From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-x235.google.com (mail-wm0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5404B3B260 for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 01:22:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-wm0-x235.google.com with SMTP id v200so25546909wmv.1 for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 22:22:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tieto.com; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=PlFqQtA1UQjdtxmP6PiHSyXBythK4qyBCf6ApBqM0VI=; b=b0K5AtfAw1a2FlfofeDEPAx/6icPtKMSg5Cb5x7SXdXXdZGXkhG64jUqaPt1hnh1fz irEfpqzFZ3b2NODjdqP3+ZbzAHsHKd7ZXxQB6U53hTZkRTuDrJScfZkl5H6hWI/ZfcQP EmeaGbdJIi0rjUaaS8J/iOelmAF9GxCmMK6Qk= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=PlFqQtA1UQjdtxmP6PiHSyXBythK4qyBCf6ApBqM0VI=; b=LfphM2VUnAmumN9ZJQgLpBEM8MwdagolGuBnl+lGqJi/DvM9NVVencyw6WFlmgdeur UVmTn9SEzDtqu3qjez3HTR30pGyxMZlVBIth9WlanL6yxK6PPsr2zJ2DTYtrqgzJGwcG 2asOH0tQfdMsAS46RuvKYnhywLJUEuwn8xPfyzTDlBF86hr6yuRot7jy09y5A8fscXJs sTp2GTGK4rXWlHqbDaWCwjWj3kDY5AbRKy0cLHf5L3fyWIYMuui1SrgH6xk2dCu98UES mlpyuloe3IZQLho5VJ2DouEfsmgkDMrENR37xbWYiV72AkbNsIIVuDRnSLydwmHjX3Fe XHVA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FUjvb5IUdmjv5ndndyjBi/4FbS0f2eEqVvoHoaHRQPNxXFFig2Zjv9dqUBxe0Np2FKRAtpOUPll7Ik0NLY+WwR6k+xElE6gkVPnpCb7RFufTvE1aV16ABeRCUI+CLayOTKoX6jvkfjAtK9r0j8SpaCK2rUn5RPk7g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.28.0.87 with SMTP id 84mr21019906wma.68.1461734540460; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 22:22:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.104.105 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 22:22:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 07:22:20 +0200 Message-ID: From: Michal Kazior To: Dave Taht Cc: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-DomainID: tieto.com Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] ath10k+fq_codel+fqmac3.5 test kernel - woot! X-BeenThere: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 05:22:21 -0000 On 26 April 2016 at 22:03, Dave Taht wrote: > I got fqmac3.5 booted on the pcengines apu2d4 board and did do a few > tests at 2.4ghz at HT20 to start with. > > 1) Although the captures indicate CE is being asserted, the statistics > do not show that. > > root@apu2:/sys/kernel/debug/ieee80211/phy0# cat codel_ecn_mark > 0 Yeah. I've noticed that as well. The in-kernel codel.h does the ecn thing slightly differently compared to codel5.h. I didn't really look into it as my upload tests worked fine. > > 2) an upload test: http://blog.cerowrt.org/flent/fqmac35/latency_controll= ed.png > > I also tested a rrul_be test to the heavily optimized ath9k box I > have, it was pretty nice but still over 60ms. I have to figure out how > to go about a/b-ing stuff, I have a few more ath10k boards on order. > > 3) also, the packet capture was *perfect* - not a trace of loss. > really... don't need perfect! well, > I guess, for testing..... Interesting. Did codel_drop show anything? Micha=C5=82