From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-it0-x231.google.com (mail-it0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A09F83B25E for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 21:08:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-it0-x231.google.com with SMTP id n75so18398315ith.1 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 18:08:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=NakSjjOPFE3rWBr9iawdilup0hSEgjdJQvWi57XcQL4=; b=Hw9T1/Dt+csv66ZsLUVGSn3QVq8LMwcH+WmM0qYwb/eUiHroQcWVcXbsGxEBGPMxj1 0bh5ejfXEHNkHVLaMDfbn5e2SHp0GRSt9BFEIanno/jfxWWsHMpXtEh8x5ogfwjc938N kZ0VCqGP/XgSl+JKGfuXDdkuIO4IfYuBrxCG6dbIqpkEE2XU8s7Nx1RHsJpVYkY7ysSZ 3+zINv5XswGrBj/grkQ/nqRBP1IiRu6QJuUMawRSus7VX9ySC4GH4ylfedF37Rl3fSGu z+xExtgGBQDklOwV3QW+jAhAgPib8uzW0z8y/DzwFnE1MzAY3dWOToK4IYBowt0pgIPv WYYA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=NakSjjOPFE3rWBr9iawdilup0hSEgjdJQvWi57XcQL4=; b=ABq+0zoin0Zx0jFLhkwTsCN55vMdL/CB54lDRB59c7ZVlTLLFhuj1sIOa7Utx08Skd r53ytXQGf6t7H547N2rpF4c7TK4hX4H8wzJ95l35vyZb57CHtOk4gJg/pYwH51IXT11v fbalx07nuMzcD+K+DABkIeEnmsX1cAj1kyqX9vsGekFd56YgEXYhsTL49AhtviVVxlwU woVORggax0G4g4ngUXf7bHlYGGDB8YawVNid8moQSe8KyT/Gr5Oi5HKP3PJp3AkY+rzD Qv+trauaII0ui6l9nCg0rodMexJ4B/IrML+hXGUiVau+FdEmCu4k9P3gFC4r7nVQMKmR TB9A== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwPCUSkTh8A6done1KcZHsaCK5w5CcpBMYgkg1E0ITRdSyCuuQsm0E29uenNCnxsjBTGxfoli/SC0fLzQA== X-Received: by 10.36.20.204 with SMTP id 195mr26936592itg.83.1472605733076; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 18:08:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.36.13.200 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 18:08:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1ba8a594-b061-8bc1-2ad8-b66362137776@gmail.com> References: <9c57d85b-99a0-8dbd-a32e-6af9f5c95787@gmail.com> <874m63ju2g.fsf@toke.dk> <8d19c536-ae4a-e383-71e7-eeaafcba05d8@gmail.com> <874m639tao.fsf@toke.dk> <87h9a2pm5q.fsf@toke.dk> <3610bb06-d292-424c-5181-03dbcf3f41e0@gmail.com> <87lgzecf86.fsf@toke.dk> <1ba8a594-b061-8bc1-2ad8-b66362137776@gmail.com> From: Dave Taht Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 18:08:52 -0700 Message-ID: To: Richard Smith Cc: =?UTF-8?B?VG9rZSBIw7hpbGFuZC1Kw7hyZ2Vuc2Vu?= , make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] Testing the LEDE nbd/staging branch X-BeenThere: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 01:08:53 -0000 On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 6:07 PM, Richard Smith wrote: > On 08/30/2016 01:56 PM, Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen wrote: > >> >>> I only have before/after work to test so it may take a day or 2 to go >>> though all the combinations. >> >> >> No worries. Just holler when you know more :) > > > Seems it's actually not specific to the staging branch and apparently I'm > not good at remembering what my baseline AP is. :) > > Baseline is running dd r40727 and not cc like I thought. > > Anyway it happens on both staging and baseline but just seems to be much > less frequent on r40727 than on the staging build. Small sample size bia= s I > think. > > I'll try out the AP's at work tomorrow and see if it happens there as wel= l. > > -- > Richard A. Smith Yay! If you have some other client chipset to test with? I'd like to see iwl in particular put through a wringer.... --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht Let's go make home routers and wifi faster! With better software! http://blog.cerowrt.org