flent -H $S --socket-stats -x --step-size=.05 -t 1-flow-fq_starlink_noecn-${M}-c
c=${CC} --te=cpu_stats_hosts=$R --te=netstat_hosts=$R -4 --te=qdisc_stats_hosts=
$RS --te=qdisc_stats_interfaces=$RV --te=upload_streams=1 --te=cc_algo=$CC tcp_1
up
pic below
Yes, BBR includes mechanisms to deal with this kind of jitter. Please see the March 2019 thread on this topic:https://groups.google.com/g/bbr-dev/c/kBZaq98xCC4Our experience is that BBR's throughput on high-jitter links (cellular, wifi, DOCSIS, datacenter ethernet w/ GRO/LRO) is quite good at this point (usually matches CUBIC), and there are others who have documented this as well, e.g.:best,nealOn Sun, Jul 4, 2021 at 8:53 AM Eric xu <ericb...@gmail.com> wrote:Hello, dear friends. I wonder there is any optimization to BBR , for the reason of BBR low bandwidth utilization in wireless network with high delay jitter. In my opinion, High delay jitter will cause BBR to underestimate the BDP, thus limit the send rate even if pipeline is not full. Right?So, I wonder, if there is any optimization to improve bw utilization in wireless network with high delay jitter, even in 5G network? Thx a lot.--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BBR Development" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bbr-dev+u...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bbr-dev/bc675976-45f5-4ef6-b337-e693e4d21c6en%40googlegroups.com.