From: Valent Turkovic <valent@otvorenamreza.org>
To: Noah Causin <n0manletter@gmail.com>
Cc: Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@tieto.com>,
make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] Experimental ath10k airtime fairness patch?
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 10:04:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGOios55tjve3sPJyYw9CNEa=_G4rF5omHLy7jWNoXepaFO-kg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6b753f5d-1764-335d-8eac-75a957cc7ed2@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1623 bytes --]
Hi guys,
this news is awesome! Aritime fairness is really missing feature.
Has anyone done some tests? What kind of difference do you see with and
without the patch? Has anyone tested the patch with 20+ clients?
Cheers,
Valent.
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 12:59 AM, Noah Causin <n0manletter@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thank you for the patch.
>
>
>
> On 11/15/2016 1:36 PM, Michal Kazior wrote:
>
>> On 14 November 2016 at 18:06, Noah Causin <n0manletter@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I was wondering if there is an experimental airtime fairness patch for
>>> the
>>> ath10k on LEDE.
>>>
>>> I have been using Toke's patch for enabling intermediate queue support on
>>> the ath10k, and it has been working well.
>>>
>> I did some work on that but didn't finish nor publish it.
>>
>> I just dug around my git repo and found something. I can't remember if
>> it was this exactly what I used in the "100 station" thingy[1][2] or
>> not. Attached.
>>
>> Feel free to play around it if you want. It should provide fairness
>> but will degrade peak performance due to delayed firmware aggregation
>> introducing extra idling latency and the naive design.
>>
>> You'll most likely need to rebase it.
>>
>> [1]: http://imgur.com/a/sSn8V
>> [2]: http://www.linuxplumbersconf.com/2016/ocw//system/presentati
>> ons/3963/original/linuxplumbers_wifi_latency-3Nov.pdf
>> page 28, 30
>>
>>
>> Michał
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Make-wifi-fast mailing list
> Make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/make-wifi-fast
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2855 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-17 9:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-14 17:06 Noah Causin
2016-11-15 18:36 ` Michal Kazior
2016-11-16 23:59 ` Noah Causin
2016-11-17 9:04 ` Valent Turkovic [this message]
2016-11-17 15:56 ` Dave Taht
2017-12-14 9:02 Jesse (Jie) Zhang
2017-12-14 9:16 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/make-wifi-fast.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAGOios55tjve3sPJyYw9CNEa=_G4rF5omHLy7jWNoXepaFO-kg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=valent@otvorenamreza.org \
--cc=make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=michal.kazior@tieto.com \
--cc=n0manletter@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox