From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qt0-x22c.google.com (mail-qt0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E97C13BA8E for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2018 18:23:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-qt0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id p23-v6so4312439qtn.6 for ; Tue, 05 Jun 2018 15:23:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0MEW6A8xUJWZpOnr7G3WqS5dZC5az7Jj6DmphxQkzCA=; b=QS9a63+QVw30UjNcV6XBrhT2DSL5SBTjkPaDGv6Ksom5AFPkx+OvSL+neLJ7mNZ76n yMGeNikrjonWOHMXM4wQx4YdFKzOsp9mKPdNup+kHHbFW7On3rxnaDbBHSIlGN2yS12V lpIKA3c9Re1jRm4rIGN3wUxi/nXTUYnHSumqd0avuBA8O11oaWcWpnK6BJbJPl/4Li2J jiX+LO02kr63cTZRvU+mVZpBKueOygKrpy9UYTVVnU051lFJv3wecWLRe3qTqpusLSVS j1ncBf6PCKhJ1x4+OvPYsAxE0BBRyjxZ500wyfoOZrECECYR6V7Qu6PB/IYCqos57Snl ZdIw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0MEW6A8xUJWZpOnr7G3WqS5dZC5az7Jj6DmphxQkzCA=; b=jxLQ6xOLe+LZrEOegXBJqcaoISrHzm7xK+ToM+61dH702CYzRFdrV9zxHemD+bTLYc 66wU1Ts6KUg0lMoL9VamQqleZ7V6zaNyPab6uusaFZ1ctnLqQf9JY28EAWSVIjS157BT 4YsP6HeV/VgZGD6LUEZim4CS1msYnKrLHIQ5wihpP4u5+tpHs0OlvZTn6FVKmHRdTCaS k8EdjFPwLGaGO+rBeQb7auTjnrzSaEACL/OOcLla2qxy8bw9dwYcoMw9ESvrVtGgtKLx Gwe75vCDZpV1oH1Fvz00f/9CwdKPFigERUdH/PIvTyqwvWrdf2frJUtEvIpWfAe7OLpI rIdg== X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E0tVc5MG6JY1XzbjOR2SrO/vWN6G1Olsx46tHDqOyLS+BUIHkDl wogOsOgRemi6njCjcEioIPMe6pfad8vK6/yCcjE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKJzTbcaBDKw2dzXnkwcuZJp5hvLmkxbYik3lQOAub7EocRqrt0lBAV6CTioCgSpkfN7YyE0XW+eRcajxdjAHV8= X-Received: by 2002:ac8:2809:: with SMTP id 9-v6mr544460qtq.104.1528237383477; Tue, 05 Jun 2018 15:23:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:aed:24f0:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Jun 2018 15:23:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87y3fsevrv.fsf@toke.dk> References: <87y3fsevrv.fsf@toke.dk> From: Dave Taht Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2018 15:23:02 -0700 Message-ID: To: =?UTF-8?B?VG9rZSBIw7hpbGFuZC1Kw7hyZ2Vuc2Vu?= Cc: Make-Wifi-fast Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] I have no idea how this got published... X-BeenThere: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2018 22:23:04 -0000 well, are the results correct? On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 3:03 PM, Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen wrote: > https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=3D8359288 > > They change buffer sizes (but dynamically!) and manage to do better than > Linux with CoDel and PIE as qdiscs on the WiFi interface. Linux 3.17.7, > that is. This was published today... > > What's worse is that they actually cite our paper, with this comment: > >> Recently, H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen et al. [20] also tackled bufferblo= at in >> APs with the goal to reduce latency and improve airtime fairness. >> Their proposal was built on top of FQ-CoDel which is one of the >> queuing disciplines in Linux. We believe that the mesh environment >> imposes further challenges that are not addressed in this work. > > I am mildly outraged... > > -Toke > _______________________________________________ > Make-wifi-fast mailing list > Make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/make-wifi-fast --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht CEO, TekLibre, LLC http://www.teklibre.com Tel: 1-669-226-2619