXTLdbozjtInTUYsIUE=; b=MKwpfPhj7hk13yAvPPcs+ro9KF5RIwZ+0LN958R8Q+UTmq2GwE5d4E++RdHPSr5Heq SQMJpVQ8uQNbxA/Ee25FxqVID5qfChJK9Q14YUUnNXWr96xCvgUOCWhTxZlDTM2CwEv4 PBFckVl92Qllrs7NhWW24dU+y4w+HilORJ5qT1xQdngCrN1wTN2DGVsKOosA59ZtDT1f MUqfiT22sirP2y150I4iK3PpXuVRjUYTn3MpKuXKQQkdndXFVoitmRhrIUaxdhAmodK8 bO0iO189TY/lmPRP5ATTOtEXFxCvKZWN47ZuJs882wsi/RrZNdcDD4jJJyfScCbHCI2K 3bSw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=ZuFaUzrEYyckK7crcrkqjsH1PXTLdbozjtInTUYsIUE=; b=rarhYdvVb8gUKWp0j+9hSF5BJzP+Fz5U0uTFXR7k9+6GGwJkA4eGXv5fHzV7ZH91sh nCkqyP7EXj7O/xwFWpVckS0deH3Jb7onbdz1INhcQkEv+f/t5o5icUIwFlW2671tnqeF JH5ghGFJ2xxBon+HG7lkhjTZP5MpGN5BLZoyoOevJ9mTmqZoa1VqMTPQfKHSeXYkKfGR Awt9DeuT7xE5POVcQR0nvKauuIadmUbZLIDQlvBtmGDV3oYR0NdAEwf/1hSOmtLKeRXK Kxs55Z3dR2GXxAZIJ3M2wGagQkKr1uzpUC9DhwVZ03mV3Uo6zmDdhSr58QTEC4xaj28v CHPQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUj1GpfGKl3XTASHZCsvNnUXWPY0MMwy0NyXeeLNfT958Jw0z/AZ kbGrYPOxldrdndKlU7k= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QDFVvPSY1EtN0Gq6edK19vWZUw++e+7kbV8XpNxICY/thM2VbhvAJvrhyBFX4o/lHB2wK5D1g== X-Received: by 10.36.228.5 with SMTP id o5mr18087898ith.116.1505184547115; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 19:49:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2601:404:300:fdea:cf4:4788:dec8:d322? ([2601:404:300:fdea:cf4:4788:dec8:d322]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m20sm5592625itm.19.2017.09.11.19.49.06 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 11 Sep 2017 19:49:06 -0700 (PDT) To: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net References: From: Noah Causin Message-ID: <9bce50b9-5975-1fce-d73b-695e37e7cb1f@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 22:49:05 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------68E70B93668FF95A4F5807F2" Content-Language: en-US Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] Upstream Ath10k FQ_Codel Patch? X-BeenThere: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 02:49:08 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------68E70B93668FF95A4F5807F2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit My Archer C7 v2 says Qualcomm Atheros QCA9880. I checked using iperf3, and it says about 40 mbps. I remember getting at least 70mbps. I copied Toke's patch to a new build about a month ago, when I redid my WiFi.  Maybe it broke some time ago. I had been using up to date versions of that patch for months. Noah On 9/11/2017 4:12 PM, Jon Pike wrote: > Hmmm, again... > > Doesn't the C7 have the QCA9880?  Noah,  what kind of speed do you get > on yours? > > I just checked the OpenWRT hardware page...   Seems it does. Checked > the C2600,  it says it does,  but not which dash number version of the > chip, if that makes any difference. > > I would have guessed that if you only got 4-6Mbit on it, you wouldn't > consider it working, really...   so interested in hearing if Noah is > seeing normal speeds somehow. > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Adrian Popescu ? > To: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" > > Cc: Jon Pike >, > make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net > > Bcc: > Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 15:30:47 +0300 > Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] Make-wifi-fast Digest, Vol 29, Issue 1 > We need to put some pressure on QCA to add push-pull support to the > firmware. This is MU-MIMO capable hardware which should be able to > handle push-pull without breaking a sweat. > > I have tested this on a brand new Archer C2600. > > On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen > wrote: > > Adrian Popescu > writes: > > > >> QCA9980 gets 2-6 Mbps with this patch. I was able to get up to 400-500 > >> Mbps without the patch. > >> > >> The QCA9980 firmware doesn't have push-pull support. > > > > Ah, bugger. Guess we'll have to drop it, then. Which device is this in? > > > > -Toke > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" > > To: Adrian Popescu > > Cc: Jon Pike >, > make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net > > Bcc: > Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 14:34:21 +0200 > Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] Make-wifi-fast Digest, Vol 29, Issue 1 > Adrian Popescu > writes: > > > We need to put some pressure on QCA to add push-pull support to the > > firmware. This is MU-MIMO capable hardware which should be able to > > handle push-pull without breaking a sweat. > > > > I have tested this on a brand new Archer C2600. > > There's new hardware shipping without this feature? WTF? > > Putting pressure on QCA is all well and good, but unfortunately it's not > something we've had a lot of luck with so far :/ > > -Toke > > _______________________________________________ > Make-wifi-fast mailing list > Make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net > > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/make-wifi-fast > > > > _______________________________________________ > Make-wifi-fast mailing list > Make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/make-wifi-fast --------------68E70B93668FF95A4F5807F2 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

