From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <adriannnpopescu@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-io0-x234.google.com (mail-io0-x234.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::234])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09CAC3B29E
 for <make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
 Mon, 11 Sep 2017 14:33:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x234.google.com with SMTP id g32so14421318ioj.2
 for <make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
 Mon, 11 Sep 2017 11:33:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :cc; bh=sVvAtXgpPhrPSyPbh0tscdfw4fmBqIQYynfKRhjiqGQ=;
 b=lK6dpNpaKQCHhOZImWVWsD9nQW3czmO7b0nQspnjDpMdG9zfBRjRyLfm0EYZMm2C0y
 +I4Xal5+dq+pPwzibgjheWPpBFHc8eRwXX3Hobv2YAeBZw6eb+eeusmdNiDdNpJ6zjY2
 q6IzrhKXxw4b2WF9FF5VT81YHBKYCCnIOrv301yVnKqSJrWVjLtT9jmNOluXXbtDyagH
 iuNnsMLfIzCk+29P30Tui3mcr3xLyiHhvwv03hX7ihM8WlpEbX0RK8HjbS1RTmMa6aWs
 FqVn5aT0gR3oajxZSJgqyq7urbdVuEbU435sp35B7qVyWT8VxHgSApEKpgALe3iRLRLz
 UYog==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=sVvAtXgpPhrPSyPbh0tscdfw4fmBqIQYynfKRhjiqGQ=;
 b=hNE1nqg1Hnps8aV5UbcnSiXEyvfdi4/kdGMKNpHqzKCGeekrfn16MNVWbC1GmT3j6j
 gXH5FrEBrNuITLS99lyNaWHZ6jQsc8Y9KHOnwqgNayZ5MX9xwFP3u9ccIvMebEAUytS1
 a0NqNLmgA3OiBLcJTWdXbb1KsHUhw28QGWUDQO0gXRRbaqUsDB48Cky2O5RGfbjAQAtC
 o9pJigoTXa8s5+vlWsEQkZiHOrTK6ZiSegM39pW6PYTE8kOL0p5Jrm1hv3/SK0W6vxwq
 FumUFWGV81UiwSywKQZC4xGE947kEEXf+A4ixq+tj/+I75g9gbzkbhQ6/h7OnE2UiTzf
 BMQA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUjUUUO4whACAteNCzqzncUOobiDKuS8s/NEgH5sjbnYSv2cgtza
 SLZuMCXkHdgsg8tJPN13o8KYV1M5lg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QAT6f5IfDsjSREvoBtTJ38RF9RbjselvW/YjPgTODhTlWVWxDWDGezidROLbkTGnWQwrVwv73Bj03UD2bPJdZs=
X-Received: by 10.202.214.143 with SMTP id n137mr13910113oig.231.1505154785414; 
 Mon, 11 Sep 2017 11:33:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.157.1.148 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 11:33:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw6rEUBQEsr2t9YBpCdZbbNFaB7vqhe4NYc38g0qBJNrVA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <mailman.0.1504713601.28249.make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net>
 <CALukJKR_aC2kZjHw+FiBBxnQ8qbH0RNKJ+wVLiV=ysJtb-mOsw@mail.gmail.com>
 <87zia1n0zi.fsf@toke.dk>
 <CAF3M4P2qXRjVa8oDBOqBPtuTd5marCuh4zYtYESxqijAqE-MTw@mail.gmail.com>
 <87mv61mnhw.fsf@toke.dk>
 <CAF3M4P1=yfJPb4HJrOFSTvNqwKcjivjvcZN1EttrSWmm=pry_Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <87k215mn1u.fsf@toke.dk>
 <CAA93jw682Op+oNpv7=sWB6xzVfenhbKTf2UXG7Lx=5HE1ARJLg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAA93jw6rEUBQEsr2t9YBpCdZbbNFaB7vqhe4NYc38g0qBJNrVA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Adrian Popescu <adriannnpopescu@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 21:33:04 +0300
Message-ID: <CAF3M4P0weqFHF4_Pgc8DvHn0+XUhY=Fg0O1ovhRHyLDjdbMTYQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: =?UTF-8?B?VG9rZSBIw7hpbGFuZC1Kw7hyZ2Vuc2Vu?= <toke@toke.dk>, 
 make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net, Jon Pike <jonpike54@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] Make-wifi-fast Digest, Vol 29, Issue 1
X-BeenThere: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: <make-wifi-fast.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/make-wifi-fast>,
 <mailto:make-wifi-fast-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/make-wifi-fast>
List-Post: <mailto:make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:make-wifi-fast-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/make-wifi-fast>,
 <mailto:make-wifi-fast-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 18:33:06 -0000

I've tried a bunch of setups: standard firmware, CT firmware, CT
firmware with the patch and standard firmware with the patch.

Both CT and default firmware have low throughput with this patch.

I can't waste money on more ath10k hardware. QCA9980 was supposed to
be the shiny new thing with push-pull support.

On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 8:09 PM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
> Also, is the candelatech firmware any better here?