From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi0-x230.google.com (mail-oi0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96F343B2A2 for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 13:46:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-oi0-x230.google.com with SMTP id d132so69388181oib.2 for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 10:46:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=5pBBikV31etjCSeRr7K76l4TtTrca7Z4umL+sEbNSXk=; b=eYTpRrv38VZCcC9bqJmISHxz9NBx9l949Caeu80exQqKIJwtT4U5dYvOED1OgVDIKz IUwkt1KmrAEfvNmhHXECYYe2PnrRSby9zrrfLOm9bn+ZiJj2ueE0e84BJ+xziPmpmCny NqE7Qpe+wnT2U8cuLE0wUhR1dA68PTxbqPhBQX8PS5F09A/U1emDfHlO3v//cPYjjl9T 0YwPfcE0mVNxS+WneASAabtRC0kko2BJDnFvUn/x8TTQoy1OPSDGjiRyg2HSDYLVDbTe sV8s/jycLuLJlhpCgPMylkBXYbNCj3AhLzJ1Q0Pk6QG5AnZw3NO4dSuRcN+Ie/FMP6gh goqw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=5pBBikV31etjCSeRr7K76l4TtTrca7Z4umL+sEbNSXk=; b=I3Uh/HLDLmHosXM5O83HiJwpeNBqo9n6SaQuzFJLQoQsEcRuSghWHXQz/aR/iPWnK0 d0qLBrB3N+mmnDU8ck6vIFu1fTofj2OwotWIMajYRhaAJpkIrFzRs/DMutHwwmOVcfzg gkznlsg5K889xQPSQt3DfsyDyz/arP++LraCABaO6YVRJtaZ3pbWrsuCJ5crjO33+nhS 3NnzQBCiYiHNTvmoiWkKirDPVvY0U1DTwCjCCyz1AAwj0Wexe1RDAHESWfEcyXCsVOaN 7Q6WIShJkdMwDnlD5dZzs1BRX3lm0AFsAcB4bwnrQIbYXsLbVfYRwDRhXEyDNPPRt/pG 5eiw== X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RluIsFapR5PP2oO2blMW32+9O5183Fx9pSFL6sNjFpNR6zitqGKrbVQCMUsp8+AZugMkEcPUGcHufasDg== X-Received: by 10.157.35.166 with SMTP id t35mr1228870otb.210.1476294364700; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 10:46:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.117.69 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 10:46:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <02a3f65a-75bc-a973-0bd7-0b8b02b7bd18@gmail.com> From: Aaron Wood Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 10:46:04 -0700 Message-ID: To: Dave Taht Cc: Noah Causin , make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114941e631279e053eae914e Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] Point to Point AC with FQ_Codel X-BeenThere: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 17:46:05 -0000 --001a114941e631279e053eae914e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 10:40 AM, Dave Taht wrote: > On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Aaron Wood wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 6:39 AM, Noah Causin > wrote: > >> > >> > >> I didn't understand what you meant by "The DSPs are better." > > > > > > The Digital Signal Processors in the 11ac radios are better than the > ones in > > the 11n radios. > > In nearly any given environment, 802.11ac achieves one better mcs rate. > Fully-functional transmit beam-forming increasing the SNR at receive? -Aaron --001a114941e631279e053eae914e Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 10:40 AM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@= gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1= 2, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Aaron Wood <wo= ody77@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 6:39 AM, Noah Causin <n0manletter@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> I didn't understand what you meant by "The DSPs are bette= r."
>
>
> The Digital Signal Processors in the 11ac radios are better than the o= nes in
> the 11n radios.

In nearly any given environment, 802.11ac achieves one better mcs ra= te.

Fully-functional transmit beam-form= ing increasing the SNR at receive?

-Aaron=C2=A0
--001a114941e631279e053eae914e--