Lets make wifi fast again!
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>
Cc: Simon Barber <simon@superduper.net>,
	Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>,
	 make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] Fwd: Re: [iccrg] TCP behavior across WiFi pointers ?
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2017 06:57:30 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw6JQOXEbCnWM6BpkNm50Qia_VY1Lpckwm4h-H0sWFiHZQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87374u4nsc.fsf@toke.dk>

On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 4:48 AM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk> wrote:
> Simon Barber <simon@superduper.net> writes:
>
>> Certain things, yes, others - not so much. No congestion control for
>> example. It’s very much the common case that the wireless client is
>> the TCP endpoint, and it’s rare to see drops, but they do happen.
>> FastACK keeps the TCP ACK rate controlled by the wireless bandwidth,
>> unlike a proxy. This is the key innovation here.
>
> Right, actually went and read the paper now. Seems clear enough; a few
> questions, though:
>
> - From figure 12 it looks like you are also implicitly doing ACK
>   compression? I.e., if you get two packets with seq n and n+1 you will
>   only send an ACK back to the sender for n+1?

https://github.com/dtaht/sch_cake/blob/cobalt/sch_cake.c#L902 might be
worthy of review.

> - Did you measure the latency impact of FastACK? You mention you will do
>   that once it's deployed, but does that mean you didn't measure this at
>   all in the testbed?
> -Toke



-- 

Dave Täht
CEO, TekLibre, LLC
http://www.teklibre.com
Tel: 1-669-226-2619

  reply	other threads:[~2017-12-01 14:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-30  7:39 Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2017-11-30  8:04 ` Dave Taht
2017-11-30  8:07   ` Dave Taht
2017-11-30  8:21     ` Jonathan Morton
2017-11-30  8:52       ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2017-11-30 22:35         ` Simon Barber
2017-11-30 22:50           ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2017-11-30 22:59             ` Simon Barber
2017-12-01 12:48               ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2017-12-01 14:57                 ` Dave Taht [this message]
2017-11-30  9:03     ` Sebastian Moeller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/make-wifi-fast.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAA93jw6JQOXEbCnWM6BpkNm50Qia_VY1Lpckwm4h-H0sWFiHZQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    --cc=chromatix99@gmail.com \
    --cc=make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=simon@superduper.net \
    --cc=toke@toke.dk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox