* [Make-wifi-fast] fcc vote on 6ghz thursday @ 2020-04-22 15:17 Dave Taht 2020-04-22 17:32 ` Dave Taht 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Dave Taht @ 2020-04-22 15:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Make-Wifi-fast I just wish I knew what was required for an open source maker of outdoor capable APs had to do. So far I haven't found the draft rules... It sounded to me that outdoor use required use of a gps and active ongoing registration into some FCC database. https://www.fiercewireless.com/regulatory/fcc-sets-all-1-200-mhz-motion-for-6-ghz-unlicensed “We’re stoked about what the 6 GHz band can do,” he told Fierce. “Imagine getting 2 Gbps on your phone, that’s something Wi-Fi 6E and 6 GHz can accomplish,” as well as produce latency on the order of 2 milliseconds or less, which is why it’s so attractive for things like AR/VR." -- Make Music, Not War Dave Täht CTO, TekLibre, LLC http://www.teklibre.com Tel: 1-831-435-0729 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [Make-wifi-fast] fcc vote on 6ghz thursday 2020-04-22 15:17 [Make-wifi-fast] fcc vote on 6ghz thursday Dave Taht @ 2020-04-22 17:32 ` Dave Taht 2020-04-23 14:32 ` Harshal Chhaya 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Dave Taht @ 2020-04-22 17:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Make-Wifi-fast H/T to james. First reading - ALL wifi 6ghz access points need to report their location to a centralized FCC database via a yet to be written "AFC" system. Hmmm... more: https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-363490A1.pdf (linked from here: https://www.fcc.gov/document/promoting-unlicensed-use-6-ghz-band-0) Draft rules are in appendix A. They could have changed slightly between the agenda release on Apr 2, and the meeting/vote tomorrow. Final version will be published after the meeting tomorrow. Don't ask me how long that takes. For the very high level summary of the four operating modes, see III A, III B, IV A and IV B in the Table of Contents. III. Report and Order: A. Standard-Power Operations in U-NII-5 and U-NII-7 Bands B. Low-Power Indoor Operations Across the Entire 6 GHz Band IV. Further Proposed: A. Very Low Power Operation B. Higher Power Spectral Density for Low Power Indoor Operations https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-363490A1.pdf On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 8:17 AM Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote: > > I just wish I knew what was required for an open source maker of > outdoor capable APs had to do. So far I haven't found the draft > rules... > > It sounded to me that outdoor use required use of a gps and active > ongoing registration into some FCC database. > > https://www.fiercewireless.com/regulatory/fcc-sets-all-1-200-mhz-motion-for-6-ghz-unlicensed > > “We’re stoked about what the 6 GHz band can do,” he told Fierce. > “Imagine getting 2 Gbps on your phone, that’s something Wi-Fi 6E and 6 > GHz can accomplish,” as well as produce latency on the order of 2 > milliseconds or less, which is why it’s so attractive for things like > AR/VR." > > > > -- > Make Music, Not War > > Dave Täht > CTO, TekLibre, LLC > http://www.teklibre.com > Tel: 1-831-435-0729 -- Make Music, Not War Dave Täht CTO, TekLibre, LLC http://www.teklibre.com Tel: 1-831-435-0729 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [Make-wifi-fast] fcc vote on 6ghz thursday 2020-04-22 17:32 ` Dave Taht @ 2020-04-23 14:32 ` Harshal Chhaya 2020-04-23 15:05 ` Dave Taht 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Harshal Chhaya @ 2020-04-23 14:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dave Taht; +Cc: Make-Wifi-fast FYI - you can listen to today's FCC meeting at https://www.fcc.gov/general/live On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 12:33 PM Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote: > > H/T to james. First reading - ALL wifi 6ghz access points need to > report their location to a centralized FCC database > via a yet to be written "AFC" system. Hmmm... > > more: > > https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-363490A1.pdf (linked from > here: https://www.fcc.gov/document/promoting-unlicensed-use-6-ghz-band-0) > > Draft rules are in appendix A. They could have changed slightly > between the agenda release on Apr 2, and the meeting/vote tomorrow. > Final version will be published after the meeting tomorrow. Don't ask > me how long that takes. > > For the very high level summary of the four operating modes, see III > A, III B, IV A and IV B in the Table of Contents. > > III. Report and Order: > A. Standard-Power Operations in U-NII-5 and