From: Jon Pike <jonpike54@gmail.com>
To: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: [Make-wifi-fast] bloated ath10k, extra latency at lower rates?
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2019 10:23:42 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALukJKRUe-S7EFm_22AWyFd7pcG8j2EY3jJgtXnLrGkzCCXyGg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1143 bytes --]
This might be a good time to mention an observation I've seen that's
related to this.
I have noticed about the same as reported, 10's down to single digits on
my ath9k radios, and a similar 20ms-30ms on the ath10k's. Thats at high
signal strength and the highest data rates. But, I've also noticed that
it's different if you get farther out in range, and you end up on the
slower signaling speeds.
Under those conditions, I'm seeing the ath9k latency rise only slightly,
maybe to 20-30ms, while the ath10k will go up more drastically, like a
continuous 100-150ms or more. Been meaning to mention it to see if it
should be considered as an issue.
Haven't dug too deeply to quantify this much yet, and have been going thru
different setup changes, versions of OpenWrt, etc which complicates
things.
Current setup is C7's as dumb AP's, with a Zotac x86 box doing routing.
Have had 17.01.6, 18.06.1, 18.06.2, and recent snapshot on these, with
their various vintages of drivers and associated code.
Couldnt tell you as of now if all of the above versions have the behavior
or not. Willing to investigate more if its thought important.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1457 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2019-02-10 18:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-10 18:23 Jon Pike [this message]
2019-02-10 20:30 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-02-10 20:40 ` Dave Taht
[not found] ` <CALukJKSVVQXti=+2QfxUN_44vNU+Cn3co68JvY6_wgCTwS8O6Q@mail.gmail.com>
2019-02-27 6:23 ` Jon Pike
2019-03-03 16:41 ` Adrian Popescu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/make-wifi-fast.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CALukJKRUe-S7EFm_22AWyFd7pcG8j2EY3jJgtXnLrGkzCCXyGg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jonpike54@gmail.com \
--cc=make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox