From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-x22d.google.com (mail-wm0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8787A3BA8E for ; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 01:36:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-wm0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id 13so1904951wmq.2 for ; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 22:36:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=itheA3SAF8STaaGQa1oqEyThCenGW9p0z9GyZmcVfp8=; b=t4uQUb1BVNvUdC6RBnQvV8ebYaukVJgZ4/nZ9bRCYHNUUgOn++dbt85ecDxDmMsmtX 5oAu0kOnv7SmMcJskOUjspOekKsz1USDYPYd9MVxGhHTrrThn6xqTCTYR+CiI7py3ApL yWg5Ax1cJL0UkPz7sXZWjy3SjRh4cUwsMYQc9rDnHzlhFomirN5hY37cSDR+IOH2MlOg S+y57PCDRGbE12zn6s8uJrHKPx9zAOcg6lWzpcr4C3o5t/NEqicTjTSYNhV+xmGRT0mG 3ts+T5HMnFos/VL+bz2vt0sYxQ3M7tMprjRHwhlH9+kf5H8QaMXTwWjSgf+wHg2NutoB m7Hg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=itheA3SAF8STaaGQa1oqEyThCenGW9p0z9GyZmcVfp8=; b=HiZvAME1FeBKA02OAzHzcxzaFcIvaGQq8szoM1asChdLTiKkUvEHmuPQJEj92I3deZ j+OfEzrBQf2IJz41FOBJ4mkMOIsWGlokNa1Iib93o8NxeWgQKdIEJmid3vOUtz3lEy3F rKfoNVzDGHIhCZLoA3D0klT74VqH4U+SORD9hNHfCyr5SbElmELA/09OaUw4VqLiSFEV 1L6XncbGMRVQGOovYjyxprAMcNbgCclroUDi0KIahXS1ADFDnlHpr4U2JYjoX4NqXJ5+ AvGVRrG5s5zThNZFIjuf1MJ5gWMVELj3RzFhfhRuD7Ugc6lW0TOv7eqtrUwr0PbrBk7m Xk7w== X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUjilVv6s00U/hVXYcSvxK/UPLhNaMCDmWOn0PN6Rd7E4pFxzdvw XBdDYBHhx0KMqJOlwKXS9/jgG/R71wdtT/AGS/E= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QDRXcMMlhpzXmoZL4+i7347uTyO+Kqu6tnxNEjVWjqTG1YuVutXiXLFHnz6xwUC7lrcF44CDRm8aTPL7zIpGKY= X-Received: by 10.28.187.214 with SMTP id l205mr365133wmf.9.1505799410084; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 22:36:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.160.230 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 22:36:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.160.230 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 22:36:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Jon Pike Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 22:36:49 -0700 Message-ID: To: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114b137ef0efe70559843e65" Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] Make-wifi-fast Digest, Vol 29, Issue 9 X-BeenThere: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 05:36:51 -0000 --001a114b137ef0efe70559843e65 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hey Toke... Did you notice a guy responded to your commit on LEDE-DEV? He's reporting no speed problems on his C2600... This is turning into a head scratcher. I was going to finally get back to this thread and suggest that at least the C5/7 special build that rOOt manages on the LEDE forum could benefit from this, (uh, except for that pesky lack of latency reduction?) after it gets reverted from the nightly. Now, I'm just wondering what benifits there would be with this. I realize I've pretty much forgotten now what kinds of bufferbloat reduction and or airtime fairness bits ath10k had before, or would have with this. So if you wouldn't mind going over that again, at least I'd have the right info to pass along on what the benifits would be... assuming it's reccomendable at this point. On Sep 13, 2017 9:00 AM, wrote: > Send Make-wifi-fast mailing list submissions to > make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/make-wifi-fast > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > make-wifi-fast-request@lists.bufferbloat.net > > You can reach the person managing the list at > make-wifi-fast-owner@lists.bufferbloat.net > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Make-wifi-fast digest..." > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Make-wifi-fast Digest, Vol 29, Issue 1 > (Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen) > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen" > To: Adrian Popescu > Cc: Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant , > make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net > Bcc: > Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 19:03:24 +0200 > Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] Make-wifi-fast Digest, Vol 29, Issue 1 > > > On 12 September 2017 16:03:36 CEST, Adrian Popescu < > adriannnpopescu@gmail.com> wrote: > >I was testing on QCA9*9*80, not QCA9*8*80. It probably works fine on > >C7. It > >doesn't work on the C2600. > > Ah, right. Bugger. Could you confirm that the latest nightly is broken? > Then I'll ask John to revert the patch... > > -Toke > > > _______________________________________________ > Make-wifi-fast mailing list > Make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/make-wifi-fast > --001a114b137ef0efe70559843e65 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hey Toke...

= Did you notice a guy responded to your commit on LEDE-DEV?=C2=A0 He's r= eporting no speed problems on his C2600... =C2=A0 This is turning into a he= ad scratcher.

I was goin= g to finally get back to this thread and suggest that at least the C5/7 spe= cial build that rOOt manages on the LEDE forum could benefit from this, (uh= , except for that pesky lack of latency reduction?) after it gets reverted = from the nightly.

Now, I= 'm just wondering what benifits there would be with this.=C2=A0 I reali= ze I've pretty much forgotten now what kinds of bufferbloat reduction a= nd or airtime fairness bits ath10k had before, or would have with this.=C2= =A0 So if you wouldn't mind going over that again, =C2=A0at least I'= ;d have the right info to pass along on what the benifits would be... =C2= =A0assuming it's reccomendable at this point.

On Sep 13, 2017 9:00 AM, <<= a href=3D"mailto:make-wifi-fast-request@lists.bufferbloat.net">make-wifi-fa= st-request@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
Send Make-wifi-fast mailing list submissions to=
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 https://lists.buffe= rbloat.net/listinfo/make-wifi-fast
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 make-wifi-fast-request@lists.bufferbloat.net

You can reach the person managing the list at
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 make-wifi-fast-owner@lists.bufferbloat.net

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Make-wifi-fast digest..."

Today's Topics:

=C2=A0 =C2=A01. Re: Make-wifi-fast Digest, Vol 29, Issue 1
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 (Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen)


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From:=C2=A0"Toke H= =C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen" <toke@t= oke.dk>
To:=C2=A0Adrian Popescu <adriannnpopescu@gmail.com>
Cc:=C2=A0Kevin Darbysh= ire-Bryant <kevin@darby= shire-bryant.me.uk>, make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net
Bcc:=C2=A0
Date:=C2= =A0Tue, 12 Sep 2017 19:03:24 +0200
Subject:=C2=A0Re: [Make-wifi-fast] Ma= ke-wifi-fast Digest, Vol 29, Issue 1


On 12 September 2017 16:03:36 CEST, Adrian Popescu <adriannnpopescu@gmail.com> wrote:
>I was testing on QCA9*9*80, not QCA9*8*80. It probably works fine on >C7. It
>doesn't work on the C2600.

Ah, right. Bugger. Could you confirm that the latest nightly is broken? The= n I'll ask John to revert the patch...

-Toke


_______________________________________________
Make-wifi-fast mailing list
Make-wifi-fast@list= s.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/mak= e-wifi-fast
--001a114b137ef0efe70559843e65--