From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-io0-x229.google.com (mail-io0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D6523B29E for ; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 08:30:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-io0-x229.google.com with SMTP id j141so24909003ioj.4 for ; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 05:30:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QtIUyrz6o4StMRcpu1pFRhG3AcLfr3wm8PDpURC+QAo=; b=qnDkRVKfWDT0mXZXW9feR0LXxFV+poUzGEOQSyxmfweNEMGZ5pHhfsgYw3xy+6m30J 51KHXNUOuOdom5W2aLqlWrfTaBz79/VouaHgLAef0l4KLIiKE+F+Ud++HBXeX4NI7XWS o9BIy5NmeexF5aexUgEk6eOOAhjx+gxYjbXyDm7p+yXgmV+IpiIUm1Kyb+Mcbw/KMpDO JKfDVTq9QhmzCmYVGWCP+bOrbkIAGNtE7KgiRP6ambB3GxCh5xZGlFCkZL/N1mgsJUAg SLcHrPN8PZCOChPYT4j+jCYHvOE83Cllu1Lc1BldcFRYJyOsvY31sK8NYomZnc5romvQ 23dw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QtIUyrz6o4StMRcpu1pFRhG3AcLfr3wm8PDpURC+QAo=; b=NW/oR07fBbreF0F0VkjlWs+A5K/pFZ1cFOPacKcRHwrcKsiO82x6FBJ9ewHIX06IUY tjz3Ra6a0JR8S7Wl4szCS7ch5UKI/znavIoI+WFzh1wXRTO3m7aRuxD1ezbeLZbQy4Ao YpVq0WM4U1Dhcl+wRL6w24vMcLdmClOpH0/98oWL594qCMoM/1ic95T3KUDcQ9noWGpI NL04s+JiAMD3XSC3UAZWGjOKHQFi8rQ/lnRw27yn5WAIXNKMidEXhQKe92o/+zz3Ar5J LP3FZ6qAU7awykWL3OD/NcXQ9KQQ2CIi0dXUcO3F9frC9Z/o4E2BPmPNtPPv2gPw/4cj c8qA== X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUjl1S0uXqYsLgWBR3O8cKtpjqN1cVSvnLuNVrcVe4UG4bs+AieS NYyidC1jHXF8BxlcCeBp78fqU32Isw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QB7nXHkqIA7qwaPvh9y8Yij3wbMgHKNIi2/hD7SMAvlIfGGgGBpFjdTaKOVe4/nTaEQCn2YY7vyxBWJIO2h3Lg= X-Received: by 10.202.235.80 with SMTP id j77mr11479481oih.220.1505133047813; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 05:30:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.157.1.148 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 05:30:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87mv61mnhw.fsf@toke.dk> References: <87zia1n0zi.fsf@toke.dk> <87mv61mnhw.fsf@toke.dk> From: Adrian Popescu Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 15:30:47 +0300 Message-ID: To: =?UTF-8?B?VG9rZSBIw7hpbGFuZC1Kw7hyZ2Vuc2Vu?= Cc: Jon Pike , make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] Make-wifi-fast Digest, Vol 29, Issue 1 X-BeenThere: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 12:30:48 -0000 We need to put some pressure on QCA to add push-pull support to the firmware. This is MU-MIMO capable hardware which should be able to handle push-pull without breaking a sweat. I have tested this on a brand new Archer C2600. On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen wrote: > Adrian Popescu writes: > >> QCA9980 gets 2-6 Mbps with this patch. I was able to get up to 400-500 >> Mbps without the patch. >> >> The QCA9980 firmware doesn't have push-pull support. > > Ah, bugger. Guess we'll have to drop it, then. Which device is this in? > > -Toke