From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Simon Barber <simon@superduper.net>,
Make-Wifi-fast <make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>,
Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] debugging TCP stalls on high-speed wifi
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2019 20:42:04 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw7N34xs6HxutbArLABz4DWBy9kAWV-sxT8VqMkVSCne1w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <34a05f62-8dd0-9ea0-2192-1da5bfe6d843@gmail.com>
On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 5:46 PM Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/12/19 4:59 PM, Simon Barber wrote:
> > I’m currently adding ACK thinning to Linux’s GRO code. Quite a simple addition given the way that code works.
> >
> > Simon
> >
> >
>
> Please don't.
>
> 1) It will not help since many NIC do not use GRO.
>
> 2) This does not help if you receive one ACK per NIC interrupt, which is quite common.
Packets accumulate in the wifi device and driver, if that's the bottleneck.
>
> 3) This breaks GRO transparency.
>
> 4) TCP can implement this in a more effective/controlled way,
> since the peer know a lot more flow characteristics.
>
> Middle-box should not try to make TCP better, they usually break things.
I generally have more hope for open source attempts at this than other
means. And there isn't much left
in TCP that will change in the future; it is an ossified protocol.
802.11n, at least, has a problem fitting many packets into an
aggregate. Sending less packets is a win
in multiple ways:
A) Improves bi-directional throughput
B) Reduces the size of the receivers txop (and retries) - the client
is also often running at a lower rate than
the ap.
C) Delivers the most current ack, sooner
When further transiting an aqm that uses random numbers, it hits the
right packet sooner, also.
I welcome experimentation in this area.
--
Make Music, Not War
Dave Täht
CTO, TekLibre, LLC
http://www.teklibre.com
Tel: 1-831-435-0729
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-13 4:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <14cedbb9300f887fecc399ebcdb70c153955f876.camel@sipsolutions.net>
[not found] ` <CADVnQym_CNktZ917q0-9dVY9dhtiJVRRotGTrPNdZUpkjd3vyw@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <f4670ce0f4399fe82e7168fb9c491d8eb718e8d8.camel@sipsolutions.net>
[not found] ` <99748db5-7898-534b-d407-ed819f07f939@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <ff6b35ad589d7cf0710cb9fca4c799538da2e653.camel@sipsolutions.net>
2019-12-12 23:42 ` Dave Taht
2019-12-13 0:59 ` Simon Barber
2019-12-13 1:46 ` Eric Dumazet
2019-12-13 1:57 ` Simon Barber
2019-12-13 4:42 ` Dave Taht [this message]
2019-12-13 8:08 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/make-wifi-fast.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAA93jw7N34xs6HxutbArLABz4DWBy9kAWV-sxT8VqMkVSCne1w@mail.gmail.com \
--to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=ncardwell@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=simon@superduper.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox