From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-io0-x22a.google.com (mail-io0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A96E3BA8E for ; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 10:03:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-io0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id n69so46489619ioi.5 for ; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 07:03:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=gr83h+bZBDzmZMLRr1m4WLizEPOwp5c7lcJwfU9b59s=; b=Gkv9UX5XHpvPZ3demfFOMju16L57hOE1FfPIAGGsWQ3hFz0IJIzGwfSAJp0uPbwEzV Vv0ij0SGiIJWQOwp1z0XtGe+/5+en7jmyP3jhyESJ/uB/52Cn6u/k8pWN3VJZimrWKHq 3BSUF7zf++EaAG9MeEvCRfj8/Zn/MJ1YNYmwSHatTvGakVDHp/kGkL/P5wMI+OsYNYxt 678GPQuMCE14YP4iVGOwsRr9269XqkQ0A/daegOrUtf++DouA6kW8pRj6jLJf9djxAcs FCET/3pYh8OePGnqXOMMwaOXLfISVxSyhIFxmy8NC46UiGdj9xjIzkS2KcnyFtjqHjyc NeAQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=gr83h+bZBDzmZMLRr1m4WLizEPOwp5c7lcJwfU9b59s=; b=qnN1K7t3nc3u3kT4Be+Bdleb7HyHp/NtjMdz64T+WmpVDCW/+SyjZPac9BBcSkmcm8 LCzqMWaeJObd8dfgHbiyKiM8OUbr1POddzhzeEYK5+wH7oJ9CBd3PWlsTZX726bL7KSr 0PXXJFUIC34/gKQv9VZERJiIqDYNJO+RSIGW6JurNduiG4btUP6H8hyETxZUWrjnnldV RGiFBgGvS2DjUPTpsG4BUYW5+m35VVkeXfb9B8p895qDE5Vr8JB/BUK6PjU0o5agWgtA NwW+XvmnpYDrdfuwmlS2Q2BK2+zByZUHcJOcJYdhkjLKsc/DmQJIy8Pt/M+FJ6BNIJgj 37Cw== X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUgDfbd+UhelQZf6OFLTZboIQoRyTcfJpI6M5eZVBJVXz4HcfCwG zBJNThP+MkvmUgg29vtHO8aRUPpfRw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QA7Jp/NOAywC0auj30kp7igYKu8Yg9pxqD6V4+jRlAUvA9SscAXyMP3gw3mjMQPj0FJJxuilJTF9clDGyFyZHE= X-Received: by 10.202.102.139 with SMTP id m11mr13685833oik.309.1505225017366; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 07:03:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.157.1.148 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 07:03:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87o9qgutx3.fsf@toke.dk> References: <87zia1n0zi.fsf@toke.dk> <87mv61mnhw.fsf@toke.dk> <87k215mn1u.fsf@toke.dk> <8eb5d9ff-ce18-b314-cfbe-ee4a6815ac9c@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk> <8760comfxj.fsf@toke.dk> <87o9qgutx3.fsf@toke.dk> From: Adrian Popescu Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 17:03:36 +0300 Message-ID: To: =?UTF-8?B?VG9rZSBIw7hpbGFuZC1Kw7hyZ2Vuc2Vu?= Cc: Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant , make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1140f96e779d700558fe82c2" Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] Make-wifi-fast Digest, Vol 29, Issue 1 X-BeenThere: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 14:03:38 -0000 --001a1140f96e779d700558fe82c2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I was testing on QCA9*9*80, not QCA9*8*80. It probably works fine on C7. It doesn't work on the C2600. On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 12:51 PM, Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen wrote: > Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen writes: > > > Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant writes: > > > >> On 11/09/17 19:33, Adrian Popescu wrote: > >>> I've tried a bunch of setups: standard firmware, CT firmware, CT > >>> firmware with the patch and standard firmware with the patch. > >>> > >>> Both CT and default firmware have low throughput with this patch. > >> > >> It's been committed in LEDE > >> https://git.lede-project.org/?p=3Dsource.git;a=3Dcommit;h=3D > 76c3a033f63aba10047a141ccdae303bc9db571e > > > > Ah! So it should be in current nightlies. I'll flash an Archer C7 and > > see if there are any issues. Anyone else care to test out the current > > nightly? :) > > So testing it, I see no difference in throughput on my Archer C7; my > 802.11ac-capable phone gets ~200 Mbps and my 802.11n laptop around 80. > However, there's no improvement in latency under load either. Meh... > > Plot attached. > > -Toke > > > _______________________________________________ > Make-wifi-fast mailing list > Make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/make-wifi-fast > --001a1140f96e779d700558fe82c2 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I was testing on QCA9980, not QCA9880. It pr= obably works fine on C7. It doesn't work on the C2600.

On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at = 12:51 PM, Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen <toke@toke.dk> wrote:<= br>
Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3= =B8rgensen <toke@toke.dk> writes:=

> Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant <kevin@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk> writes:
>
>> On 11/09/17 19:33, Adrian Popescu wrote:
>>> I've tried a bunch of setups: standard firmware, CT firmwa= re, CT
>>> firmware with the patch and standard firmware with the patch.<= br> >>>
>>> Both CT and default firmware have low throughput with this pat= ch.
>>
>> It's been committed in LEDE
>> https://git.lede-project.org/?p=3Dsource.git;a=3Dcommit;h=3D<= wbr>76c3a033f63aba10047a141ccdae303bc9db571e
>
> Ah! So it should be in current nightlies. I'll flash an Archer C7 = and
> see if there are any issues. Anyone else care to test out the current<= br> > nightly? :)

So testing it, I see no difference in throughput on my Archer C7; my=
802.11ac-capable phone gets ~200 Mbps and my 802.11n laptop around 80.
However, there's no improvement in latency under load either. Meh...
Plot attached.

-Toke


_______________________________________________
Make-wifi-fast mailing list
Make-wifi-fast@list= s.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/mak= e-wifi-fast

--001a1140f96e779d700558fe82c2--