From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qk0-x242.google.com (mail-qk0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9093D3BA8D for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 09:18:19 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-qk0-x242.google.com with SMTP id e1so2695681qkh.1 for ; Thu, 05 Jan 2017 06:18:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KA2mjsBjsJL62O9CNApe1cOG6TM3TGKF2YKPOgMRUM4=; b=D4B7d+ko38m2Pg7/rABHPpaFEs+mrozk1RZMtqF/Neijpz0odFLwycAQA72HCQqh9P hElXStg+JFBQBPO3VDX7od7oPWPqjPbkTteX4yTUATCnQ5yGdD/HyRwhTImUF+uFf78r OdKHvTTlRH55jqk2C2OnjeFX0btwqJaDalnnSI5VFsQa0CJDino1HvB+z83idQPeWDEm PXLvQXG9l4vkUx9lQHDTN3pL3TJRrZfdCudVpoP52DkKhreM45a4o+u4RQNHCCLLSieO tprWjsLdM3WlbmKSYtrYuuXV2gfeXdhfxVsDmko5cD8q2rwagV2kEVwPGHQl2p6lQwRS UttA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KA2mjsBjsJL62O9CNApe1cOG6TM3TGKF2YKPOgMRUM4=; b=eV/HrjRZaLoWwz6ZwootJmcFmStES+xBK8Nd3VAQmiPCcdGtE38uCvy+KeF++OIk/s lixB75k2OdqJCSRH2+9dtzKO0wgOyK8nfeHhlDS5sV2sgGvKKNv0aeML49aLh6K3STdS qylP1ijWVjyleL2Cs2LsouFmEaCl7zv9rZ5eNrh9Yx4K8o69NK1ioW3VRubTIl5iUwak BxFmWm2H5hVq6J5B/FrRivylaE9CJLaIcT1+aTOFvvmsMuPKOEQrI/R2FyDl3j1WP/oh s0S/M2pa2aTsYjRef7sAqg6YZmwRD9tcdYWFR4lX/uAjiz60uWlo034VROgj+EiUq1q/ OseA== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXLOWsrChT7TM0z4FSfspCjyxnxzEd8GoSVyuIZ0mRPyUlor1KQ/zMUK+hLIaf7sCO6Y0BpnuxRN12EzPQ== X-Received: by 10.55.198.149 with SMTP id s21mr77099503qkl.196.1483625899015; Thu, 05 Jan 2017 06:18:19 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.12.152.197 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 06:18:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <46229222-ccb9-549d-578d-a8f4c9b83de4@nbd.name> References: <46229222-ccb9-549d-578d-a8f4c9b83de4@nbd.name> From: Dave Taht Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 06:18:18 -0800 Message-ID: To: Felix Fietkau Cc: Loganaden Velvindron , make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net, LEDE Development List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] ath9k airtime fairness stabiity issues? X-BeenThere: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 14:18:19 -0000 On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 5:23 AM, Felix Fietkau wrote: > On 2017-01-05 14:22, Loganaden Velvindron wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 4:59 PM, Dave Taht wrote: >>> Felix: >>> >>> Was there a bugreport? (don't see one) >>> >>> Do you have a specific device or behavior triggering this revert? >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 4:42 AM, Dave Taht wrote: >>>> https://github.com/lede-project/source/commit/c296ba834db4ce8c71e0ad70= 30aab188fe60b27b >>> >>> >> >> Hi nbd & Toke, >> >> Would it be possible to enable it only on platforms like the tp-link >> archer c7 v2 and the ubnt, where we have confirmed test reports for >> the upcoming release ? > I think it's quite unlikely that these issues are hardware specific. > It's probably more related to the environment, types of clients, or even > traffic patterns. OK, well, I filed a bug. Can I encourage your reporters to chime in on their issues and what hardware they see them on? https://bugs.lede-project.org/index.php?do=3Ddetails&task_id=3D368 We have extensive testbeds available, but my big one is 2 hours away right now (and running a version of lede with this patch from october or so), and hard to upgrade remotely. Been building up a new one in SF (warmer) this week, just deployed a bunch of "c.h.i.p"s to stress it out, but now I have to go check to see which builds of lede I installed where. I'm pretty sure the UAP-lites are running jan 2... the wndr is jan 4.... (And here I was dreaming up ways to seriously stress out ipv6 multicast (adding tons of routes to babel, and/or using "uftp" heavily) (see https://bugs.lede-project.org/index.php?do=3Ddetails&task_id=3D253 )) I'm going to finish getting something up that works and then go blow up multicast harder, I think, while scratching my head on ATF. At least I can get some non-atf data on how the chips behave, I guess. --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht Let's go make home routers and wifi faster! With better software! http://blog.cerowrt.org