From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qt0-x229.google.com (mail-qt0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E9C53B2A3 for ; Tue, 6 Dec 2016 16:12:41 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-qt0-x229.google.com with SMTP id n6so359791916qtd.1 for ; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 13:12:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=VDaEF88MO69jnpxhxemUDWLDh2auoBmGVx+eyqBdGCk=; b=YWpC2NGfm3Y9sU6UxSlVqHSp/hSHq1SyBL9i85G+8rxFPZS4f2dG8epYpjKx3u3hjb glq5/UF24WnBjTx2Tzcap9Dl0NaoCjV3c4KVj/hs/1Et5YmMtVw71evBT4jVSH84b5Fo u8QI3E9ZPfstzAZMKLH0G0YZ2EASLoN8rBVmtG6WLUUH+YnHO1K8PvGYAT8Ibn1hETdr gTGbeaB5YbUR2LeY5nfN80vAXGtY0/9cVJpKnAh6C82dezP3OFVry6ZGXxDb/bMXcjTj HkkHdNR/9yYga06kaZo7zPmT1DrWVI3oss8G0eyhtP9RXW5bSBjg4011obLbEB3Dh1z3 Q53Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=VDaEF88MO69jnpxhxemUDWLDh2auoBmGVx+eyqBdGCk=; b=m2UmMWtqit6EcZzq4CsjpDe4Pfs6WpoPFkTocg0zm//wPMZWU0t4pP8xz+16u2BHbv j3AmSoRdlHZg9GfD2Iq2gr04FyXvyA8crJU4uX4ME80N1bB7pavjI3MTUn6O0iP27j8x L4FeZIob49g5ddWe0PBdA2jNBwLpF1P6D+va0WgKmiLJovofK73EZ1VhvNcXTUJCMy/d swdgiqDdtYwO79yq443dpUuouqIMrJ2UBf3xN1t89I5Y3kosfVzLRCYP01bDldFTq4QI HOPCUVxRkx2fzjz2mISDspUcXY1STn1BdRolhkdSijRku0FA4BTokYiGRizxMQkiNC4d D1Sg== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC01eFXBQtvZa1BPrxC3hKTzN2sYJOxXfZlDCH6/enXGW1/LeI8Ri8rUDksxXT11eadqD751w1RC1udzmAg== X-Received: by 10.200.36.148 with SMTP id s20mr55133782qts.275.1481058761062; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 13:12:41 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.12.152.197 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Dec 2016 13:12:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <7edb76c5-4393-04cd-2558-560b38d9e7a1@gmail.com> From: Dave Taht Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 13:12:40 -0800 Message-ID: To: Loganaden Velvindron Cc: Noah Causin , make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] Updated LEDE build with airtime patches X-BeenThere: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2016 21:12:41 -0000 that is a correct looking result. We can still do better. The variance on the icmp side is due to the kernel on one side responding to icmp packets faster (on the bottom half of the distribution), and the cost of the context switch (and some in-kernel deprioritization) on the top half. On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 1:08 PM, Loganaden Velvindron wrote: > Using rrul_be gives me better latency. > > Please see attached screenshot. This is closer to what Dave is getting. --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht Let's go make home routers and wifi faster! With better software! http://blog.cerowrt.org