From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wj0-x243.google.com (mail-wj0-x243.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c01::243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CEFD3CB3B for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 14:06:05 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-wj0-x243.google.com with SMTP id kp2so37480862wjc.0 for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 11:06:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=gm/7b7HjQLOyrtiTcg/XAZTEdQZlEKNm4lfvj9hnCKc=; b=p1YJtPgH2FUAifpblAmBGsS+ELUjLkxDLumzwhrJjKM1wDkm1Nri7zTBXIU+WUshck rd67NphSJd+F/TN5bxhJXjiXIqrWSsqfCF/FHpk2KaDNhotdHs4qsVxHbeWAsGlfUVsw /SSrQ16xLxtKAa7RfwmV6MS8P4gi69cflxah+kf7s2jlZLjGUo0uTRITYdWOBQMOlvxa IQ4T31eKpqgCjgOCWQ7AbhWg6jmJa6Ya4f+P09HPVKFXFRQXcgwbkRpV0g+zsR9BlFi0 qXph+o5SpsgbCLoMFZyE/vFnAjcq2FbXPl+WgTnchd7/oCuaPrMkjO0Yb83yZoX6h9vK lAMg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=gm/7b7HjQLOyrtiTcg/XAZTEdQZlEKNm4lfvj9hnCKc=; b=U6QT++PYPHeo+XosB5yLV//wQV/Hz5wyll3b44E1Y8QzQio0nXl+en0ePqL1XbXPBk DDO151l/GgdXsUBO9zvJTUnla2ehK9XSX2BkteZ/UE9Wapw2ybJYG5WFz16VMh0bChtM 6sFex06Lnq9dlIodwr5jxqnbMHGlwLesVj6UF/vTUlZxM7Rts1x3bYc3CV0tzKT6agmj DRJclYmVP0ky+oAE/ZTz5gH+jkfFlclHqJPboDIYJPbAvXqzVdikg+RG7XGsn0ARMwdq wlar8dd9EPFLXRS2hwhiDBPs0hfuSoEbsSmW7b1rRWtpMI67Ny7kezyUaAXaYa6Q0W/R geFg== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXLvqKK3uMbYXZE9i+0yTRpB+fzMINuoRKqQf7axyAeoD7nkSFJ172UukT9Yy9MWnsMAhF5n0ufZtKKc3w== X-Received: by 10.194.148.4 with SMTP id to4mr10460862wjb.194.1482433564163; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 11:06:04 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.80.137.84 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 11:06:03 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <877f6vr1on.fsf@toke.dk> From: Jaap Buurman Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 20:06:03 +0100 Message-ID: To: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0118454cfec428054443f53b Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] Airtime fairness patch merged upstream, and the Turris Omnia debloated X-BeenThere: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 19:06:05 -0000 --089e0118454cfec428054443f53b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This is awesome news! This means that it will be included in the first stable release that they have planned in the near future :) Now the following question might sound stupid, but how difficult would it be to apply these airtime fairness principles to Ath10k as well? Is this planned? Or will this be a Ath9k feature only? On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 6:53 PM, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant < kevin@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk> wrote: > > > On 19/12/16 22:31, Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen wrote: > >> The airtime fairness patch for ath9k has been accepted into the mainline >> Linux kernel, and is queued to be merged for 4.11 (i.e. the next merge >> window after the current 4.10 cycle completes). >> >> The patch has also been accepted into LEDE and is currently in Felix' >> staging tree at >> https://git.lede-project.org/?p=3Dlede/nbd/staging.git;a=3Dsummary - so = if >> nothing surprising shows up, it should make it into the regular LEDE >> nightlies before too long :) >> > > It's escaped out of Felix's tree and is now in master. Snapshots will > start to have that as default as the buildbots do their thang. > > Not a bad present really :-) > > _______________________________________________ > Make-wifi-fast mailing list > Make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/make-wifi-fast > --089e0118454cfec428054443f53b Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
This is awesome news! This means that it will be included = in the first stable release that they have planned in the near future :)Now the following question might sound stupid, but how difficult would it= be to apply these airtime fairness principles to Ath10k as well?
Is this planned? Or will this be a Ath9k feature only?

On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 6= :53 PM, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant <kevin@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk= > wrote:
<= br>
On 19/12/16 22:31, Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen wrote:
The airtime fairness patch for ath9k has been accepted into the mainline Linux kernel, and is queued to be merged for 4.11 (i.e. the next merge
window after the current 4.10 cycle completes).

The patch has also been accepted into LEDE and is currently in Felix' staging tree at
https://git.lede-project.org/?p=3Dlede/nbd/staging.git;a=3Dsummary - so if
nothing surprising shows up, it should make it into the regular LEDE
nightlies before too long :)

 It's escaped out of Felix's tree and is now in master.=C2=A0 Snapsh= ots will start to have that as default as the buildbots do their thang.

Not a bad present really :-)

_______________________________________________
Make-wifi-fast mailing list
M= ake-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/mak= e-wifi-fast

--089e0118454cfec428054443f53b--