From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-il1-x131.google.com (mail-il1-x131.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 259033B2A4 for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2021 18:52:49 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-il1-x131.google.com with SMTP id s14so8389786ilv.10 for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2021 15:52:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=g4y4TlHYjFYVuE0sodpiWdJ1lQ4Tp/N6wOdmD/R5Jj4=; b=keatjryCU8XiiN/yzEYwOqv5ZinKGwkrW9ayLMPLtACVlLOGorvd6/zvER2K4VyyFU YnoKmL4hBgBDCW4JKw/3wTO+b0HIHAfyplHiMf4gxtKYNCJD52Q3yESp5VtixXapzqEl dJvKaIFWIjXOMfX407KGTu1jd/tBqYjRLeVzKTt9IpOsg4cRdi5IE0McMRFJ38KenrCn lMfAAIW/iZNINVbcOWw9dIw/cd94R3Fslwwighcc3RTmM+YGg0chIEvQRD9ni71fbQOq kL1ek/OnRAjUR8XyJo+ILF5sV2IGtqr8EGma3mWamehzsQwTfvxH2dWbUfZSIGmpBe4n zAJA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=g4y4TlHYjFYVuE0sodpiWdJ1lQ4Tp/N6wOdmD/R5Jj4=; b=VN98aKvz1Y6/xc+Q7dDfBcrdrFA095VGNLdjgMKqqjbiN06zvvcU9IL9W7smle3jys UWNnthCgonjQMwihBVkXETtSSFkpdh3HbEMutx3xGHb8WRt4WxDJrYLNlf3PLt1hwQNv LxlrAJarEMc35nxGoGlCeecJ/HMlXFRUiN0N6i4GkkUzajhIRewYHURjfhOGe2TaEPNV RdVnBpmUgbWmc2GoKpWjifNuo5MHF1xZgbmmFFmrfaO9XE43O47p5bCLkzVxMUszlo5i F1PeZrDtyMCBLxsGw5CszUkX1/H1CiX2B+vYsmCQjXI123z2rhqX9Wo0FslKnVRhx6++ +MMw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530UEZrF9lG9IwR6FSm6JLGaZ9ktsKwZVoc/rVP+Eck0OB38wpWI TUQR58G+U/d6nuikWjNgywAZctwNToKRhNxWXYs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzE1ojujp3r0zdYS9IsfSMMq1+EFl104OhYGAx9dV3kGYCZl3JR/Y7z6syhXQ/t1wR7l36wgx1P8xWGBW9IoLg= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:1608:: with SMTP id t8mr1990891ilu.25.1637279568391; Thu, 18 Nov 2021 15:52:48 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87mtnegwfo.fsf@toke.dk> In-Reply-To: <87mtnegwfo.fsf@toke.dk> From: Dave Taht Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2021 15:52:36 -0800 Message-ID: To: =?UTF-8?B?VG9rZSBIw7hpbGFuZC1Kw7hyZ2Vuc2Vu?= Cc: Rich Brown , Make-Wifi-fast Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] New Realtek driver 802.11ax, with FQ-CoDel support! X-BeenThere: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2021 23:52:49 -0000 I am hoping I can finally retire my ath9k and ath10k chips by next christmas. Apparently amd is leveraging the mediatek MT7921K chip. https://www.tomshardware.com/news/mediatek-and-amd-team-up-on-wi-fi-6e-chip= s-for-next-gen-ryzen-pcs On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 7:17 AM Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen via Make-wifi-fast wrote: > > Rich Brown writes: > > >> On Oct 9, 2021, at 12:00 PM, make-wifi-fast-request@lists.bufferbloat.= net wrote: > >> > >> In the process of being upstreamed: > >> > >> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211008035627.19463-1-pkshih@realtek.com > >> > >>> This driver named rtw89, which is the next generation of rtw88, suppo= rts > >>> Realtek 8852AE 802.11ax 2x2 chip whose new features are OFDMA, DBCC, > >>> Spatial reuse, TWT and BSS coloring; now some of them aren't implemen= ted > >>> though. > > > > This is so cool! A couple questions: > > > > 1) I have lost track: what drivers now incorporate FQ-CoDel? > > $ cd drivers/net/wireless && git grep -l wake_tx_queueath/ath10k/mac.c > ath/ath9k/ath9k.h > ath/ath9k/main.c > ath/ath9k/xmit.c > intel/iwlwifi/mvm/mac80211.c > mediatek/mt76/mt76.h > mediatek/mt76/mt7603/main.c > mediatek/mt76/mt7615/main.c > mediatek/mt76/mt76x0/pci.c > mediatek/mt76/mt76x0/usb.c > mediatek/mt76/mt76x2/pci_main.c > mediatek/mt76/mt76x2/usb_main.c > mediatek/mt76/mt7915/main.c > mediatek/mt76/mt7921/main.c > mediatek/mt76/tx.c > realtek/rtw88/mac80211.c > > > 2) How can we talk about this in OpenWrt (and elsewhere...)? > > - Is it correct/reasonable/sensible to say that the fq_codel wifi= drivers are "good" while the others are "not-so-good" > > - Does the presence of a chip/driver from 1) above indicate a mor= e desirable device? > > - Or is it more nuanced? > > For just the FQ-codel in driver support, yeah, I think it's fair to say > that it's unambiguously "better". > > -Toke > _______________________________________________ > Make-wifi-fast mailing list > Make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/make-wifi-fast --=20 I tried to build a better future, a few times: https://wayforward.archive.org/?site=3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.icei.org Dave T=C3=A4ht CEO, TekLibre, LLC