Lets make wifi fast again!
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: Bob McMahon <bob.mcmahon@broadcom.com>
Cc: David Lang <david@lang.hm>,
	Make-Wifi-fast <make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: [Make-wifi-fast] deep wifi
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 19:14:51 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw5MkZjuQGnMdmkn1DehpoX-UJTqu6EYDH38zM2dkrFLGQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHb6Lvpe=2Qk2TOJUbMxGYw69Zo2UgKFbr=ER55NUeQY3S+iLw@mail.gmail.com>

taking all the other lists off the cc.

and changing the thread title to something else that's less depressing.

On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 6:56 PM Bob McMahon <bob.mcmahon@broadcom.com> wrote:
>
> Hmm, not sure I understand the distinction.   CTS per the AP informs those other transmitters to stay quiet per the CTS NAV.  I may be misunderstanding things.  Thanks for the continued discussions.  It helps to better thoroughly understand the issues.
>
> Bob
>
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2018, 6:52 PM David Lang <david@lang.hm> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 27 Aug 2018, Bob McMahon wrote:
>>
>> > I thought that RTS/CTS would handle the case of hidden nodes, i.e. a device
>> > that fails to successfully transmit can resort to RTS/CTS to get the
>> > receiver to reserve time for it.  Also, lack of a RX ack seems ok to
>> > trigger MAC level retransmits.
>>
>> the problem isn't getting the receiver to reserve time for it, it's getting the
>> other transmitter(s) to not step on it when it transmits. Those other
>> transmitters may belong to different people, sharing a channel with your system
>> and nothing else.
>>
>> David Lang
>>
>> > It seems the LBT bug is the collision avoidance overheads when it isn't
>> > needed, i.e. no other energy would cause the RX PHY to fail its decode and
>> > the EDCA backoffs had no benefit, stochastic or otherwise.   Optimizing
>> > that out is said to be not possible from local information only and per
>> > "shared" spectrum.
>> >
>> > Bob
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 3:33 PM David Lang <david@lang.hm> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Mon, 27 Aug 2018, Jonathan Morton wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> So in practice, it's easier to measure SNR at the receiver, or
>> >> indirectly by
>> >>> observing packet loss by dint of missing acknowledgements returned to
>> >> the
>> >>> transmitter.
>> >>
>> >> Also, there may be other transmitters that the recipient of the packets
>> >> can hear
>> >> that you cannot hear, so it's not possible to detect colliding
>> >> transmissions
>> >> directly in all cases.
>> >>
>> >> This is another trap that digital/wired people fall into that doesn't
>> >> really
>> >> apply in the analog/radio world.
>> >>
>> >> David Lang
>> >>
>> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Make-wifi-fast mailing list
> Make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/make-wifi-fast



-- 

Dave Täht
CEO, TekLibre, LLC
http://www.teklibre.com
Tel: 1-669-226-2619

  reply	other threads:[~2018-08-28  2:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-26 12:26 [Make-wifi-fast] [Cerowrt-devel] closing up my make-wifi-fast lab David P. Reed
2018-08-27  6:00 ` Bob McMahon
2018-08-27  6:26   ` Jonathan Morton
2018-08-27  7:06     ` Bob McMahon
2018-08-27  7:52       ` Jonathan Morton
2018-08-27  8:34         ` Bob McMahon
2018-08-27 19:11           ` Bob McMahon
2018-08-27 19:45             ` Jonathan Morton
2018-08-27 19:59               ` Bob McMahon
     [not found]               ` <alpine.DEB.2.02.1808271431590.2583@nftneq.ynat.uz>
2018-08-28  1:46                 ` [Make-wifi-fast] [Bloat] " Bob McMahon
     [not found]                   ` <alpine.DEB.2.02.1808271750490.2583@nftneq.ynat.uz>
2018-08-28  1:55                     ` Bob McMahon
2018-08-28  2:14                       ` Dave Taht [this message]
     [not found]                         ` <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.1808272031560.20375@qynat-yncgbc>
2018-08-28  4:44                           ` [Make-wifi-fast] deep wifi Dave Taht
2018-08-28  5:43                             ` Bob McMahon
2018-08-30 19:12               ` [Make-wifi-fast] [Cerowrt-devel] closing up my make-wifi-fast lab bkil
2018-08-30 19:17                 ` Bob McMahon
2018-08-30 20:36                   ` bkil
2018-09-03 19:30                     ` Bob McMahon
2018-08-27  7:24     ` [Make-wifi-fast] [Bloat] " Luca Muscariello
2018-08-27  7:39       ` Bob McMahon
2018-08-27  7:51         ` Luca Muscariello
2018-08-30 19:11 ` [Make-wifi-fast] " bkil

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/make-wifi-fast.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAA93jw5MkZjuQGnMdmkn1DehpoX-UJTqu6EYDH38zM2dkrFLGQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    --cc=bob.mcmahon@broadcom.com \
    --cc=david@lang.hm \
    --cc=make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox