From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qk0-x22a.google.com (mail-qk0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67ED33CB53 for ; Sun, 11 Feb 2018 14:33:00 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-qk0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id h186so3949934qke.8 for ; Sun, 11 Feb 2018 11:33:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=H817saMRaEDLjxOackoRVvkxKImWmhVb7bAVPk5zNew=; b=iUhHZk4V9qeM+aa52GFaWKh2tsEFvnd0yFLzbw5pVqfTJmd7p6rXD7ej2pL5E2nohj S6ktGl4qjPWFZoDcWqNz2K+TfpFUl0IfciOQwO7wsEbp5GC1A6rXmiBQnmRkOM3JGDBE 1wZlsWmITrx5Y8vwJHENzFeoHUqkYL2Ok1qaV+M8XwhpFCW0dohF+BDmyW41BXw1/Xtx HRLS5MKujaC7wtiAxnu6Gr4SS9HyTq3fvLvxn6DQ1eKwNPyjWwVgrWdPE/4YfQs+1Tu+ iGP9vPJL+ZQleik1FsQdSU7x6uRA6plyiIJuB33XxCKVImteElOuOeKcKmKVqjaZ2IYT SkKg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=H817saMRaEDLjxOackoRVvkxKImWmhVb7bAVPk5zNew=; b=bXs1GfFV+FAUgC/eDv4hnu3NcnocQLyxbMbwNkSM1ymwfzY7rC37ietToGhg45BFTZ RMvYpqiUHdXcn1hDTP9uMiCmLETQgyF5EzSe2AWnlLsAsoE8LbAN+AiTiePR5uEAo8wU rmJm0Wkk95a/ac8qydzacFQAqDUAx4/4iDU7Zs5BOouYhHNn9JKhCjSnq08AkcZSSfTa x1zka5WzNkuOXYNMS6fa1U4st55o0ws9oLdv16Cj1b5qTgedUe2ykPeyhGUd+YYGVQIY YYujfbIs5auOqdzVzAXn6Guaa2n2Kd4uEp6YJZC2xq9WwBqVmFR7FiRo+Uy4/jh7oKf/ GyNg== X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPAxHWoIhFeJIjG1aJhOYPipgi6l2XoHBdC7XtoBDYCXNK4nrerX 0nsLw0hynWERsxK8rOHx5OCfZF02HgePtnMbopc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x226SGpm+BQ9hVaSR7/EHaa182SC0XXOUYr93+/H1yNQ2RRf+6J1zY5b8Y5JPhhvva61aKOnOdzKi5jor3UwcCV0= X-Received: by 10.55.219.1 with SMTP id e1mr14827893qki.151.1518377579784; Sun, 11 Feb 2018 11:32:59 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: gettysjim@gmail.com Received: by 10.12.168.232 with HTTP; Sun, 11 Feb 2018 11:32:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <877erjg000.fsf@toke.dk> References: <87zia1n0zi.fsf@toke.dk> <87mv61mnhw.fsf@toke.dk> <87k215mn1u.fsf@toke.dk> <8eb5d9ff-ce18-b314-cfbe-ee4a6815ac9c@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk> <8760comfxj.fsf@toke.dk> <87o9qgutx3.fsf@toke.dk> <58c8a193-8452-6cd2-3e57-c28309afd858@gmail.com> <877erjg000.fsf@toke.dk> From: Jim Gettys Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2018 14:32:59 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: su2j_4jhQ6USsn-mf7-vv1nmLrA Message-ID: To: =?UTF-8?B?VG9rZSBIw7hpbGFuZC1Kw7hyZ2Vuc2Vu?= Cc: Noah Causin , make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403043ae95c472d800564f4d4ae" Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] ath10k latency under load? X-BeenThere: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2018 19:33:00 -0000 --f403043ae95c472d800564f4d4ae Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I did a bit of test testing on my Ubiquity router some months ago, and it looked like latency was controlled in my (few) tests... I should probably do more testing when air-time-fairness is enabled.... - Jim On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 7:54 AM, Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen wrote: > Noah Causin writes: > > > Last year, mac80211 softqueues were re-enabled for ath10k devices in > > LEDE, which brought back fq_codel support, but did not improve latency > > under load. > > > > Is this latency under load still an issue today? > > Dunno. I do not have any ath10k hardware in my testbed, so have not been > able to run any thorough benchmarks. I hope to remedy that, though, as I > also want to experiment with enabling airtime fairness in ath10k :) > > -Toke > _______________________________________________ > Make-wifi-fast mailing list > Make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/make-wifi-fast > --f403043ae95c472d800564f4d4ae Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I d= id a bit of test testing on my Ubiquity router some months ago, and it look= ed like
latency= was controlled in my (few) tests...=C2=A0

I should probably do more testing when air-time-fairness = is enabled....
= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 -= Jim

=

On Sun, Feb= 11, 2018 at 7:54 AM, Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen &l= t;toke@toke.dk> wrote:
Noah Causin = <n0manletter@gmail.com> = writes:

> Last year, mac80211 softqueues were re-enabled for ath10k devices in > LEDE, which brought back fq_codel support, but did not improve latency=
> under load.
>
> Is this latency under load still an issue today?

Dunno. I do not have any ath10k hardware in my testbed, so have not = been
able to run any thorough benchmarks. I hope to remedy that, though, as I also want to experiment with enabling airtime fairness in ath10k :)

-Toke
_______________________________________________
Make-wifi-fast mailing list
Make-wifi-fast@list= s.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/mak= e-wifi-fast

--f403043ae95c472d800564f4d4ae--