From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ua0-x22b.google.com (mail-ua0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E34413B2A2 for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 13:14:30 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-ua0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id 20so289472903uak.0 for ; Fri, 02 Dec 2016 10:14:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=dlPDXhhEnptW9I29lweso9nIsi8/rQ+UaMCLjAYk8Ps=; b=0MZeIfiPQW70F1/tbdO5/+DC7nJa5JO0+y3MmY3OhyNQTBctqPbRWxkezGC4dhraqj Ed8RK89ycrSCHigfTzMtDsRvGJUo+1JJEzr1WG+/Tl9v0kEPYrdN5ToQJQmaaP4FG5Nf 73L8CcZU0Xq/jp1+wj6aM5UMji6G48Dz/mjxwgqJcrUjn/9x/hiOd/0d6gADE6nSQ5BP CWmNqPC+oRvv8d0MVeKAYNX6WDtPeT8AT8Z8sDs5H2YUjUs7xMKE/nd3aLLGAvgr715h blbF7jNziThP+qaTEGxYworTl/cP0a/YM9IH+tM6xxBzU/NBnbu3TZWdY8qUnmUW5Iri 7AOg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=dlPDXhhEnptW9I29lweso9nIsi8/rQ+UaMCLjAYk8Ps=; b=i8ctt9DNVljTRWgeBgocBRAKvVk/Vdw5tscwqmL+tXvbYkrpAD8A0EkKnLlSYQ/BBb h8gShPhXOz5lYxvvfWEkp2qphm0gfw2xHoMEGxkoKWikmJvxeW6eB4o+Yo9p9jBcz6CZ wlR4tt+v6yW0xMY3oUdurHNA30MAMpWuyhxQm084Nh+TY8qwGgrM2rmVqo0npGE9cI9q BQtaDuRR2x9I7hsU7hcSr8wR6K25dM3SPutfeNyRMq/QkEafCoET4l3eYPrpomSI7y9c M7FFIF4RUHWQTayTvPKNKQ/FTVbEDiuui42iSDnH76mdUPF5xuhmnjDLpCJU/Bst4xV5 eaGw== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC03GR88/YLdn2VqPbmsidzIkZuRm5OMzwWTrKJ36o11ZzJbt1J8fcMevNkVw3uyjOJcwZxBbIGijgFa7jg== X-Received: by 10.159.40.97 with SMTP id c88mr8903777uac.17.1480702469983; Fri, 02 Dec 2016 10:14:29 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.31.59.5 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 10:14:29 -0800 (PST) From: Jon Pike Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2016 10:14:29 -0800 Message-ID: To: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c0483c0bdd5060542b0e8ee Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] Updated LEDE build with airtime patches X-BeenThere: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2016 18:14:31 -0000 --94eb2c0483c0bdd5060542b0e8ee Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello all... Well, with medical issues, and having a busy week, I didn't get back right away. Here's the DSLReports Speedtest runs I took. My results here are pretty variable, so I don't know how trustworthy they are or how worth while to you guys, vs FLENT runs. The lower block is using Toke's 11-18 C7 FW build, the upper block is with the 11-24 build. Upshot, on my Archer C7, both ran for days with no apparent issues, on my home network. Interesting note, I ran both the C7 v2 and the C7 v3, both ran fine. So, if you end up with a v3, it shouldn't be an issue. Further side note, the different configuration of the v3 model, with both 2.4Ghz and 5Ghz on the external "rabbit ears" antennas, seems to have a bit stronger signal on 2.4Ghz on the other end of my house, than the v2 model that has 3 separate, small 2.4Ghz antennas inside the box. Caveat, my testing of that wasn't very thourough.. My overall home network setup is: Cox cable - SB6146 modem - Archer C7 router - various clients. I did testing on a PC plugged directely in a eth port of the C7, to PC's using Netgear Netgear WNA3100 N300, and A6200 AC1200 USB adapters. Below are the links to DSLReports, on the tests. Most have cake, and piece of cake, and Noah's suggested settings, with speed caps of 55 and 5 mbit. My cable is supposed to be 60/6, I see 65 often, with wild speed variation on the UL, settling to 5-6mbits. I have the Speedtest settings set for hi res bufferbloat, test time extended to 20sec, which is about as long as you can go without pushing the start of the test off the end of that graph. Let me know if this is in any way useful, or what I can do to make it more worth looking at. It seems so variable and random, that I wonder about the worth, as well as you don't get a good look at what the latencey is over time, vs FLENT. ------------------------------------------- eth0 to router - no SQM http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6656688 Starts near 60, plateau 64-65 (hits 66) then drops to 52-54 at the 10sec mark. UL hits 18, before falling down to a 4.5-5.5 average Bloat C http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6657058 very similar, but bloat an A this time http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6657916 " Bloat a C this time now C7 V2, with Toke 11-24 FW SQM 55/5 http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6659367 51.2 1.65, bloat B http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6659493 52.4 3.01 bloat A peak of 300-400ms on all including idle? -------------------------------- Earlier tests with Toke's 11-18 FW, SQM 55/5 mbits 2.4Ghz N adapter Netgear WNA3100 N300 adapter http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6440808 http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6440846 http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6440864 2.4Ghz AC adapter Netgear A6200 AC1200 adapter http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6440940 http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6440963 http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6440987 5Ghz AC adapter Netgear A6200 AC1200 adapter http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6441015 http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6441038 http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6441056 http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6441132 (first A grade of the batch) eth1 to C7 http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6441483 http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6441570 http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6441586 ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Jon Pike To: "Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen" Cc: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2016 21:58:46 -0800 Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] Updated LEDE build with airtime patches Wish I wasn't out of town still... I could have got some time with the new one. Had been running the 11-18 build version of yours, on a C7 v2 in my mixed home network enviroment. N devices, AC devices, a semi rogue N range extender, all running WPA2-AES. I did see some occasional large amounts of bloat, most of the time good behavior. Occasional odd, regular thru put drops to 1/4 speed. I mentioned this in earlier posts, have done some more detailed testing since, that's at home and unavailable till I'm home again. You could see a few DSLReports logs in my posts. Hope that helps... --94eb2c0483c0bdd5060542b0e8ee Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello all...

