I'll compile again from the latest sources to test again. Please don't revert the patch because of my report. On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: > Jon Pike writes: > > > Hey Toke... > > > > Did you notice a guy responded to your commit on LEDE-DEV? He's > reporting > > no speed problems on his C2600... This is turning into a head > > scratcher. > > Yeah, that is odd. Not really sure what to do about it at this point; > maybe just leave it in and see if more people complain? > > > I was going to finally get back to this thread and suggest that at > > least the C5/7 special build that rOOt manages on the LEDE forum could > > benefit from this, (uh, except for that pesky lack of latency > > reduction?) after it gets reverted from the nightly. > > > > Now, I'm just wondering what benifits there would be with this. I > > realize I've pretty much forgotten now what kinds of bufferbloat > > reduction and or airtime fairness bits ath10k had before, or would > > have with this. So if you wouldn't mind going over that again, at > > least I'd have the right info to pass along on what the benifits would > > be... assuming it's reccomendable at this point. > > I don't have any ath10k cards in my own testbed, so I don't have a good > dataset for the potential gains. Not sure if someone else on the list > has done comparisons and can share results? > > -Toke > _______________________________________________ > Make-wifi-fast mailing list > Make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/make-wifi-fast >