Re: [Make-wifi-fast] bloated ath10k, extra latency at lower rates?

[Jon Pike <jonpike54@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1249 bytes --]

Somehow, the prior msg didnt get to the list...    I've had a lot going
on,  so havent done detailed testing.  Did a brief test that resulted in a
lot of weird results, which gave the impression the -ct FW had problems and
worse performance than the basic.  Unexpected.

But,  too many variables...   different router FW versions, different C7 HW
versions, etc,  so not conclusive at this point.  I'll get back to it later.

On Sun, Feb 10, 2019, 3:08 PM Jon Pike <jonpike54@gmail.com> wrote:

> Well,  OK to know that it's more expected behavior rather than a bug,  and
> great that there sounds like an improvement is on the way..
>
> And to Dave's comment, have to check my notes,  but am pretty sure the
> master snapshot branch I ran a few weeks ago had a -ct firmware.  Can't
> remember now if I saw the large distance/latency change on that one.  When
> I get a chance I'll try comparing them. Might take a bit, home internet
> access depends on the HW!
>
> On Sun, Feb 10, 2019, 12:40 PM Dave Taht <dave@taht.net wrote:
>
>> Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> writes:
>> >
>> >
>> The C7 has an older version of firmware. It would be interesting to
>> benchmark the -ct version of the firmware.
>>
>>
>>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2398 bytes --]