My Archer C7 v2 says Qualcomm Atheros QCA9880.

I checked using iperf3, and it says about 40 mbps.

I remember getting at least 70mbps.

I copied Toke's patch to a new build about a month ago, when I redid my WiFi.  Maybe it broke some time ago.

I had been using up to date versions of that patch for months.

Noah


On 9/11/2017 4:12 PM, Jon Pike wrote:
Hmmm, again...

Doesn't the C7 have the QCA9880?  Noah,  what kind of speed do you get on yours?

I just checked the OpenWRT hardware page...   Seems it does.  Checked the C2600,  it says it does,  but not which dash number version of the chip, if that makes any difference.

I would have guessed that if you only got 4-6Mbit on it, you wouldn't consider it working, really...   so interested in hearing if Noah is seeing normal speeds somehow.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Adrian Popescu <adriannnpopescu@gmail.com?
To: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>
Cc: Jon Pike <jonpike54@gmail.com>, make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net
Bcc: 
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 15:30:47 +0300
Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] Make-wifi-fast Digest, Vol 29, Issue 1
We need to put some pressure on QCA to add push-pull support to the
firmware. This is MU-MIMO capable hardware which should be able to
handle push-pull without breaking a sweat.

I have tested this on a brand new Archer C2600.

On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk> wrote:
> Adrian Popescu <adriannnpopescu@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> QCA9980 gets 2-6 Mbps with this patch. I was able to get up to 400-500
>> Mbps without the patch.
>>
>> The QCA9980 firmware doesn't have push-pull support.
>
> Ah, bugger. Guess we'll have to drop it, then. Which device is this in?
>
> -Toke




---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>
To: Adrian Popescu <adriannnpopescu@gmail.com>
Cc: Jon Pike <jonpike54@gmail.com>, make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net
Bcc: 
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 14:34:21 +0200
Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] Make-wifi-fast Digest, Vol 29, Issue 1
Adrian Popescu <adriannnpopescu@gmail.com> writes:

> We need to put some pressure on QCA to add push-pull support to the
> firmware. This is MU-MIMO capable hardware which should be able to
> handle push-pull without breaking a sweat.
>
> I have tested this on a brand new Archer C2600.

There's new hardware shipping without this feature? WTF?

Putting pressure on QCA is all well and good, but unfortunately it's not
something we've had a lot of luck with so far :/

-Toke

_______________________________________________
Make-wifi-fast mailing list
Make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/make-wifi-fast


_______________________________________________
Make-wifi-fast mailing list
Make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/make-wifi-fast

--------------68E70B93668FF95A4F5807F2--