From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-x22d.google.com (mail-wm0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8BE93B29E for ; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 16:12:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-wm0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id 189so11407500wmh.1 for ; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 13:12:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=b/OS54BkGBt3rI9To4tePqjHGtnU29ZYHjlG8luUIqQ=; b=apE4bDC00EaSMT0e/uqAsh6ZQ1SzszYAGnD/lZR20ryUbhaygfw1A89+N3YAELjFNq g7WTQcC/uYombeTybfinyN3KwQUPvhpXdJWkmwnXbYHGGENnWEwyWsLRWfr/ldx5KZv+ 1DQSCADNf2ip/V+SsznmkwdA5ZszIJ2ncYILx23VM/3t4yibVZkepEOcDIfLfGc4nvRl FcOKWMxwPy6+YFKRmqxbzOUDbVNVphrYXCWWykiiIkY81a10Qd9v7pNAMSIOE3UCVGVf eIYdSQs9vZJ6828C/RELobA8WQ/EFBLm7hVofD9gTJSUgvjHLMjZg7d4ahy8OyKcteCY KSpQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=b/OS54BkGBt3rI9To4tePqjHGtnU29ZYHjlG8luUIqQ=; b=dtApCIekmm+mBf/Y7RDHJeHoEo8eHHLLHb/BstjJcwzOYcZBF2kIp5jxVQtaowgpbb sBQezblpxF8dNacTYfWAa1SV+oxd/pDUUWFUza5TNdwFCHhF77ENBPLSEivc7W2VZak0 kjzCZaZvJLIiHEG4HNzRhM/C+oSh73HzR2rHRVoh+n4HSirxEVdVH0jHOp48hcjChLNb DAQPhUA/pa4LSUJTsxQGg/j5sGIZlbVQQgKW6NeEyQp1SXfk5geJi+ifKcoj17Qh49Cp pPZyi2GdUxFMvt9I/tpusNcnijfHfK4PdG+OqrhZyskKuvWXhqDSLW3zZMzbaKC1ykeV 174g== X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUgXjlOogael/Y1StPqHjWV2kadqT1pWnMPVBYCf6dyJNjgdwtXe xrcyw6AofpTkgRzJBZ4hOeVA3vAs+kbjGYZ8Ihw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QBRbw/za9CsHRIH8XjBlAjJOrxYzM6krbEMmKcJK2DaWH/JCbkOf02H3BxBX4iFYphORhpYcKudmLE0DTGPvCk= X-Received: by 10.28.187.214 with SMTP id l205mr8351689wmf.9.1505160756518; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 13:12:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.160.230 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 13:12:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.160.230 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 13:12:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Jon Pike Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 13:12:35 -0700 Message-ID: To: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114b137e38e2990558ef8cc0" Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] Upstream Ath10k FQ_Codel Patch? X-BeenThere: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 20:12:38 -0000 --001a114b137e38e2990558ef8cc0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hmmm, again... Doesn't the C7 have the QCA9880? Noah, what kind of speed do you get on yours? I just checked the OpenWRT hardware page... Seems it does. Checked the C2600, it says it does, but not which dash number version of the chip, if that makes any difference. I would have guessed that if you only got 4-6Mbit on it, you wouldn't consider it working, really... so interested in hearing if Noah is seeing normal speeds somehow. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Adrian Popescu ? To: "Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen" > Cc: Jon Pike >, make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net Bcc: Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 15:30:47 +0300 Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] Make-wifi-fast Digest, Vol 29, Issue 1 We need to put some pressure on QCA to add push-pull support to the firmware. This is MU-MIMO capable hardware which should be able to handle push-pull without breaking a sweat. I have tested this on a brand new Archer C2600. On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen > wrote: > Adrian Popescu > writes: > >> QCA9980 gets 2-6 Mbps with this patch. I was able to get up to 400-500 >> Mbps without the patch. >> >> The QCA9980 firmware doesn't have push-pull support. > > Ah, bugger. Guess we'll have to drop it, then. Which device is this in? > > -Toke ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen" > To: Adrian Popescu > Cc: Jon Pike >, make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net Bcc: Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 14:34:21 +0200 Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] Make-wifi-fast Digest, Vol 29, Issue 1 Adrian Popescu > writes: > We need to put some pressure on QCA to add push-pull support to the > firmware. This is MU-MIMO capable hardware which should be able to > handle push-pull without breaking a sweat. > > I have tested this on a brand new Archer C2600. There's new hardware shipping without this feature? WTF? Putting pressure on QCA is all well and good, but unfortunately it's not something we've had a lot of luck with so far :/ -Toke _______________________________________________ Make-wifi-fast mailing list Make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/make-wifi-fast --001a114b137e38e2990558ef8cc0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hmmm, again...

