Re: [Make-wifi-fast] hacking on the candelatech and qca ath10k firmware

[Aaron Wood <woody77@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1434 bytes --]

I think you might be mis-reading the box-plots as error-bars (since their
quartile plots).  I'll need to crunch the numbers, but I'm pretty sure that
the fq results are going to show a higher median throughput (and lower
median latency), with a fair bit of significance.  I'll see if I can figure
out how to calculate the SD of the mean (and other quartiles) from the
flent output (I have scripts that can do this for iperf3's json output).

-Aaron

On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 12:09 AM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:

> see: http://blog.cerowrt.org/post/ath10_ath9k_1/
>
> the regular qca firmware survived the rrul better, and seemed to do
> wmm better. (CS6 for example, was fine) Aside from that it was slower
> and more jittery than the candelatech firmware. some pics there. Am
> too tired to write it up right now.
>
> https://github.com/dtaht/blog-cerowrt/tree/master/content/flent/qca-10.2
>
> I guess I gotta go boot into baseline kernels now and pray I haven't
> been deluding myself at these speeds. For all I know everything is
> actually better with those than all these patches.
>
> night
>
> --
> Dave Täht
> Let's go make home routers and wifi faster! With better software!
> http://blog.cerowrt.org
> _______________________________________________
> Make-wifi-fast mailing list
> Make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/make-wifi-fast
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2313 bytes --]