From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi0-x241.google.com (mail-oi0-x241.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6032B3B260 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2016 13:26:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-oi0-x241.google.com with SMTP id f12so12177860oig.0 for ; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 10:26:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=almUP1Hh+JeubxTVFrD7a8jeRsTfXCONLzHSxBM/qgI=; b=s/fMtVb5h5F4DyUN+nzGLGGCI8MYRgriQaCBrERBODB1NBNcSLhxHp8m+JUezEzwXQ SNSnoSCgi5PgvjBOMsEYSFZUzaYkD84pSuWO4aUFFTDYrtvAnIXu+ELO5CNVJePv9Dsz SayczutYC6APzi96ZfoXmPg3cym/BfxZ8SglQ5aN2jeoATSGxw/SWiWQEpdCflKdHLYe kOlS5QokW9mNKFBG1fJgr2UFQCKIwzXn7GF7u2SvAMMnVRosnWX/phgP0euVEKSFa640 uJ7JmrzOFMlcmBjgS1rk/0guPFR+72EbRJyCcaCTGbnRb7i99rrXNdC1S1T6DryvjFZd e4kQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=almUP1Hh+JeubxTVFrD7a8jeRsTfXCONLzHSxBM/qgI=; b=k1ZtLkd9guZbbGAbPUOz2RCilcchjy7XebLEEG8TkxotbGDMm/W1cIk8Ha7V0Q+BP4 asuMU8ytowbu5bp31+I5hfZNCUz4BsfHkaHerEPU1Amc3KghwODynwKrfoP2/nuO+vHD Y61B8SBbetTIz4tIw+G++VQ9/tovAxFdiAnNKbBCgEI0/tPG8X3l/+do0tMHPaWmV8XR Stz7nWyq/w5X2xuDB41UkuDcP5tS62gRCbB0fiPNN3LS634dVxSJL5sP8LXVjs+YMeb0 MirqsbX3pY6a/GyH0Jt+cMo3CuUNH9buRbPy4RtkMLL4pdDDe7aPB9fZM2pK91Rs9oGn EWgQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tI+9JAa9jO3UybuBCbzGMF0JAZcBbj8gFW8rQQkwt4LHydMqBJYU2RIAje9qel4eq60trY0MtBrkX6BOg== X-Received: by 10.157.22.163 with SMTP id c32mr8110055ote.127.1465234009782; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 10:26:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.202.229.210 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Jun 2016 10:26:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Dave Taht Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2016 10:26:49 -0700 Message-ID: To: Tim Shepard Cc: =?UTF-8?B?VG9rZSBIw7hpbGFuZC1Kw7hyZ2Vuc2Vu?= , linux-wireless , make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net, "ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] [RFC/RFT 2/5] ath9k: use mac80211 intermediate software queues X-BeenThere: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2016 17:26:50 -0000 For the record, michal's lastest patchset for the ath10k is here: https://github.com/kazikcz/linux/tree/fqmac-v5 which includes the reworked codel.h support (which also landed in net-next as of april 22) (no, haven't tried it yet, I'm only a day back from vacation) ... but it would pay to leverage rate control more, for the ath9k, and I'd like folk to agree on a standardized set of statistics in a std location that can be polled for all implementations (ath9k, ath10k, mt76) I am also reviewing this: http://info.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/papers/20160511-mysched-preprint.pdf as we have a chance to innovate and use less locking with all this stuff happening at the mac80211 layer.