From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-qk0-x229.google.com (mail-qk0-x229.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::229])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 527173B25E
 for <make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
 Sun, 18 Sep 2016 02:19:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x229.google.com with SMTP id t7so122608448qkh.2
 for <make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
 Sat, 17 Sep 2016 23:19:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :cc; bh=zOHEt02LyCmQO0/g7acP9CpCNf+yJbyS3HcQiNGcvLY=;
 b=P9FgUANSieuXKkCmhWkoOEnG3H35sI4nGArvxCBX538eFW5Z49OhzlHcvI766ek7fJ
 KFESYq7sscHxIRuWkFQI4SmnsNl5zg+ny6ng/CcwQrScQ6sneHV9DFj7L8nElvXGfFQu
 coBPBhMBY0wS3xuFt1mPSFJeCL/i0AGl303sPOr/kIh7XfEsC9GbWTQj+31ZzZ72d+mX
 Z6ostvkzcV+IEoibGRIVzIkJR/tBkYkLRZRlTTTgcFESlgtH1oxi2jRXjAWgh9EpwHe0
 nq6osIIz7sXayAwBb/xIQsPdsWKDxP4Vs4ZAzSkCsHkgKE7Nq5kB4ycrBxyBqq9QK7dZ
 g97A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=zOHEt02LyCmQO0/g7acP9CpCNf+yJbyS3HcQiNGcvLY=;
 b=ONDk58LrPhbMGjOJC1WqA7jayuYXHV+P242/3yQqEy/6t6E49L9L6dD7oeR7cEDZFq
 gxvZbEJ8hANzJTyswUrn+6hFTJOVRpiZbwDoIDvUoHdVi2qnS+6Nx2A4dnwqBl3QvM4s
 BN3PJup2L66FiDokvOWBbRLjoZbHEb8sMA8/kvaZeU2eCQPuWFvtOrQ/iC9yMSQQMImv
 3kxKjBSY8lT/C8/Ga2WfQ46z9gaco0u43h+JDB2atsngepHHkm7yGOrpbAiNQgyqdEMH
 NbDg1uyEPdIlwYA5DiC2U6OI368C405Mi24xOyEraddnj9Z3drXwIIv8xBePuxkJbHNd
 AaFg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwMAa5K4gJKzEtdGTbetuz1zM15t+5/tOquHNn2Tov/j1+8/pHcQgRBos+k5nZ98rw2fxFgJ2qqBp/8d6g==
X-Received: by 10.55.54.15 with SMTP id d15mr22699566qka.262.1474179559972;
 Sat, 17 Sep 2016 23:19:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.12.137.214 with HTTP; Sat, 17 Sep 2016 23:19:19 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAOp4FwTqpX39zr+QVssXUENZqCzjjZiOdoXUu9NqMTh4xNiP_A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAA93jw5wFr62SCQ34h51r3o=Q3NKk0a_-6sRD2qAW0n-HE_bVw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOp4FwSR_tgbE8j8Fm9NKPYrqqx1nGDY8rP3OpJoJrO8Jweb-g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOp4FwS6yG-mQcgVtw+GazDW9hzE-uMo9T1=zjq8xa6wy1HeQQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <87shsyjupm.fsf@toke.dk>
 <CAOp4FwQqZvhTc0_YGU7DG=UgONVd7vSeDUBmt5jy-kqTt1es_A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOp4FwTqpX39zr+QVssXUENZqCzjjZiOdoXUu9NqMTh4xNiP_A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2016 23:19:19 -0700
Message-ID: <CAA93jw6sJALCR7L_awO7e-ORCQ3FhkUQ5g4Sh3WJVm-oGwJ9mw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Loganaden Velvindron <loganaden@gmail.com>
Cc: =?UTF-8?B?VG9rZSBIw7hpbGFuZC1Kw7hyZ2Vuc2Vu?= <toke@toke.dk>, 
 make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] crypto-fq bug postmortem is up
X-BeenThere: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: <make-wifi-fast.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/make-wifi-fast>,
 <mailto:make-wifi-fast-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/make-wifi-fast>
List-Post: <mailto:make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:make-wifi-fast-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/make-wifi-fast>,
 <mailto:make-wifi-fast-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 06:19:20 -0000

There does not seem to be a statistically significant difference
there. I would encourage you to use rrul_be instead, as we have not
tackled the hardware queue problem in wifi as yet.

It's also unclear what you are testing, the wifi or the link itself.
The uplink and downlink on ethernet are?