U-NII-7 Bands > B. Low-Power Indoor Operations Across the Entire 6 GHz Band > IV. Further Proposed: > A. Very Low Power Operation > B. Higher Power Spectral Density for Low Power Indoor Operations > > > https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-363490A1.pdf > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 8:17 AM Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I just wish I knew what was required for an open source maker of > > outdoor capable APs had to do. So far I haven't found the draft > > rules... > > > > It sounded to me that outdoor use required use of a gps and active > > ongoing registration into some FCC database. > > > > https://www.fiercewireless.com/regulatory/fcc-sets-all-1-200-mhz-motion-for-6-ghz-unlicensed > > > > “We’re stoked about what the 6 GHz band can do,” he told Fierce. > > “Imagine getting 2 Gbps on your phone, that’s something Wi-Fi 6E and 6 > > GHz can accomplish,” as well as produce latency on the order of 2 > > milliseconds or less, which is why it’s so attractive for things like > > AR/VR." > > > > > > > > -- > > Make Music, Not War > > > > Dave Täht > > CTO, TekLibre, LLC > > http://www.teklibre.com > > Tel: 1-831-435-0729 > > > > -- > Make Music, Not War > > Dave Täht > CTO, TekLibre, LLC > http://www.teklibre.com > Tel: 1-831-435-0729 > _______________________________________________ > Make-wifi-fast mailing list > Make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/make-wifi-fast ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [Make-wifi-fast] fcc vote on 6ghz thursday 2020-04-23 14:32 ` Harshal Chhaya @ 2020-04-23 15:05 ` Dave Taht 2020-04-23 15:35 ` Isaac Konikoff 2020-04-23 15:35 ` Dave Taht 0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Dave Taht @ 2020-04-23 15:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Harshal Chhaya; +Cc: Make-Wifi-fast sure wish there was a chat window. i have some pithy comments to make. (The whole centralized db idea seems very flawed. you want my IP address once a day with my home routers exact location? DFS style autodetection seems saner) And then there's the 5G subsidy being discussed as I write. On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 7:32 AM Harshal Chhaya <harshal@gmail.com> wrote: > > FYI - you can listen to today's FCC meeting at https://www.fcc.gov/general/live > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 12:33 PM Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > H/T to james. First reading - ALL wifi 6ghz access points need to > > report their location to a centralized FCC database > > via a yet to be written "AFC" system. Hmmm... > > > > more: > > > > https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-363490A1.pdf (linked from > > here: https://www.fcc.gov/document/promoting-unlicensed-use-6-ghz-band-0) > > > > Draft rules are in appendix A. They could have changed slightly > > between the agenda release on Apr 2, and the meeting/vote tomorrow. > > Final version will be published after the meeting tomorrow. Don't ask > > me how long that takes. > > > > For the very high level summary of the four operating modes, see III > > A, III B, IV A and IV B in the Table of Contents. > > > > III. Report and Order: > > A. Standard-Power Operations in U-NII-5 and U-NII-7 Bands > > B. Low-Power Indoor Operations Across the Entire 6 GHz Band > > IV. Further Proposed: > > A. Very Low Power Operation > > B. Higher Power Spectral Density for Low Power Indoor Operations > > > > > > https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-363490A1.pdf > > > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 8:17 AM Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > I just wish I knew what was required for an open source maker of > > > outdoor capable APs had to do. So far I haven't found the draft > > > rules... > > > > > > It sounded to me that outdoor use required use of a gps and active > > > ongoing registration into some FCC database. > > > > > > https://www.fiercewireless.com/regulatory/fcc-sets-all-1-200-mhz-motion-for-6-ghz-unlicensed > > > > > > “We’re stoked about what the 6 GHz band can do,” he told Fierce. > > > “Imagine getting 2 Gbps on your phone, that’s something Wi-Fi 6E and 6 > > > GHz can accomplish,” as well as produce latency on the order of 2 > > > milliseconds or less, which is why it’s so attractive for things like > > > AR/VR." > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Make Music, Not War > > > > > > Dave Täht > > > CTO, TekLibre, LLC > > > http://www.teklibre.com > > > Tel: 1-831-435-0729 > > > > > > > > -- > > Make Music, Not War > > > > Dave Täht > > CTO, TekLibre, LLC > > http://www.teklibre.com > > Tel: 