From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qt0-x230.google.com (mail-qt0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C7B33B29E for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 08:11:25 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-qt0-x230.google.com with SMTP id k15so279584047qtg.3 for ; Thu, 05 Jan 2017 05:11:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=W8ngEi3/ypFMZjdypVxnHaR/jH0rnFgSaX5TrpWvsjY=; b=MT2AR3Ahiszh+8ibn7JwqucyLf84hpBlDYlKPci6F3RDsrXP7tXl/rEw/GJbAyrf9T CmuKU5EMN1noCp/55MtcOUJxIOH1YEWWs4zdDokVjAkL4UFKtE5944jmZe1LFHZaw3xO /gga2ggNNq22dyfOCRwl2+6CTWnhJH0JUOv0+An60n2TGwuO6nXQMdw+JvkWRega6JDm Zs3u9kmXoQYI7XpyaN35Pbph2VhjPaha6rWqbjHvaHuidEO557wLAYx0GGf3pYrMjO9U zV8oIpd8ABulhPVZvI6s/AIluIVKTStyKxHkQvN9zg4hftO5Rp7NbzWIJYbXmFY9B/sk /LAQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=W8ngEi3/ypFMZjdypVxnHaR/jH0rnFgSaX5TrpWvsjY=; b=J0Tol4c1/DmOv6u5JSZ2w/KpjEE04YJlyBoOxBfFO1VxApc9D+YGN1A1R2t/Dp9XCl 8aZcUrljeEylGlUeQxRnyBWcYNGWTlM0Etzcu6GvdTaI2b6l1Y1tIQW8bGe+QSIKJXeM jnviI6JXQpkL7uaSnalq5h8fUIxlCKiSN5Amv+Jmk1TTkffb99zN4gHwUeIm8G8hPAwg KxxnBMOSOd516HIVyjIBjOnmz6XIHGqpkM6mMaqzPMsMAzb4+R/i2HBBFI28/ZJr50XR kROIfxQbH6PS7mZnw5EV1Q7brS0bjBrolxrtmQ/Ox9p6zp6Akfnl5DavMKQsxpxhTbkY V0Rg== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXL+FCZZnDJNrv6BzFd23DHl5w3VS7NbruU3fC5i5FLp9Qz6Oh+Zl7rPl6rgDcBK+7E6/tbKuwFenQU1oA== X-Received: by 10.237.41.129 with SMTP id o1mr65079845qtd.10.1483621879206; Thu, 05 Jan 2017 05:11:19 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.12.152.197 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 05:11:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <105daa5c-1c51-0b47-b7d1-ff127ad4e4f5@nbd.name> References: <105daa5c-1c51-0b47-b7d1-ff127ad4e4f5@nbd.name> From: Dave Taht Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 05:11:18 -0800 Message-ID: To: Felix Fietkau Cc: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net, LEDE Development List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] ath9k airtime fairness stabiity issues? X-BeenThere: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 13:11:27 -0000 On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 5:02 AM, Felix Fietkau wrote: > On 2017-01-05 13:59, Dave Taht wrote: >> Felix: >> >> Was there a bugreport? (don't see one) >> >> Do you have a specific device or behavior triggering this revert? > Not yet. I'm still collecting information, but since we want to release > soon, and I trust at least some of the users that reported these issues > to me, I decided that airtime fairness is not ready for this release yet. Well in my case I am seeing what I'd been putting down to some ipv6 multicast weirdness (using babel and dnsmasq), particularly over a bridge (I see several bugs on this filed, I'm still scratching my head on what I'm seeing) but otherwise ATF seeeeemed OK on the devices I was testing. (uap-lite, arc= her) I guess it would be too much to hope that some builds are archived enough to a/b, and can assume post jan 4 builds are "- atf"? (I was *just* rolling out a sizeable test on 12 routers, sigh) > - Felix --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht Let's go make home routers and wifi faster! With better software! http://blog.cerowrt.org