From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr0-x233.google.com (mail-wr0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BDB13B2A3 for ; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 07:56:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-wr0-x233.google.com with SMTP id u1so53172328wra.2 for ; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 04:56:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=4M4W4wGY2eV59a3bmougn5x0BJX+BhttO4Qj+ZWcGHY=; b=WEldtK/qOA99azYZP7+cgXCsaKWh/sdpaj+5R9cznc3TLjvFh/2K+JffpniFvIRmRj EhmQVO0rOxivbIWk4+HpXlXdgtMsow1S1CJdxOpZdXBkKDX2oeXZGuYZZhR3Ah5W24yW Plkm6h1vHGq6A8FgbcAAPberHgH2o7WxKZtJpt9dyFQnh/CpQk55x6HmaAevDrpihsNX V07pMd5ASDUH6nylYtXE+EgcwY+0ArVaZvgYRHeO+Y4e2Hy6yWfovmzjZC9YYzVv4juq MalaovDV7UVyrPRtEs0unEKEbQAVGqb8gsdHgB/FfWipeGZI8DSKrXaGskkVBInWIcCo q3WQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=4M4W4wGY2eV59a3bmougn5x0BJX+BhttO4Qj+ZWcGHY=; b=Apqzckx9jTtgTsKTob4D0Dc9VFHKXfPlW8JAlzh50VyUbXtxugfblARqs6FOIUjhMW P2Y1xkzy7ze15fQ90rYP914t6Ce6U9i5cix2QySn8SUHepKNbMyiXt/iAkWIWLEe2stR xXQ5n+iENyVLyLupDacF7g04+k6EaDsAfuAnhBHp+GeirBnIG9E9uw4xM2sLNv8D06rx ZJXxDtkU3v9Up1k94S1EmURDQGWPdfSaWlCEN7vffVUv6AFeqIikHflNrkKsaYPLg+JJ xvqJ7kEh4Qtwzt8Z7IEikqXqy1QyreabCRY7KqtnAc6CgtiGoGX6TNDz+CCJHxcTNSRR k0pg== X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H2o6cS3ByJtyNSXFxik8MmWb9ZB9T9H2YRzmB4DxUhzGV79MYDg4+IhP5SJZtZyGughxHIccxDHGd68vQ== X-Received: by 10.28.90.66 with SMTP id o63mr9498222wmb.97.1490615763371; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 04:56:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.80.139.1 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 04:56:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.80.139.1 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 04:56:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <878tnraqn7.fsf@alrua-x1> References: <878tnraqn7.fsf@alrua-x1> From: Jaap Buurman Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 13:56:02 +0200 Message-ID: To: =?UTF-8?B?VG9rZSBIw7hpbGFuZC1Kw7hyZ2Vuc2Vu?= , chromatix99@gmail.com Cc: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11452e2e129187054bb507a6 Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] Major Bufferbloat X-BeenThere: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 11:56:04 -0000 --001a11452e2e129187054bb507a6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thank you very much for the quick replies! I tried two clients, one laptop with the Intel 7265ac chipset (Just to be clear, these tests were done on 2.4ghz n). And another client with an Artheros chipset. I am not entirely sure which one exactly, I can check in a few hours once I get home. Both clients were showing the same behavior. The Intel chipset was using Windows 8.1, while the Artheros chipset was using Windows 10. As a sidenote, I will try out Ubuntu clients as well once I get home. I initially also suspected bloated clients. But both clients showed an A bufferbloat score on an Archer C7 V2 2.4ghz wifi. This was the exact same test as the one in the OP, so with 32 upload streams. Unfortunately, I do not have the Archer anymore, so I cannot repeat the iperf tests. On Mar 27, 2017 13:46, "Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen" wr= ote: > Jaap Buurman writes: > > > Hello all, > > > > I'm seeing major bufferbloat issues on my 2.4ghz network that is run > > on a DIR-860l B1, which uses the MT7602E chip. I am running the latest > > stable LEDE. Strangely, I am only getting bufferbloat issues with a > > high number of concurrent data streams from my wireless-n client to my > > router. An extensive test showing the exact situation in which my > > bufferbloat issues are occuring are found in the 7th post of the > > following thread: > > What chipset/driver is the client running? Sounds like that is bloated? > > -Toke > --001a11452e2e129187054bb507a6 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thank you very much for the quick replies! I tried two cl= ients, one laptop with the Intel 7265ac chipset (Just to be clear, these te= sts were done on 2.4ghz n). And another client with an Artheros chipset. I = am not entirely sure which one exactly, I can check in a few hours once I g= et home. Both clients were showing the same behavior. The Intel chipset was= using Windows 8.1, while the Artheros chipset was using Windows 10. As a s= idenote, I will try out Ubuntu clients as well once I get home.

I initially also suspected bloated client= s. But both clients showed an A bufferbloat score on an Archer C7 V2 2.4ghz= wifi. This was the exact same test as the one in the OP, so with 32 upload= streams. Unfortunately, I do not have the Archer anymore, so I cannot repe= at the iperf tests.

On Mar 27, 2017 13:46, "Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen= " <toke@toke.dk> wrote:
Jaap Buurman <jaapbuurman@gmail.com> writes:

> Hello all,
>
> I'm seeing major bufferbloat issues on my 2.4ghz network that is r= un
> on a DIR-860l B1, which uses the MT7602E chip. I am running the latest=
> stable LEDE. Strangely, I am only getting bufferbloat issues with a > high number of concurrent data streams from my wireless-n client to my=
> router. An extensive test showing the exact situation in which my
> bufferbloat issues are occuring are found in the 7th post of the
> following thread:

What chipset/driver is the client running? Sounds like that is bloated?

-Toke
--001a11452e2e129187054bb507a6--