From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: Make-Wifi-fast <make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: [Make-wifi-fast] is there a rigorous definition of airtime fairness
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2021 07:19:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw7+jse4tKRAE7kv9h1+RkRhAmw59goHFQx0n2-X5FZ1LQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
googling for it today, there seems to be some marketing confusion
around it (go googling), involving wmm in particular.
What *we* meant from it was that airtime fairness translated to
proportional fairness, as per
https://www.hamilton.ie/net/single-hop-propfair.pdf
did the market change on us?
--
I tried to build a better future, a few times:
https://wayforward.archive.org/?site=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.icei.org
Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC
next reply other threads:[~2021-11-02 14:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-02 14:19 Dave Taht [this message]
2021-11-02 14:27 ` Dave Taht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/make-wifi-fast.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAA93jw7+jse4tKRAE7kv9h1+RkRhAmw59goHFQx0n2-X5FZ1LQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox