From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi0-x229.google.com (mail-oi0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2A013B25D for ; Fri, 13 May 2016 16:51:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-oi0-x229.google.com with SMTP id x201so189448386oif.3 for ; Fri, 13 May 2016 13:51:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=X1AKrW6IeF6Tpdp4MhqrPk7E7LL4683MCJRtweJWNYc=; b=p3SNIRGwqxDcBGGtYFMeYSjVYSPzbMi9hYrWfyIvSYaWbGA3Pho77oFMc53gioxhKB Vmz1p8x6X7UQXf9Rbv+O76zSHSsaE9weaCHdFf9Hvt4WDaCNs9jt+jvc/19OpFDLjTfi 0RUomtPQjUQvhsjQ+b9CPOowEZ7llDh06fgDJkyKzqx9dWH5bWkoQC0A2E0jweVcDmGE oSMltG+X1eQaiPHOmhMZqdhBN/ccajlgr4pD5UIrgledPlnVCprfXmwogPS/+T0SXVfc o0aANdcOH6uvJqC0ERE1ORpZgvnU364iTT4kFEvj+iX4flyJcbZC0Gf4nyqywIEoDdDY 3TGw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=X1AKrW6IeF6Tpdp4MhqrPk7E7LL4683MCJRtweJWNYc=; b=k/gN3pOnf30M9UWTUa6BdeuJQ46eXErTl1OfIiUlwEpKP9CnZFjmIPYtKeltVEo6/a 34bsGpyRoCwbR4mbX2EMic6r/IUWIfn5QNU2Atcmbve5ql4fxyJOSBF5gU68U1iA900N HxcxSW6fk9plmRumVmBFEXdr6BOZ+FFUHkNqX7TYsNY/AF6hqjV7JF9WDseCydvobn3Y j3mG2muZf1nlrJnY+y9Kg3BHnkpwoNNqPFzENKIEsHlyBH15MvkEiatDKetpXePhPEDm 6SRFHTvvDcmcP1PAoVR8UsTi1VhB5VUJwwvleAKqZ7asUpd3sDGASVb6lK9AhHvqtJfH YKhg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FWe4924rLMuCL+uMVe1qWcBF7kJm43xqY3oF5Dkk37gbVnZndj0kk++GhtaUtvnmk4qCWskycU3Haiyiw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.157.49.7 with SMTP id e7mr5455467otc.63.1463172702328; Fri, 13 May 2016 13:51:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.229.210 with HTTP; Fri, 13 May 2016 13:51:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <871t5bpkc7.fsf@toke.dk> <6ADC1A9D-72C9-47A5-BDC7-94C14ED34379@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 13:51:42 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Aaron Wood Cc: Bob McMahon , make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net, "ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] Diagram of the ath9k TX path X-BeenThere: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 20:51:42 -0000 And for the reason I originally cc'd ath9k-devel on this thread, was merely that I'd wanted to know if the diagram of the ath9k driver's current structure was actually accurate. Is it? http://blog.cerowrt.org/post/wifi_software_paths/ The "make-wifi-fast" mailing list exists merely because keeping up on patch traffic on linux-wireless and elsewhere, is too difficult for many of the people on it (including me!), and we do tend to wax and wane on issues of more theoretical interest. That said, I have a habit of cross-posting that comes from being an ancient decrepit former usenet junkie where topics did engage multiple people, and it's also a way to draw attention to the project here It is *very* annoying in how many posts get bounced off the mailing lists... still.... Arguing in an echo chamber is futile. I am curious, in terms of further out reach, if there are any other good wifi/5g/6lowpan/wireless mailing lists to be on - I'd like in particular to find one for iwl and the mediatek chips, and if anyone is working on fixing up the rpi3's wifi, that would be good too.