From: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>
To: Michael Yartys <michael.yartys@protonmail.com>,
Michael Yartys via Make-wifi-fast
<make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] Higher latency on upload under poor signal conditions
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 13:08:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <C47324BE-1A4E-4C69-B0AB-7F896CE5DD17@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <mailman.581.1592302723.24343.make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1959 bytes --]
Hi Michael,
> On Jun 16, 2020, at 12:18, Michael Yartys via Make-wifi-fast <make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
>
>
> From: Michael Yartys <michael.yartys@protonmail.com>
> Subject: Higher latency on upload under poor signal conditions
> Date: June 16, 2020 at 12:18:38 GMT+2
> To: "make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net" <make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net>
> Reply-To: Michael Yartys <michael.yartys@protonmail.com>
>
>
> Hi
>
> I decided to run some 8-stream TCP tests at the edge of the range of my WiFi network, and I noticed that I get higher latency when I run an upload compared to a download. The latency when downloading is pretty steady at right above 30 ms, and when I run the upload it hovers around 80-100 ms. I think I know why this happens, but I would like to read the opinion of the mailing list.
My naive guess would be that air-time fairness by the AP only directly affects the AP's own transmissions, the stations will in all likelihood not have an fq_codel instance in its wifi-stack (I could be wrong, but I do not believe that the 7260ac intel card actually uses airtime fairness yet/at all). So the 80-100ms might just come from the default wifi parameters which typically are adjusted for peak thoughput instead of a balanced throughput latency under load set-point. Then again that is my _guess_, so Kruger-Dunning might apply.
Best Regards
Sebastian
>
> My test setup is a NETGEAR R7800 running OpenWrt with fq_codel'd WiFi and a laptop with an Intel 7260 ac wireless card. The laptop reports an average signal strength of about -77 dBm, while the router has a much harder time hearing the laptop at -98 dBm signal strength with a noise floor of -109 dBm.
>
> I suspect this extra latency is due to buffering because the laptop has to retransmit a lot of frames due to how poorly the router hears it. Is this correct?
>
> The associated flent files are attached.
>
> Michael
[-- Attachment #2: tcp_8up-2020-06-16T115109.277373.room_77dbm.flent.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 0 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #3: tcp_8down-2020-06-16T114107.429346.room_77dbm.flent.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 0 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #4: Type: text/plain, Size: 187 bytes --]
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Make-wifi-fast mailing list
> Make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/make-wifi-fast
next parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-16 11:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <mailman.581.1592302723.24343.make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net>
2020-06-16 11:08 ` Sebastian Moeller [this message]
2020-06-16 11:35 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-06-16 11:50 ` Sebastian Moeller
2020-06-16 12:03 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-06-16 12:59 ` Michael Yartys
[not found] ` <fQ-GV16qlgI6k9RiyhVFGrDkwkMvGYE6iQTc4H6y7a4I-HXZ4ZVYRit74qPpcDg8UQQENbp7lZwinIZLyKg_hPx1EArregrBxVSUZR2XdIE=@protonmail.com>
2020-06-16 13:06 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-06-16 13:14 ` Michael Yartys
2020-06-16 14:32 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-06-30 18:22 ` Michael Yartys
2020-07-01 11:41 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/make-wifi-fast.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=C47324BE-1A4E-4C69-B0AB-7F896CE5DD17@gmx.de \
--to=moeller0@gmx.de \
--cc=make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=michael.yartys@protonmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox