From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-il1-x129.google.com (mail-il1-x129.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::129]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 938603B2A4; Sat, 2 May 2020 12:37:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-il1-x129.google.com with SMTP id u189so7250959ilc.4; Sat, 02 May 2020 09:37:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=idZltIr/vwdfEgUbND+JHANCm2c/BQLsG3BEWvN09Ug=; b=iHB3HQe/+tlrZz5+0WQD27T8Iy5nPJ7JnxhcXgyo5kv4445Qwil22lNzl8cg+3cxmj V+m8rsBfJ8gjovwYdETW12BHBvsLio9eyGtIyw17QfcCb+gnE6r5pRVo8xE3PzoNlp79 WBxcOZ76S4Hu/cNUsrl0GFy1GbIfQF1gdKnwHYEV8jpx364Te+OtSgTjPmYoxwjg5kxK l3ZfXaE2IsOxQcJc5I29xCfitCCE2k1+r19n/EiFISFcVXLeHEXdXIi7zCprrmifd9IR Oy6hOtAr2u2pS+6Ejs6bjbKPH6tV5JJUAtGtU6IUNXxOtunDpYFFeT1/sqS5OsCnTlef YcEg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=idZltIr/vwdfEgUbND+JHANCm2c/BQLsG3BEWvN09Ug=; b=ep1S2Eyj93z7b3JT6XhoL0MdiUg8/fUsIQZ6Ye8mWBg0P6eQ1X1jPPcu+4RIVP9NXg Xqf0kxYwRZ10brQDCpO5WQdB3GrTg3AkTQ7/7wJALuFdTomAJjLxphF2QUUvfFUI+7r7 LrWkw5abgpu0DwWgKLg162XPtmX8E21U3H++D7uAeux0r+rJ0SGYqTZabEpU/rlkiREA Iw5u8e+hh2Ck4GBc4e89PVQfedkM6ghFVIGMHM/LrDo9yjJZieL7g3O2mi6+eReeJxlM OkQiJvlWaEEFEG/p66qNu8IdmzL/LhOBdyoymHP22QXMZYNCEOuVAsey9QWXFlio003L 6Eqg== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZpSo265LupkfZXH30quyBejeNBE8oLFs5tFwOlWj23Lef1qjeB ly1nu6k07Pr5ZtPun9uAyXZ39lZuFjQDgjajM3o= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypKuoKwsddbEu0ZrjQDRxKhqr6hPuOJFH2P+3gJgXOfF4xIWYA6x2MXsDYnWmsgU8ZFiXBIEjHihXqwBzn7SRDE= X-Received: by 2002:a92:5a5c:: with SMTP id o89mr8982170ilb.47.1588437448137; Sat, 02 May 2020 09:37:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <05410663-5E50-4CF5-8ADE-3BBB985E32B1@gmx.de> <24457.1588370840@localhost> <013601d6201f$04c7db50$0e5791f0$@hanekom.net> In-Reply-To: <013601d6201f$04c7db50$0e5791f0$@hanekom.net> From: Benjamin Cronce Date: Sat, 2 May 2020 11:37:15 -0500 Message-ID: To: Jannie Hanekom Cc: Michael Richardson , Cake List , Sergey Fedorov , bloat , Make-Wifi-fast Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d821a305a4ace9d7" X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 02 May 2020 14:48:02 -0400 Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] [Cake] [Bloat] dslreports is no longer free X-BeenThere: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 May 2020 16:37:28 -0000 --000000000000d821a305a4ace9d7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > Fast.com reports my unloaded latency as 4ms, my loaded latency as ~7ms For download, I show 6ms unloaded and 6-7 loaded. But for upload the loaded shows as 7-8 and I see it blip upwards of 12ms. But I am no longer using any traffic shaping. Any anti-bufferbloat is from my ISP. A graph of the bloat would be nice. On Sat, May 2, 2020 at 9:51 AM Jannie Hanekom wrote: > Michael Richardson : > > Does it find/use my nearest Netflix cache? > > Thankfully, it appears so. The DSLReports bloat test was interesting, but > the jitter on the ~240ms base latency from South Africa (and other parts of > the world) was significant enough that the figures returned were often > unreliable and largely unusable - at least in my experience. > > Fast.com reports my unloaded latency as 4ms, my loaded latency as ~7ms and > mentions servers located in local cities. I finally have a test I can > share > with local non-technical people! > > (Agreed, upload test would be nice, but this is a huge step forward from > what I had access to before.) > > Jannie Hanekom > > _______________________________________________ > Cake mailing list > Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake > --000000000000d821a305a4ace9d7 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> Fast.com reports my unloaded latency= as 4ms, my loaded latency as ~7ms

For download, I show 6ms unloaded and 6-7 loaded. But for upload the load= ed shows as 7-8 and I see it blip upwards of 12ms. But I am no longer using= any traffic shaping. Any anti-bufferbloat is from my ISP. A graph of the b= loat would be nice.

On Sat, May 2, 2020 at 9:51 AM Jannie Hanekom <jannie@hanekom.net> wrote:
Michael Richardson &l= t;mcr@sandelman.ca>:
> Does it find/use my nearest Netflix cache?

Thankfully, it appears so.=C2=A0 The DSLReports bloat test was interesting,= but
the jitter on the ~240ms base latency from South Africa (and other parts of=
the world) was significant enough that the figures returned were often
unreliable and largely unusable - at least in my experience.

Fast.com reports my unloaded latency as 4ms, my loaded latency as ~7ms and<= br> mentions servers located in local cities.=C2=A0 I finally have a test I can= share
with local non-technical people!

(Agreed, upload test would be nice, but this is a huge step forward from what I had access to before.)

Jannie Hanekom

_______________________________________________
Cake mailing list
Cake@lists.= bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
--000000000000d821a305a4ace9d7--