[Make-wifi-fast] 224gBPS LIFI

[Make-wifi-fast] 224gBPS LIFI

[Dave Taht]

https://www.tomshardware.com/news/li-fi-standard-released

-- 
Podcast: https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7058793910227111937/
Dave Täht CSO, LibreQos

Re: [Make-wifi-fast] 224gBPS LIFI

[Aaron Wood]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1153 bytes --]

That’s an interesting possibility for industrial use-cases where wifi has
been used to get flexibility in retrofit installations without needing to
pull a hunch if new wires, but has been plagued by interference from heavy
equipment.  Although you would need to keep the emitters and receivers
clean in the dirtier environments.

This could also be interesting for (some) p2p links, at least those where
the IR signal won’t be too adversely impacted by atmospheric dust, fog, and
precipitation…

Would it have worked at your yurt lab, Dave? Didn’t that have a few p2p
links through the grounds to connect places together?

On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 4:38 AM Dave Taht via Make-wifi-fast <
make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:

> https://www.tomshardware.com/news/li-fi-standard-released
>
> --
> Podcast:
> https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7058793910227111937/
> Dave Täht CSO, LibreQos
> _______________________________________________
> Make-wifi-fast mailing list
> Make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/make-wifi-fast

-- 
- Sent from my iPhone.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2050 bytes --]

Re: [Make-wifi-fast] 224gBPS LIFI

[Harshal Chhaya]

The more things change, the more they remain the same. :)

The original 1997 standard included a physical layer that used light.
It never really took off for various reasons - lower data rate, line
of sight etc.
It's fascinating to see an improved version come back 25 years later :)



On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 1:55 PM Aaron Wood via Make-wifi-fast
<make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
>
> That’s an interesting possibility for industrial use-cases where wifi has been used to get flexibility in retrofit installations without needing to pull a hunch if new wires, but has been plagued by interference from heavy equipment.  Although you would need to keep the emitters and receivers clean in the dirtier environments.
>
> This could also be interesting for (some) p2p links, at least those where the IR signal won’t be too adversely impacted by atmospheric dust, fog, and precipitation…
>
> Would it have worked at your yurt lab, Dave? Didn’t that have a few p2p links through the grounds to connect places together?
>
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 4:38 AM Dave Taht via Make-wifi-fast <make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
>>
>> https://www.tomshardware.com/news/li-fi-standard-released
>>
>> --
>> Podcast: https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7058793910227111937/
>> Dave Täht CSO, LibreQos
>> _______________________________________________
>> Make-wifi-fast mailing list
>> Make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net
>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/make-wifi-fast
>
> --
> - Sent from my iPhone.
> _______________________________________________
> Make-wifi-fast mailing list
> Make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/make-wifi-fast