Doe= sn't the C7 have the QCA9880?=C2=A0 Noah, =C2=A0what kind of speed do y= ou get on yours?

I just checked the OpenWRT hardware page... =C2=A0 Seem= s it does.=C2=A0 Checked the C2600, =C2=A0it says it does, =C2=A0but not wh= ich dash number version of the chip, if that makes any difference.

I wou= ld have guessed that if you only got 4-6Mbit on it, you wouldn't consid= er it working, really... =C2=A0 so interested in hearing if Noah is seeing = normal speeds somehow.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From:= =C2=A0Adrian Popescu <adriannnpopescu@gmail.com?
To= :=C2=A0"Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen" <toke@toke.dk&g= t;
Cc:=C2=A0Jon Pike <jonpike54@gmail.com>,=C2=A0make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net
Bcc:= =C2=A0
Date:=C2=A0Mon, 11 Sep 2017 15:30:47 +0300
Subject:=C2=A0Re: [= Make-wifi-fast] Make-wifi-fast Digest, Vol 29, Issue 1
We need to put so= me pressure on QCA to add push-pull support to the
firmware. This is MU-= MIMO capable hardware which should be able to
handle push-pull without b= reaking a sweat.

I have tested this on a brand new Archer C2600.
=
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen <<= a href=3D"mailto:toke@toke.dk?src=3Dinbox" style=3D"color:rgb(51,103,214)">= toke@toke.dk> wrote:
> Adrian Popescu <adrian= nnpopescu@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> QCA9980 gets 2-6 Mb= ps with this patch. I was able to get up to 400-500
>> Mbps withou= t the patch.
>>
>> The QCA9980 firmware doesn't have = push-pull support.
>
> Ah, bugger. Guess we'll have to drop= it, then. Which device is this in?
>
> -Toke



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From:=C2=A0"Toke H=C3=B8i= land-J=C3=B8rgensen" <toke@toke.dk>
To:=C2=A0Adrian Pope= scu <adriannnpopescu@gmail.com>
Cc:=C2=A0Jon Pik= e <jonpike54@gmail.com>,=C2=A0ma= ke-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net
Bcc:=C2=A0
Date:=C2=A0Mon= , 11 Sep 2017 14:34:21 +0200
Subject:=C2=A0Re: [Make-wifi-fast] Make-wif= i-fast Digest, Vol 29, Issue 1
Adrian Popescu <adriannn= popescu@gmail.com> writes:

> We need to put some pressure = on QCA to add push-pull support to the
> firmware. This is MU-MIMO ca= pable hardware which should be able to
> handle push-pull without bre= aking a sweat.
>
> I have tested this on a brand new Archer C26= 00.

There's new hardware shipping without this feature? WTF?
=
Putting pressure on QCA is all well and good, but unfortunately it'= s not
something we've had a lot of luck with so far :/

-Toke<= br>
_______________________________________________
Make-wifi-fa= st mailing list
Make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferblo<= wbr>at.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/make-wifi-fast
--001a114b137e38e2990558ef8cc0--