From: Bob McMahon <bob.mcmahon@broadcom.com>
To: iPerf User Group <iperf-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Make-Wifi-fast <make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: [Make-wifi-fast] comments on renaming iperf 2 to iperf next generation
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 11:54:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHb6LvpB6tUozmugf7Lx+WghkXETVwR7ht2JLQ9L=k+Hq8E_Lw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1807 bytes --]
Hi All,
It's unfortunate that numbers have been used in iperf naming. Many think
iperf3 is the next version of iperf (or iperf2.) The number in the name
isn't a version number as iperf 2 and iperf 3 are different code bases,
different developers, have different goals, and don't interoperate.
I'm thinking it's a good time to break this number as part of the name and
only use -v for version numbers. In that context, I'm thinking about
renaming iperf 2 to iperf next generation. The "next generation" implies
that are lots of new features around responsiveness and latency.
This proposed name will be used in web sites, etc. The "iperf2" binary will
still just be iperf. I'm also hoping to get an IANA service as 'iperf' that
way any device that supports the iperf 2.1.8 can also advertise
responsiveness support.
Here is an example and proposed updates to sourceforge.
<https://sourceforge.net/projects/iperf2/> My hope is that this will help
clear up the confusion between the two different tools.
Comments?
Bob
--
This electronic communication and the information and any files transmitted
with it, or attached to it, are confidential and are intended solely for
the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain
information that is confidential, legally privileged, protected by privacy
laws, or otherwise restricted from disclosure to anyone else. If you are
not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the
e-mail to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use,
copying, distributing, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of
this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you received this e-mail in error,
please return the e-mail to the sender, delete it from your computer, and
destroy any printed copy of it.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 2022 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 4206 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2022-08-16 18:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-16 18:54 Bob McMahon [this message]
2022-08-16 20:04 ` Sebastian Moeller
2022-08-16 20:30 ` Bob McMahon
[not found] <mailman.590.1660681819.1281.make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net>
2022-08-16 20:54 ` Rich Brown
2022-08-16 21:10 ` Bob McMahon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/make-wifi-fast.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAHb6LvpB6tUozmugf7Lx+WghkXETVwR7ht2JLQ9L=k+Hq8E_Lw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=bob.mcmahon@broadcom.com \
--cc=iperf-users@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox