From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-x230.google.com (mail-wm0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BB2A3B260 for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 04:05:37 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-wm0-x230.google.com with SMTP id f82so131544250wmf.1 for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 01:05:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=otvorenamreza-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=mx3RQ8mb1tpXruxkuG9JCCvYMBA2iqynwxA96zW8Nks=; b=oL6e7aXRTPPzsw8ZZlwAyNczh2hgl6Cxrj6aZ2ok7NPbb3iAnMSpKXtu9Lv1w3+4kt CPuOxkICSICsmI19A8iB2M7xqaIxKtvECVrnGZsxns3NMtI+ymeobEBInYjzX0wmOtID Mhzl0qxjPivTktTTgrgYuHv5gKyQlZotHx7AnkgQhQ5lTr99kxOfQdm6SxhtsVxVhgj5 CKR5wGKfJOOU1vRfoCBGFcJfnE2AgQog0bagzi18NjfmoAY7OTCRyJ987+3c6q0XM/Cd t087dtQaZmB0L7d6Wq6VhpiU14ed7fnetQDkqGtACfuZXAnw3yQ63cZfoK/yMMVZDcPM wAJQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=mx3RQ8mb1tpXruxkuG9JCCvYMBA2iqynwxA96zW8Nks=; b=VonVOMC9qKegNsgbc6z5mUNwymPaUNySyKpmSSb5yZwx84MATV0hiw0wjhQ/WGnaiY RexyeucsZjM3Ty9mkbv4DVR1yQAvOQv4tyferdeyxCfOtNebccHyfx6eKLlEbTp686ZR AgJB0qENtsYj/yPU2BaQWrEsWqjdPh0oY8JSTAWNK/5rWboUkh7Llkw19m9G5Mwc2eJW EeoyQ71KNr1eKIznmMnVCN4F3a1+bcnrkbtqSLeplSwvjrVJQpCnnVsoGMETBehK/xKs FjSHG+C62z3aY1Knin7R2qsSrHnPi3l7l8jCHqRmFHtHkBwh+/BP+RzeLViTt+AAgCNv vpyg== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvd4MkRid6wIoPumCPg+dU5g4nwolO8HB0UeRFj8kDhRXmkHxsGZnLY9h/E3nq6htF8oh63+MudPvexRGQ== X-Received: by 10.28.15.5 with SMTP id 5mr15688822wmp.141.1479373536728; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 01:05:36 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.167.136 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 01:04:56 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [93.143.162.109] In-Reply-To: <6b753f5d-1764-335d-8eac-75a957cc7ed2@gmail.com> References: <69119644-7618-0f4a-884a-e01fb1a7edb6@gmail.com> <6b753f5d-1764-335d-8eac-75a957cc7ed2@gmail.com> From: Valent Turkovic Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 10:04:56 +0100 Message-ID: To: Noah Causin Cc: Michal Kazior , make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1147426025ae5905417b7e4c Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] Experimental ath10k airtime fairness patch? X-BeenThere: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 09:05:37 -0000 --001a1147426025ae5905417b7e4c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi guys, this news is awesome! Aritime fairness is really missing feature. Has anyone done some tests? What kind of difference do you see with and without the patch? Has anyone tested the patch with 20+ clients? Cheers, Valent. On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 12:59 AM, Noah Causin wrote= : > Thank you for the patch. > > > > On 11/15/2016 1:36 PM, Michal Kazior wrote: > >> On 14 November 2016 at 18:06, Noah Causin wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I was wondering if there is an experimental airtime fairness patch for >>> the >>> ath10k on LEDE. >>> >>> I have been using Toke's patch for enabling intermediate queue support = on >>> the ath10k, and it has been working well. >>> >> I did some work on that but didn't finish nor publish it. >> >> I just dug around my git repo and found something. I can't remember if >> it was this exactly what I used in the "100 station" thingy[1][2] or >> not. Attached. >> >> Feel free to play around it if you want. It should provide fairness >> but will degrade peak performance due to delayed firmware aggregation >> introducing extra idling latency and the naive design. >> >> You'll most likely need to rebase it. >> >> [1]: http://imgur.com/a/sSn8V >> [2]: http://www.linuxplumbersconf.com/2016/ocw//system/presentati >> ons/3963/original/linuxplumbers_wifi_latency-3Nov.pdf >> page 28, 30 >> >> >> Micha=C5=82 >> > > _______________________________________________ > Make-wifi-fast mailing list > Make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/make-wifi-fast > --001a1147426025ae5905417b7e4c Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi guys,
this news is awesome! Aritime fairness is rea= lly missing feature.

Has anyone done some tests? W= hat kind of difference do you see with and without the patch? Has anyone te= sted the patch with 20+ clients?

Cheers,
Valent.

On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 12:59 AM, Noah Causin <n0manletter@gmail.co= m> wrote:
Thank you for the= patch.



On 11/15/2016 1:36 PM, Michal Kazior wrote:
On 14 November 2016 at 18:06, Noah Causin <n0manletter@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,

I was wondering if there is an experimental airtime fairness patch for the<= br> ath10k on LEDE.

I have been using Toke's patch for enabling intermediate queue support = on
the ath10k, and it has been working well.
I did some work on that but didn't finish nor publish it.

I just dug around my git repo and found something. I can't remember if<= br> it was this exactly what I used in the "100 station" thingy[1][2]= or
not. Attached.

Feel free to play around it if you want. It should provide fairness
but will degrade peak performance due to delayed firmware aggregation
introducing extra idling latency and the naive design.

You'll most likely need to rebase it.

[1]: http://imgur.com/a/sSn8V
[2]: http://www.linuxplumbersconf.com/2016/ocw//system/pr= esentations/3963/original/linuxplumbers_wifi_latency-3Nov.pdf=
page 28, 30


Micha=C5=82

_______________________________________________
Make-wifi-fast mailing list
M= ake-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/mak= e-wifi-fast

--001a1147426025ae5905417b7e4c--