1-831-435-0729 > > _______________________________________________ > > Make-wifi-fast mailing list > > Make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net > > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/make-wifi-fast -- Make Music, Not War Dave Täht CTO, TekLibre, LLC http://www.teklibre.com Tel: 1-831-435-0729 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [Make-wifi-fast] fcc vote on 6ghz thursday 2020-04-23 15:05 ` Dave Taht @ 2020-04-23 15:35 ` Isaac Konikoff 2020-04-23 15:35 ` Dave Taht 1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Isaac Konikoff @ 2020-04-23 15:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dave Taht; +Cc: Harshal Chhaya, Make-Wifi-fast [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3794 bytes --] It does seem a bit intrusive, however in the context of working with existing users of the spectrum, AFC seems to make sense. This WLPC video is a good intro: https://youtu.be/knFsQAoIw1I At 26:38 is a description of the coordination process and 52:32 an intro to AFC. On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 8:05 AM Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote: > sure wish there was a chat window. i have some pithy comments to make. > (The whole centralized db idea seems very flawed. > you want my IP address once a day with my home routers exact location? > DFS style autodetection seems saner) > > And then there's the 5G subsidy being discussed as I write. > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 7:32 AM Harshal Chhaya <harshal@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > FYI - you can listen to today's FCC meeting at > https://www.fcc.gov/general/live > > > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 12:33 PM Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > H/T to james. First reading - ALL wifi 6ghz access points need to > > > report their location to a centralized FCC database > > > via a yet to be written "AFC" system. Hmmm... > > > > > > more: > > > > > > https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-363490A1.pdf (linked from > > > here: > https://www.fcc.gov/document/promoting-unlicensed-use-6-ghz-band-0) > > > > > > Draft rules are in appendix A. They could have changed slightly > > > between the agenda release on Apr 2, and the meeting/vote tomorrow. > > > Final version will be published after the meeting tomorrow. Don't ask > > > me how long that takes. > > > > > > For the very high level summary of the four operating modes, see III > > > A, III B, IV A and IV B in the Table of Contents. > > > > > > III. Report and Order: > > > A. Standard-Power Operations in U-NII-5 and U-NII-7 Bands > > > B. Low-Power Indoor Operations Across the Entire 6 GHz Band > > > IV. Further Proposed: > > > A. Very Low Power Operation > > > B. Higher Power Spectral Density for Low Power Indoor Operations > > > > > > > > > https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-363490A1.pdf > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 8:17 AM Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > I just wish I knew what was required for an open source maker of > > > > outdoor capable APs had to do. So far I haven't found the draft > > > > rules... > > > > > > > > It sounded to me that outdoor use required use of a gps and active > > > > ongoing registration into some FCC database. > > > > > > > > > https://www.fiercewireless.com/regulatory/fcc-sets-all-1-200-mhz-motion-for-6-ghz-unlicensed > > > > > > > > “We’re stoked about what the 6 GHz band can do,” he told Fierce. > > > > “Imagine getting 2 Gbps on your phone, that’s something Wi-Fi 6E and > 6 > > > > GHz can accomplish,” as well as produce latency on the order of 2 > > > > milliseconds or less, which is why it’s so attractive for things like > > > > AR/VR." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Make Music, Not War > > > > > > > > Dave Täht > > > > CTO, TekLibre, LLC > > > > http://www.teklibre.com > > > > Tel: 1-831-435-0729 > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Make Music, Not War > > > > > > Dave Täht > > > CTO, TekLibre, LLC > > > http://www.teklibre.com > > > Tel: 1-831-435-0729 > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Make-wifi-fast mailing list > > > Make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net > > > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/make-wifi-fast > > > > -- > Make Music, Not War > > Dave Täht > CTO, TekLibre, LLC > http://www.teklibre.com > Tel: 1-831-435-0729 > _______________________________________________ > Make-wifi-fast mailing list > Make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/make-wifi-fast [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 6144 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [Make-wifi-fast] fcc vote on 6ghz thursday 2020-04-23 15:05 ` Dave Taht 2020-04-23 15:35 ` Isaac Konikoff @ 2020-04-23 15:35 ` Dave Taht 2020-04-27 17:28 ` James Lepp 1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Dave Taht @ 2020-04-23 15:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Harshal Chhaya; +Cc: Make-Wifi-fast it was pretty neat to catch the orbital debris talk! But I guess I missed the 6ghz preso? On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 8:05 AM Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote: > > sure wish there was a chat window. i have some pithy comments to make. > (The whole centralized db idea seems very flawed. > you want my IP address once a day with my home routers exact location? > DFS style autodetection seems saner) > > And then there's the 5G subsidy being discussed as I write. > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 7:32 AM Harshal Chhaya <harshal@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > FYI - you can listen to today's FCC meeting at https://www.fcc.gov/general/live > > > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 12:33 PM Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > H/T to james. First reading - ALL wifi 6ghz access points need to > > > report their location to a centralized FCC database > > > via a yet to be written "AFC" system. Hmmm... > > > > > > more: > > > > > > https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-363490A1.pdf (linked from > > > here: https://www.fcc.gov/document/promoting-unlicensed-use-6-ghz-band-0) > > > > > > Draft rules are in appendix A. They could have changed slightly > > > between the agenda release on Apr 2, and the meeting/vote tomorrow. > > > Final version will be published after the meeting tomorrow. Don't ask > > > me how long that takes. > > > > > > For the very high level summary of the four operating modes, see III > > > A, III B, IV A and IV B in the Table of Contents. > > > > > > III. Report and Order: > > > A. Standard-Power Operations in U-NII-5 and U-NII-7 Bands > > > B. Low-Power Indoor Operations Across the Entire 6 GHz Band > > > IV. Further Proposed: > > > A. Very Low Power Operation > > > B. Higher Power Spectral Density for Low Power Indoor Operations > > > > > > > > > https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-363490A1.pdf > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 8:17 AM Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > I just wish I knew what was required for an open source maker of > > > > outdoor capable APs had to do. So far I haven't found the draft > > > > rules... > > > > > > > > It sounded to me that outdoor use required use of a gps and active > > > > ongoing registration into some FCC database. > > > > > > > > https://www.fiercewireless.com/regulatory/fcc-sets-all-1-200-mhz-motion-for-6-ghz-unlicensed > > > > > > > > “We’re stoked about what the 6 GHz band can do,” he told Fierce. > > > > “Imagine getting 2 Gbps on your phone, that’s something Wi-Fi 6E and 6 > > > > GHz can accomplish,” as well as produce latency on the order of 2 > > > > milliseconds or less, which is why it’s so attractive for things like > > > > AR/VR." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Make Music, Not War > > > > > > > > Dave Täht > > > > CTO, TekLibre, LLC > > > > http://www.teklibre.com > > > > Tel: 1-831-435-0729 > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Make Music, Not War > > > > > > Dave Täht > > > CTO, TekLibre, LLC > > > http://www.teklibre.com > > > Tel: 1-831-435-0729 > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Make-wifi-fast mailing list > > > Make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net > > > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/make-wifi-fast > > > > -- > Make Music, Not War > > Dave Täht > CTO, TekLibre, LLC > http://www.teklibre.com > Tel: 1-831-435-0729 -- Make Music, Not War Dave Täht CTO, TekLibre, LLC http://www.teklibre.com Tel: 1-831-435-0729 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [Make-wifi-fast] fcc vote on 6ghz thursday 2020-04-23 15:35 ` Dave Taht @ 2020-04-27 17:28 ` James Lepp 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: James Lepp @ 2020-04-27 17:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Make-Wifi-fast [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4351 bytes --] The final version from the FCC vote is available here: https://www.fcc.gov/document/6-ghz-unlicensed-rofnprm Appendix A is the actual rules. I understand some last minute changes were made between Apr 2 draft and this Apr 24 final version - so don't build and certify any hardware based on last week's link :). -James On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 11:36 AM Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote: > it was pretty neat to catch the orbital debris talk! But I guess I > missed the 6ghz preso? > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 8:05 AM Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > sure wish there was a chat window. i have some pithy comments to make. > > (The whole centralized db idea seems very flawed. > > you want my IP address once a day with my home routers exact location? > > DFS style autodetection seems saner) > > > > And then there's the 5G subsidy being discussed as I write. > > > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 7:32 AM Harshal Chhaya <harshal@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > FYI - you can listen to today's FCC meeting at > https://www.fcc.gov/general/live > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 12:33 PM Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > H/T to james. First reading - ALL wifi 6ghz access points need to > > > > report their location to a centralized FCC database > > > > via a yet to be written "AFC" system. Hmmm... > > > > > > > > more: > > > > > > > > https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-363490A1.pdf (linked > from > > > > here: > https://www.fcc.gov/document/promoting-unlicensed-use-6-ghz-band-0) > > > > > > > > Draft rules are in appendix A. They could have changed slightly > > > > between the agenda release on Apr 2, and the meeting/vote tomorrow. > > > > Final version will be published after the meeting tomorrow. Don't ask > > > > me how long that takes. > > > > > > > > For the very high level summary of the four operating modes, see III > > > > A, III B, IV A and IV B in the Table of Contents. > > > > > > > > III. Report and Order: > > > > A. Standard-Power Operations in U-NII-5 and U-NII-7 Bands > > > > B. Low-Power Indoor Operations Across the Entire 6 GHz Band > > > > IV. Further Proposed: > > > > A. Very Low Power Operation > > > > B. Higher Power Spectral Density for Low Power Indoor Operations > > > > > > > > > > > > https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-363490A1.pdf > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 8:17 AM Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I just wish I knew what was required for an open source maker of > > > > > outdoor capable APs had to do. So far I haven't found the draft > > > > > rules... > > > > > > > > > > It sounded to me that outdoor use required use of a gps and active > > > > > ongoing registration into some FCC database. > > > > > > > > > > > https://www.fiercewireless.com/regulatory/fcc-sets-all-1-200-mhz-motion-for-6-ghz-unlicensed > > > > > > > > > > “We’re stoked about what the 6 GHz band can do,” he told Fierce. > > > > > “Imagine getting 2 Gbps on your phone, that’s something Wi-Fi 6E > and 6 > > > > > GHz can accomplish,” as well as produce latency on the order of 2 > > > > > milliseconds or less, which is why it’s so attractive for things > like > > > > > AR/VR." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Make Music, Not War > > > > > > > > > > Dave Täht > > > > > CTO, TekLibre, LLC > > > > > http://www.teklibre.com > > > > > Tel: 1-831-435-0729 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Make Music, Not War > > > > > > > > Dave Täht > > > > CTO, TekLibre, LLC > > > > http://www.teklibre.com > > > > Tel: 1-831-435-0729 > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Make-wifi-fast mailing list > > > > Make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net > > > > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/make-wifi-fast > > > > > > > > -- > > Make Music, Not War > > > > Dave Täht > > CTO, TekLibre, LLC > > http://www.teklibre.com > > Tel: 1-831-435-0729 > > > > -- > Make Music, Not War > > Dave Täht > CTO, TekLibre, LLC > http://www.teklibre.com > Tel: 1-831-435-0729 > _______________________________________________ > Make-wifi-fast mailing list > Make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/make-wifi-fast [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 7166 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-04-27 17:28 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2020-04-22 15:17 [Make-wifi-fast] fcc vote on 6ghz thursday Dave Taht 2020-04-22 17:32 ` Dave Taht 2020-04-23 14:32 ` Harshal Chhaya 2020-04-23 15:05 ` Dave Taht 2020-04-23 15:35 ` Isaac Konikoff 2020-04-23 15:35 ` Dave Taht 2020-04-27 17:28 ` James Lepp
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox