From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi0-x233.google.com (mail-oi0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C15573B260; Wed, 11 May 2016 20:28:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-oi0-x233.google.com with SMTP id k142so95372109oib.1; Wed, 11 May 2016 17:28:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=Txz4rD/7YODYrAmCCTeJXds9jztme5NMLxKB61Skoco=; b=0ZK9M/bDiu7na+wVZvq77nX783pLxH1ojuOlsh7HA73mFKZjuV/jhFWLRohcTcdaFM AITCzD+/j3EufsOzx3csQ/w21ipYKLmTZZ3UTTTkwohiMw/bBuSGYxGxuVFUpg3bIXta h8ieJ3nKU+G5q7IYK0x3qkPTCByxjqUZbwDMzVI3J0Nt7JntO5HGlnJhS8DFYacF+Bi5 abiOXJDhQozvEtntjGiKWiPpGzQjS4OSv52XlfM9YSFo/QdvXIPhzYOiPMPRTaARHtpg Ue84wOewRiqj+lZEfffztEPM8tWf7kgJ+SPfcO++gqylnmpiJD8yZnv6ZruSTEfgPtkD EBsA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=Txz4rD/7YODYrAmCCTeJXds9jztme5NMLxKB61Skoco=; b=iMesNxxmQeQXzvSU3LBXZkRySlz8zztvPOPrsYQxbE030sXGISFSXaBPZsHFEefsRx rnvhXIJYrdGqn5Kg1Bl3BvfC4O/V3D6zyPqg9hKYQd81DyBjYgz0wxZL49Pl/UVv4A6W Hh8EyJKM++QvtgRix2zGdm7JK1ONFtz8+G6ZB0gW6HrXUx/wKZWPbCYztyHXsTzc4hbR P9G/EY2Dycm7u9SfKeogBG2dnWRW/l2KG7Od0Tj1FQQ4w8sY9P8IEYsZkF6VAg/TFCz9 ZRx7aEgcLf6bi66mtBG2zMaMONvKeJ+54AQmTpAiTO/j2h1pj+swLb3E7KNyZZNFNSdZ tETA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FVV/Hi2wStkrvTEHxBVfKAfJ89/OPQBwVuNqpnzQdo9Q9+0oOUKZxDJ0riVI2ccRbIBnqWEe8A70n0G+g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.157.51.29 with SMTP id f29mr3620813otc.115.1463012910212; Wed, 11 May 2016 17:28:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.229.210 with HTTP; Wed, 11 May 2016 17:28:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 17:28:30 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: "babel-users@lists.alioth.debian.org" Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" , make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] perverse powersave bug with sta/ap mode X-BeenThere: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 00:28:30 -0000 I am going to try this again this weekend. I'd written up some of the contents of the thread here:http://blog.cerowrt.org/post/failing_over_faster And I just posted the follow-on test using the "chip" - which garnered a bit more detail as to how the routes flapped: http://blog.cerowrt.org/post/babel_half_fail/ Any ideas for what variables to better track appreciated.