[Make-wifi-fast] Fwd: [Cerowrt-devel] [Ow-tech] Open secure wireless

[Make-wifi-fast] Fwd: [Cerowrt-devel] [Ow-tech] Open secure wireless

[Dave Taht]

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Ranganathan Krishnan <rk@selwastor.com>
Date: Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 3:31 PM
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [Ow-tech] Open secure wireless
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>, Mitar <mmitar@gmail.com>,
Christopher Byrd <chris@riosec.com>
Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>




We have Chris Byrd from Riosec on the ow-tech mailing list. Check
out this thread from him last year :

https://lists.eff.org/pipermail/ow-tech/2014-May/000031.html

I have this feature enabled on the Openwireless APs. What is needed
is a campaign with the Client manufactureres (Google, Cyanogen,
Apple etc) to get them to fix the bugs in their implementation that
cause their clients to abort if no client certificate is installed -- even
though the connection would succeed since the server will never
request the client cert.

If there is interest in sustaining such a campaign with the Client
manufacturers, I will be happy to contribute.

Cheers,
Ranga




On Jun 17, 2015, at 8:47 AM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:

> In the alphabet soup of wireless standards, I had not heard of 802.11u
> before now.
>
> http://www.riosec.com/articles/open-secure-wireless-20
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Mitar <mmitar@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 4:29 AM
> Subject: [Ow-tech] Open secure wireless
> To: ow-tech@lists.eff.org
>
>
> Hi!
>
> Reading this old post:
>
> https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2011/04/open-wireless-movement
>
> I wanted to point some research done on this some time ago:
>
> http://www.riosec.com/articles/Open-Secure-Wireless
> http://www.riosec.com/articles/Open-Secure-Wireless/Open-Secure-Wireless.pdf
>
> And also some progress:
>
> http://www.riosec.com/articles/open-secure-wireless-20
>
> If you are not doing that already, I think EFF should get on board of
> supporting those changes to the standard.
>
> (BTW, originally, as presented in 1.0 paper, WiFi standard does allow
> open and secure connections, just no operating system really
> implements it because they all first prompt for the password, before
> trying to connect to the encrypted WiFi network to figure out the
> password is really required.)
>
>
> Mitar
>
> --
> http://mitar.tnode.com/
> https://twitter.com/mitar_m
> _______________________________________________
> Ow-tech mailing list
> Ow-tech@lists.eff.org
> https://lists.eff.org/mailman/listinfo/ow-tech
>
>
> --
> Dave Täht
> What will it take to vastly improve wifi for everyone?
> https://plus.google.com/u/0/explore/makewififast
> _______________________________________________
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel



-- 
Dave Täht
worldwide bufferbloat report:
http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/results/bufferbloat
And:
What will it take to vastly improve wifi for everyone?
https://plus.google.com/u/0/explore/makewififast