From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ob0-x231.google.com (mail-ob0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D0633B25E; Wed, 4 May 2016 04:13:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-ob0-x231.google.com with SMTP id n10so17115458obb.2; Wed, 04 May 2016 01:13:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=52y+A9LWR+jx77e3ZdmClcqgqOjyz1bhckOZFmJJt+c=; b=bigXqu0sabN+O02jj3oSFBtOCkJTRSVVvCuzjrqwewrMJQbAN38q4BvuFBWO6jyxMk MWLawf4+VkcX4xgA40fXbGbVqnWG7XBjCkVDUfUp1EMMpoSzfEgpu4GGpT4KXwsLQ/1p OPVfxfY585Ind7zvQ/6ludao0fHk1/7+2FqlUafCnyvhYJ7YCAS2gjjtt3K7dcZR6Oy6 mpCJJAV5aBaRVim3hWKjn+jc0b1IN2BaI8WSz5lLRihy7xQ8yDO9vyV+z7QLVvUha1Qw aopRwWp/zvZU+ykZaMysS4CfvKymRJSVveT5s66+789RNUUW7fOpczqXefd1VylYQMDH 2oag== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=52y+A9LWR+jx77e3ZdmClcqgqOjyz1bhckOZFmJJt+c=; b=SnhSq82WXj6csU8xkmpnP0Xk6/9/6gOfCRvl5OoSJi3+K0zJS7XdJwb0mYCipPWYm1 2rCz5Q7kG0XxZZEdzs27lBz7UKI3gvoZO8o2SX7DsIyjXM06Wn59kI4THglwG3vO2T4w 1G/xliOEeC5HhHD6OhSJIL+FF05CG+C+ydWUQ1+ZcqtugPRgu9OWBPdEIN8NvaBdDGui tMrqlYJ1J8kTbiiAh9DWynLlnY7f9iBh6Vryoo/nfvvF6S4voGQc8caYY7D7pFRzplqk CR5zZ37WsrcN9wTmoB1Tw9dBxRcMtDAowP1pjOFVvVGyhlRV8cEos3MwTV038zuBI6s2 DfLg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FVe+KEBFSnVPvfsnJ8fptqLOOtQ14hOOrjgcWeZfP573NyitopjFtyjm5vNFKnCPUvzR+sURxYTFc1kCA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.232.194 with SMTP id tq2mr1493234oec.52.1462349590798; Wed, 04 May 2016 01:13:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.79.195 with HTTP; Wed, 4 May 2016 01:13:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 11:13:10 +0300 Message-ID: From: Roman Yeryomin To: Dave Taht Cc: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net, "codel@lists.bufferbloat.net" , ath10k Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] iperf3 udp flood behavior at higher rates X-BeenThere: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 08:13:11 -0000 On 4 May 2016 at 11:02, Roman Yeryomin wrote: > On 3 May 2016 at 02:18, Dave Taht wrote: >> to fork the fq_codel_drop discussion a bit... >> >> I have up and running two new boxes[1] that are my hope to be able to >> test ath10k/ath9k hardware with, for this test, using one in the >> middle as a router and a nuc i3 box as the server, all ports pure >> ethernet... there's a switch in the way, too. >> >> On tcp via netperf I get expected ~940 mbits. >> >> On udp via iperf3 (again, all pure ethernet) - in neither case below >> am I seeing any drops in the qdisc itself anywhere on the path, yet am >> only achieving 500mbit. > > That's interesting, I have no problems with UDP over ethernet. > What about TCP with iperf3? > Also what version of iperf3 are you using? Regards, Roman