From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qk0-x229.google.com (mail-qk0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7ADC3B260 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 12:05:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-qk0-x229.google.com with SMTP id w69so9593896qka.4 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 09:05:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=067dWsfVphlLzuu4xpiT/h1uWwwieA7le0SgK3DhORo=; b=cgyVkXTmk2fpE7BUGEOxjT8sMulej0dKOnQ+PGWrUHswGfxanCiXTKZE5o27iWK3GY KGwr9u1Ht7Fuh2KWWrEHDgWeGAxCGDsZmIELOQzx4UmrTyTtolruJUDmCTGzOZNorBdG FK9T22BwyvSryrLTzswzZ/OlfdRggXgCx5xSuTxkTMrD2BiFyIXzMLeFp3Tjj1hmLHap uLCyU/Qe/Qk8zqJelFWT6STfdXp3cmJpNETWw81alimAvfW35i7bPmyX1Jyuo85ETpit 9FISUapeyT4YaNjdpjXRRu9JKtp124Rd1e6N71AiK1+I/FIF5MU0urPoxX0gl1dIrIQw WpUg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=067dWsfVphlLzuu4xpiT/h1uWwwieA7le0SgK3DhORo=; b=derqTXveuogtnZSatb/znBdhoyZda0dfngK7eBV/pr2jHTv6q1RUwzN+sB7Unx43aN FTnnMgghvXZStaSJIQbG2n5iFwfqwLbE/VY67WwNY5zbWua+915hO1ueIgBj0virYm9S Dwbek06i74WmmSK5uv1/d2PQqzggdN4m79ZOyMa721Wu3Rjd+NWd0o8H97r5T5SEr6Pk tdggTJRNrzHL0MjC0qwb1REew+5TUgiVjNePpCVbKilVsZk6Zt4x4cjtlKwx5mW2C4Ut vMwnqeneh7CdaUNttrFPwGQMV7In30czTb5XZcewwbYx4WD2vY6pJHdxbgkJkawzMaoS J7Hw== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvdfodqSjFP/EJpR1tIB/dnuPeYyRgDVcqKDPQ+vFA9E6edTOlnQa/9SBA1YdHrJI6TSL6Ah5rQMZYl3lA== X-Received: by 10.55.162.79 with SMTP id l76mr2366814qke.17.1477497907240; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 09:05:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.12.146.164 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 09:05:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Dave Taht Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 09:05:06 -0700 Message-ID: To: Michal Kazior Cc: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] in search of a plot X-BeenThere: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 16:05:07 -0000 On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 12:47 AM, Michal Kazior w= rote: > Hi Dave, > > On 26 October 2016 at 03:25, Dave Taht wrote: >> At some point in the last 8 months, I had a plot (of 50? stations) >> that showed before/after results with the then current ath10k driver, >> and the new stuff, with this "ramping up" chaotic plot ultimately >> showing 10s of seconds of latency, lots of jitter, flows stopping for >> a long time, etc. >> >> followed by another one, that did 50 stations "cleanly". I cannot for >> the life of me find them, or remember who I got the data from, and I'd >> like to use those for the linuxplumbers talk. Any memories? I did not >> apparently blog those, so I figure it's in email somewhere... > > It was me. 100 stations. Latency sky-rocketing. Flows starved. Thanks! boy that first plot was ugly! > The "clean" case included my WIP ATF implementation for ath10k. > Unfortunately I never got to finish it up. Will you be at linuxplumbers? > Funnily enough I dug the plot up yesterday for a different reason: > > http://imgur.com/a/sSn8V > > > Micha=C5=82 --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht Let's go make home routers and wifi faster! With better software! http://blog.cerowrt.org