From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr0-x22c.google.com (mail-wr0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50D8F3CB40 for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 15:48:32 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-wr0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id s5so11965309wra.0 for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 12:48:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=FUQINdFaUnSXZw87KrKMhhABgbdv0JYsro6Yzh2K2vI=; b=n7QQR39rrK8cs7FpPXXX4FOec40BMAQNg90IFonfAwqojjFPUK3IwStWhOljcWoE5B pAmK5EufCmqUlIJvclydGWqkHPkTH3Y3dCwCiB1/4HHSHYPNWchevfwhMbAWrUfwwDHZ vGfmtJvabrW5ewsbO0I2elTCI4tst14m/LI8icIYtX6wxdjkxg+KYcNA3bk26OXmjINr IwCt9yTdkYQ6Rf5mqN7NZ7H8DyLb5HLhCOsAY4/W5L4qq+GzKIn2myDgvx11ENYrhoEy DOaCC/JKmZC1u8f8fwwefDkAbfw4+942TzmQuLQz0GTXk4l2C4AeOo0nvdxRyTEC8+Zo SAzw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=FUQINdFaUnSXZw87KrKMhhABgbdv0JYsro6Yzh2K2vI=; b=W7dEPLtbcyiG/JKn7u6uTDnDT20XXBfHosbnxcX1hSpNPijEiskjoUW35JPdeM5oQ+ W+3HstWGRMBj/QUCLUT2DPcPOvMeic2lKFcgsGWr5fWzWLt7pb0n5fxEDfyeW6c49qpC 8hau57HrT1YMkY8UNzJAjva/ruHTml2fNNPcHs8UEHMoFcSmZl4qxF40e+FcGqo/tFSw VMPPXtxils52u7o64l5NFy9uz8BZJkPA4zVwqRdCKRtdJ9BGrgjCrBMhZ+0YM7CqmLjP pdWhpoxUSsxZYEqBwPjxdRAQ+2lhYUjOkldUQ4LPHpZ96Qs0NGN6EMQi7wBHv49XzD4q 1SdQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPAnzrymFURIGX9K4Qu8iwe1ks8EwIFp8wu8DeS4C8cYBlW45jw4 9+rB0kjpGxhIOL5FGetFPnykrVKwI9urfTZBZDg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x226WEs4ep9rmOj/AjigaMQiJGtoSSKc109D6GWwkWgkotV2o/UT8WnhhJ4iW1dviPIU4YxZkU9YWdO+rr5evWJ4= X-Received: by 10.223.133.70 with SMTP id 64mr7007066wrh.219.1519332511268; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 12:48:31 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.158.207 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 12:48:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <877er4rfq1.fsf@toke.dk> References: <87fu5t9fdi.fsf@toke.dk> <877er4rfq1.fsf@toke.dk> From: =?UTF-8?B?0JrQuNGA0LjQu9C7INCb0YPQutC+0L3QuNC9?= Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 01:48:00 +0500 Message-ID: To: =?UTF-8?B?VG9rZSBIw7hpbGFuZC1Kw7hyZ2Vuc2Vu?= Cc: Valent Turkovic , make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] Testers wanted for airtime fairness scheduler rework X-BeenThere: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 20:48:32 -0000 Hello. For this moment we make our OpenWrt powered Wi-Fi mesh solution. Looks like UNBT devices with ath9k from the latest Feb commits are working normally. We have some UBNT UniFi devices in our lab and can make additional tests. Best Regards, Lukonin Kirill 2018-02-23 0:23 GMT+05:00 Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen : > Valent Turkovic writes: > >> What do testers need to do? Is there any formal testing procedure or >> just reporting back subjectively - works / doesn't work ? > > The main thing to look for is hangs (no packets transferred from AP to > client) or severe drops in throughput. Ideally, there should be no > change in behaviour before and after this patch set :) > > -Toke > _______________________________________________ > Make-wifi-fast mailing list > Make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/make-wifi-fast