Re: [Make-wifi-fast] 224gBPS LIFI

[Harshal Chhaya <harshal@gmail.com>]

The more things change, the more they remain the same. :)

The original 1997 standard included a physical layer that used light.
It never really took off for various reasons - lower data rate, line
of sight etc.
It's fascinating to see an improved version come back 25 years later :)



On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 1:55 PM Aaron Wood via Make-wifi-fast
<make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
>
> That’s an interesting possibility for industrial use-cases where wifi has been used to get flexibility in retrofit installations without needing to pull a hunch if new wires, but has been plagued by interference from heavy equipment.  Although you would need to keep the emitters and receivers clean in the dirtier environments.
>
> This could also be interesting for (some) p2p links, at least those where the IR signal won’t be too adversely impacted by atmospheric dust, fog, and precipitation…
>
> Would it have worked at your yurt lab, Dave? Didn’t that have a few p2p links through the grounds to connect places together?
>
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 4:38 AM Dave Taht via Make-wifi-fast <make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
>>
>> https://www.tomshardware.com/news/li-fi-standard-released
>>
>> --
>> Podcast: https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7058793910227111937/
>> Dave Täht CSO, LibreQos
>> _______________________________________________
>> Make-wifi-fast mailing list
>> Make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net
>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/make-wifi-fast
>
> --
> - Sent from my iPhone.
> _______________________________________________
> Make-wifi-fast mailing list
> Make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/make-wifi-fast