From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ig0-x22d.google.com (mail-ig0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8C903B2F0 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 15:48:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-ig0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id vf5so125840753igb.0 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:48:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eero.com; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=423c69vkcXxfAAt9fqPg7Ye0+nwfN1FqDZM4G/HWZRM=; b=tFrPhHJ1dY8V+WYgrfKX/OPRpnzsx9ztvI6vVsPE9VXWBC7VB/NrRMogxBIaksgNGX jTFFdF5Ln0Xc19gWfoY2YBkFPBYxuue91HFSQvo6E2aEk4mFaOgfak8/0Ue4w/iRSrsi Tfbp2YdWUWBVag8nuSn7xoOMO1lcbeUqSY3+8= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=423c69vkcXxfAAt9fqPg7Ye0+nwfN1FqDZM4G/HWZRM=; b=CZo+PG/PdeZXMz1xSflRB281Bq6GupuP39bpfwHgrbLnrzDB3c+7XRtXK4IFvolAj7 GJ7iRLXZkZdZytJQT4ulH9VhtnERI8sFEP3PqfKtIgDbMIoQw/e0g/1dJMWvboF2TQjG szegVoF6Rwp5cGkt3P8KfDjsIsISvHkJGiQOAKChMfsMmwOIA7khD8bEzZkvVYNLE1zY xwQOELC8LbmgdHNM5s9R2gmlzzEOjws59Dnzb9i2HeKJXMXEWRK8y81rCvzbYS0xlODH S31xTgUSsbe546rMem+KTq/ZPwbYz5kKf8ArcDAh9QnHvEIEJ0sIHGzLV+KkIwSTkB3U /qzw== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJJvbKXa3TLsn56mQElC6vFSnTSoRvxnTPzmm/ql5zebCn9RGK5gMUlveaYslx1wZjbPEFz3EVkw03Uw+HTK X-Received: by 10.50.150.41 with SMTP id uf9mr2645584igb.64.1458157739100; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:48:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.64.125.130 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:48:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20160316185531.GA1771@localhost> References: <1458123478-1795-1-git-send-email-michal.kazior@tieto.com> <20160316185531.GA1771@localhost> From: Jasmine Strong Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:48:39 -0700 Message-ID: To: Bob Copeland Cc: Dave Taht , Network Development , linux-wireless , "ath10k@lists.infradead.org" , "codel@lists.bufferbloat.net" , Michal Kazior , make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11345c0c113546052e2fce2f X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 25 Mar 2016 11:52:32 -0400 Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] [RFCv2 0/3] mac80211: implement fq codel X-BeenThere: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 19:48:59 -0000 --001a11345c0c113546052e2fce2f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 BK usually has 0 txop, so it doesn't do aggregation. On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Bob Copeland wrote: > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 11:36:31AM -0700, Dave Taht wrote: > > That is the sanest 802.11e queue behavior I have ever seen! (at both > > 6 and 300mbit! in the ath10k patched mac test) > > Out of curiosity, why does BE have larger latency than BK in that chart? > I'd have expected the opposite. > > -- > Bob Copeland %% http://bobcopeland.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > ath10k mailing list > ath10k@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k > --001a11345c0c113546052e2fce2f Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
BK usually has 0 txop, so it doesn't do aggregation.

On Wed, Mar 1= 6, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com> wrot= e:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 = at 11:36:31AM -0700, Dave Taht wrote:
> That is the sanest 802.11e queue behavior I have ever seen!=C2=A0 (at = both
> 6 and 300mbit! in the ath10k patched mac test)

Out of curiosity, why does BE have larger latency than BK in that ch= art?
I'd have expected the opposite.

--
Bob Copeland %% http://bobcopeland.com/

_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k=

--001a11345c0c113546052e2fce2f--