From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-yw0-x235.google.com (mail-yw0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CB2C3B260 for ; Thu, 5 May 2016 13:05:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-yw0-x235.google.com with SMTP id t10so148645083ywa.0 for ; Thu, 05 May 2016 10:05:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=/FUGVWEgL2bjixj9LQEJezR067kwoNfsX0wJ2e50lW8=; b=V14VYaiHOhzJMJUHQpd6Glo3vOu/0ZxmLHte0dQDF/Bar5Bx7KKQuxXoUU2gJ95nRo AqNOWKiRUtK5CUqfnq++uBCaLreqil4dMCV1Mr/L1xug3ZbmdqDsRHxPmoGs4ou+M4VA 390H3e3k+ux4JFvzIuRXyThz5xdydmRuDWdRHlCkm00J2xgDCxqUG3j5fU6LX+F/ENw3 IDVEagTYz9d5rGhdUrdwOhqakGc9CqJiv6LsmDEj1GoCGjnaYp5Z6FlNx/wKIrItyiJj anVR6+PABG2nUbvS+5pjVDxf5z6WxfIdA+Abg8jP4BkxzQMXYVMTcaiBuBz6VtKVv1Qt FVzA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=/FUGVWEgL2bjixj9LQEJezR067kwoNfsX0wJ2e50lW8=; b=U1NxxsQj0FViTLtGdNENgJ3wFVmKXO+R2nZdMVDbxsw/rQm8sIQTEoraeYjcXQBhmh L2Fd0JBXjQe0+PebRQHPi4biX5UtnMM+3FarJjVwJsSnXHVBjVRJfWXrJANbILviZKA8 bnn2IZO1eIu4qn2SL6P4sX/bErMGPKjV0j+3ipjYpx4jabvNJncaI6Ek2hlnYpG2E14F egeJZHUcf8r/rkgz4G8iOkTwXRgI6Ljo5bKz/DPAVPVA7o18EfHkd2Nbry+J9LdwE8JD a+aekiyx6s4kjjbx8FfSQZajZ8spnRuybeYfY53p9KkQ3+qZgwb6R/iDgUjYTW945EPo N60A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FWvluz4S0uYFy0qX60Z388S0LqeX7XUr8U7ugL7lWdDXMeV8VNBkuSljSd44ADYk0VJ7ng8znf1tf5sQA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.176.2.65 with SMTP id 59mr9806104uas.16.1462467951067; Thu, 05 May 2016 10:05:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.103.44.70 with HTTP; Thu, 5 May 2016 10:05:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 5 May 2016 10:05:51 -0700 Message-ID: From: Aaron Wood To: Dave Taht Cc: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113c01d0b80f9505321b5a9f Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] hacking on the candelatech and qca ath10k firmware X-BeenThere: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 May 2016 17:05:51 -0000 --001a113c01d0b80f9505321b5a9f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I think you might be mis-reading the box-plots as error-bars (since their quartile plots). I'll need to crunch the numbers, but I'm pretty sure that the fq results are going to show a higher median throughput (and lower median latency), with a fair bit of significance. I'll see if I can figure out how to calculate the SD of the mean (and other quartiles) from the flent output (I have scripts that can do this for iperf3's json output). -Aaron On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 12:09 AM, Dave Taht wrote: > see: http://blog.cerowrt.org/post/ath10_ath9k_1/ > > the regular qca firmware survived the rrul better, and seemed to do > wmm better. (CS6 for example, was fine) Aside from that it was slower > and more jittery than the candelatech firmware. some pics there. Am > too tired to write it up right now. > > https://github.com/dtaht/blog-cerowrt/tree/master/content/flent/qca-10.2 > > I guess I gotta go boot into baseline kernels now and pray I haven't > been deluding myself at these speeds. For all I know everything is > actually better with those than all these patches. > > night > > -- > Dave T=C3=A4ht > Let's go make home routers and wifi faster! With better software! > http://blog.cerowrt.org > _______________________________________________ > Make-wifi-fast mailing list > Make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/make-wifi-fast > --001a113c01d0b80f9505321b5a9f Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I think you might be mis-reading the box-plots as error-ba= rs (since their quartile plots).=C2=A0 I'll need to crunch the numbers,= but I'm pretty sure that the fq results are going to show a higher med= ian throughput (and lower median latency), with a fair bit of significance.= =C2=A0 I'll see if I can figure out how to calculate the SD of the mean= (and other quartiles) from the flent output (I have scripts that can do th= is for iperf3's json output).

-Aaron

On Thu, May 5, 2016 a= t 12:09 AM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
see: http://blog.cerowrt.org/p= ost/ath10_ath9k_1/

the regular qca firmware survived the rrul better, and seemed to do
wmm better. (CS6 for example, was fine) Aside from that it was slower
and more jittery than the candelatech firmware. some pics there. Am
too tired to write it up right now.

https://github.com/dtaht/blo= g-cerowrt/tree/master/content/flent/qca-10.2

I guess I gotta go boot into baseline kernels now and pray I haven't been deluding myself at these speeds. For all I know everything is
actually better with those than all these patches.

night

--
Dave T=C3=A4ht
Let's go make home routers and wifi faster! With better software!
ht= tp://blog.cerowrt.org
_______________________________________________
Make-wifi-fast mailing list
Make-wifi-fast@list= s.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/make-wif= i-fast

--001a113c01d0b80f9505321b5a9f--