Well, with medical is= sues, and having a busy week,=C2=A0 I didn't get back right away.=C2=A0= Here's the DSLReports Speedtest runs I took.

<= div>My results here are pretty variable,=C2=A0 so I don't know how trus= tworthy they are or how worth while to you guys,=C2=A0 vs=C2=A0 FLENT runs.=
The lower block is using Toke's 11-18 C7 FW build,=C2= =A0 the upper block is with the 11-24 build.

Upshot,=C2= =A0 on my Archer C7,=C2=A0 both ran for days with no apparent issues,=C2=A0= on my home network.=C2=A0 Interesting note,=C2=A0 I ran both the C7 v2 and= the C7 v3,=C2=A0 both ran fine.=C2=A0 So, if you end up with a v3,=C2=A0 i= t shouldn't be an issue.=C2=A0 Further side note,=C2=A0 the different c= onfiguration of the v3 model,=C2=A0 with both 2.4Ghz and 5Ghz on the extern= al "rabbit ears" antennas, seems to have a bit stronger signal on= 2.4Ghz on the other end of my house,=C2=A0 than the v2 model that has 3 se= parate, small 2.4Ghz antennas inside the box.=C2=A0 Caveat,=C2=A0 my testin= g of that wasn't very thourough..

My overall home net= work setup is:=C2=A0 Cox cable - SB6146 modem - Archer C7 router - various = clients.=C2=A0=C2=A0 I did testing on a PC plugged directely in a eth port = of the C7,=C2=A0 to PC's using Netgear Netgear WNA3100=C2=A0 N300, and = A6200 AC1200 USB adapters.

Below are the links= to DSLReports,=C2=A0 on the tests.=C2=A0 Most have cake, and piece of cake= , and Noah's suggested settings, with speed caps of 55 and 5 mbit.=C2= =A0 My cable is supposed to be 60/6,=C2=A0 I see 65 often, with wild speed = variation on the UL, settling to 5-6mbits.

I have the Spe= edtest settings set for hi res bufferbloat,=C2=A0 test time extended to 20s= ec, which is about as long as you can go without pushing the start of the t= est off the end of that graph.

Let me know if this is in = any way useful,=C2=A0 or what I can do to make it more worth looking at.=C2= =A0 It seems so variable and random, that I wonder about the worth,=C2=A0 a= s well as you don't get a good look at what the latencey is over time,= =C2=A0 vs FLENT.

----------------------------------------= ---
eth0 to router=C2=A0=C2=A0 -=C2=A0 no SQM

http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/66= 56688=C2=A0 Starts near 60, plateau 64-65 (hits 66) then drops to 52-54= at the 10sec mark. UL hits 18, before falling down to a 4.5-5.5 average=C2= =A0 Bloat C

= http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6657058=C2=A0 very similar,=C2=A0 b= ut bloat an A this time

http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6657916=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0 "=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 Bloat a C this time

=
now C7 V2, with Toke 11-24 FW=C2=A0 SQM 55/5

http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/66= 59367 51.2 1.65, bloat B

http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6659493 52.4 3.01= =C2=A0 bloat A=C2=A0 peak of 300-400ms=C2=A0 on all including idle?

= --------------------------------
Earlier tests with Toke's 11-= 18 FW,=C2=A0 SQM 55/5 mbits

2.4Ghz N adapter=C2=A0 Netgear WNA3= 100=C2=A0 N300 adapter

http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6440808

http://www.dslreports.com/= speedtest/6440846

http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6440864


2.4Ghz= AC adapter=C2=A0 Netgear A6200 AC1200 adapter

http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6440= 940

http= ://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6440963

http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6440987=

5Ghz AC adapter=C2=A0 Netgear A6200 AC1200 adapter

http://www.dslreports.co= m/speedtest/6441015

http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6441038

http://www.dslreports.com/= speedtest/6441056

http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6441132=C2=A0=C2=A0 (firs= t A grade of the batch)

eth1 to C7

http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6441483

http://ww= w.dslreports.com/speedtest/6441570

http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6441586<= br>

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From:=C2=A0Jon Pike &= lt;jonpike54@gmail.com>
To= :=C2=A0"Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen" <toke@toke.dk>
Cc:=C2=A0make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net
Date= :=C2=A0Fri, 25 Nov 2016 21:58:46 -0800
Subject:=C2=A0Re: [Make-wifi-fast= ] Updated LEDE build with airtime patches

Wish I wasn't out of town still...=C2=A0 I could have got some time with th= e new=20 one.=C2=A0 Had been running the 11-18 build version of yours,=C2=A0 on a C7= v2 in=20 my mixed home network enviroment.=C2=A0 N devices, AC devices,=C2=A0 a semi= rogue N range extender, all running WPA2-AES.

I did see some occasional large amounts of bloat,=C2=A0 most= of=20 the time good behavior.=C2=A0 Occasional odd, regular thru put drops to 1/4= =20 speed.=C2=A0=C2=A0 I mentioned this in earlier posts,=C2=A0 have done some = more=20 detailed testing since,=C2=A0 that's at home and unavailable=C2=A0 till= I'm home=20 again.=C2=A0 You could see a few DSLReports logs in my posts.

Hope that helps...



--94eb2c0483c0bdd5060542b0e8ee--