From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-x233.google.com (mail-wm0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C82A3BA8D for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 13:53:38 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-wm0-x233.google.com with SMTP id t79so496258787wmt.0 for ; Thu, 05 Jan 2017 10:53:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=fd7dMEb9tHRzw8aqrlToo1B8sNelJv5W9iAoTbBvL+E=; b=H/oOetezFrpYDOpw84fdDFsAObPl+VUEvSVcR9KaPIKI/XevMJ8j7n3/ROTMXitAai 12ojPWQ0HvXlcIorV7SQljq1VenxwZN+zI6jcuUKBHQdGgKdlIPahpAu0pO64Vi587PF lQ5jk3PEzYd6MIl7b0XOdluIQ23MB1bRNrIJmiu7noK72K7d1t2wAmEZKtV8qt1dSqkm lLVgjpFsMw55BrhYqiq69gaN6m2lzDW25bW0Be92bBEUxaUhZSpB+84NLE82wLq1GyD8 351WJZRkgAiQtaaliRQhPrPoBKhR6EAgoE7LLBFg9YhsSUxc+FO5P/dY8sVyRKAYdgPy Dbfg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=fd7dMEb9tHRzw8aqrlToo1B8sNelJv5W9iAoTbBvL+E=; b=FCQ8YyWFCsSmuNGk04ZHKzJO862V6tEHSGM5Tbv5ArhIiGoe3eD02J+YmGn5z0r1wT srVws/uJKbXAhI9KjTe8W4gXaMN7T9eaMi5KC5JAqHQwEUV7EdvJPvdwPi4CUAM7NFc1 wglq5A4IB4tEcQqpzd/+IaRMzuVeh+T1YO4n9WkFIhWxxktl5j640Jrr+tjQZ1IAlHvV iKDgo+lBkLeQVzD/Jd7u3zRwIgAllDDKN4/t3P6x12UcTCj4NZzyFHmg1x5u2Hw0XkET aih3BIjWiDFWfaY53YIllQAN85J/13v/B+Cip1gF3QZ+dDAc+p91aFJnstUxo5CRKJt2 yglA== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXLOEc/I0x6GnV9zV7Bh4mknCY7hp585Lwu6e3ogrZeNhtehmDmsFWUjoHqgaF4QBUcurhptBETFVKzFtw== X-Received: by 10.28.23.16 with SMTP id 16mr67577254wmx.134.1483642417490; Thu, 05 Jan 2017 10:53:37 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.69.139 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 10:53:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <02b7e6c4-0368-93b7-4833-88d685594f99@nbd.name> References: <46229222-ccb9-549d-578d-a8f4c9b83de4@nbd.name> <1431268961.444746.1483629477614@mail.yahoo.com> <02b7e6c4-0368-93b7-4833-88d685594f99@nbd.name> From: Weedy Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 13:53:16 -0500 Message-ID: To: Felix Fietkau Cc: Dave Taht , "make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net" , LEDE Development List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 10:26:44 -0500 Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] [LEDE-DEV] ath9k airtime fairness stabiity issues? X-BeenThere: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 18:53:38 -0000 I just want to chime in that I have felt no negatives and arguable positives since deploying v1 of the airtime fairness patch. I'm currently on git master from Dec 29th (so after the compat bump and v2 fairness merge) and I want to say my Wi-Fi feels better then my build from v1 timeframe. I got a few laptops (mines ath9k, pretty sure ones intel, and the last ones broadcom), a few phones (qualcomm CPUs/radios), and a couple tablets (broadcom). I even deployed a wireless repeater I made with 2 ath9k cards so wds is turned on too. I would think airtime fairness is not going to be pulled out of master, but I really hope we can still ship it to people in 17.01. If there is anything you want me to try I can do my best to test things.