From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: "Jonathan Morton" <chromatix99@gmail.com>,
make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net,
"ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org" <ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org>,
"Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>
Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] [ath9k-devel] Diagram of the ath9k TX path
Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 20:30:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJ-Vmo=KdM3N04Jbnnisvxa-Ot26ywRyDOr+9fJQDkxHw1dK5g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw5drf2MXGS6jxsY0DBS1ZgmQ3oE5EBhtXTqyZ46vFHGTg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
So:
* the hardware can give us a per-AC transmit opportunity;
* software queuing needs to handle the per-STA transmit opportunity;
* they (and I followed convention after testing) found the "best"
compromise was to hardware queue up to two frames, which we could
probably do slightly more of at higher MCS rates for "reasons", but if
we're getting enough packets come in then if the hardware queues get
drained slower than we can fill them, we naturally aggregate traffic.
So it actually works pretty well in practice. The general aim is to
keep up to ~8ms of aggregates queued, and that's typically two
aggregate frames so we don't bust the block-ack window.
-adrian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-10 3:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-09 11:00 [Make-wifi-fast] " Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2016-05-09 15:35 ` Dave Taht
2016-05-10 2:25 ` Jonathan Morton
2016-05-10 2:59 ` Dave Taht
2016-05-10 3:30 ` Adrian Chadd [this message]
2016-05-10 4:04 ` [Make-wifi-fast] [ath9k-devel] " Dave Taht
2016-05-10 4:22 ` Aaron Wood
2016-05-10 7:15 ` Adrian Chadd
2016-05-10 7:17 ` Adrian Chadd
2016-05-10 3:41 ` [Make-wifi-fast] " David Lang
2016-05-10 4:59 ` Dave Taht
2016-05-10 5:22 ` David Lang
2016-05-10 9:04 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2016-05-11 14:12 ` Dave Täht
2016-05-11 15:09 ` Dave Taht
2016-05-11 15:20 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2016-05-13 17:46 ` Bob McMahon
2016-05-13 17:49 ` Dave Taht
2016-05-13 18:05 ` Bob McMahon
2016-05-13 18:11 ` Bob McMahon
2016-05-13 18:57 ` Dave Taht
2016-05-13 19:20 ` Aaron Wood
2016-05-13 20:21 ` Dave Taht
2016-05-13 20:51 ` Dave Taht
2016-05-13 20:49 ` David Lang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/make-wifi-fast.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJ-Vmo=KdM3N04Jbnnisvxa-Ot26ywRyDOr+9fJQDkxHw1dK5g@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=adrian@freebsd.org \
--cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org \
--cc=chromatix99@gmail.com \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=toke@toke.dk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox