From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pa0-x235.google.com (mail-pa0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F152B3B25E for ; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 02:27:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pa0-x235.google.com with SMTP id wk8so38349961pab.1 for ; Sat, 17 Sep 2016 23:27:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=H7HqNKT11JvTpShWlf3m4dCtfs9jGZDo0Hvij28HPHY=; b=vIvXb4XtF2UEEDG/bsCDOUJy8t7HHinbRMz6nev7npm3Fcor5wN7jg4CpiSmW+h404 3NsmmGC1SupXAdvJv92Wk3YBidKLiZX/AvWKU6FqciM/ZzUQCtorRvTh47dngL/XAr3T qTASNuG8YbyKKsmh/8NzGWOxFlbhsQxmvGAyxqAfV/iu7fvwnSy2ZrC5zSAC4rAkN/CX TArsWnNbw5IJQX2ArzOy0GSczG+hP/sOjGjysyPoLCK5i62YJbMMt8jHMQKXla7QXjPN hpDcZoeRSAaLD8r65EPe0nf9OpNrgrL3Pa8nmQhrJ22sOVC/CVrfz3G0gr2op6/K8fxs WF8w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=H7HqNKT11JvTpShWlf3m4dCtfs9jGZDo0Hvij28HPHY=; b=IOlnCQ2PRy5e6w6TwlNB1V/KZNV9hKwYMtFFY0o5VDZ+LcIuga93pM2HIfBEhDFZ23 qInHX+B141686bYhP6mgOzZHCgIrZAxjm9mZyX+vBMZKbyadAAXd6ONPpQAkdrvZqx8P miXobmX94gwYVKmuys5H9MdmLbEn907PdO6njpJtuBRrwpcl08Now77fuxNGgwnctthb 4ZeeaeIIjtdnIcUnQg+3vuldA19GNXsAESw3upS9S/q3kzj6vNJ+ZVo+G5Tj/OLnTHZi MqaDNYNAKVTqmTwIjiJhDLZTF/Y2RG8g21ENRuV/5qRPn0KxnrSEBgAhOulAx4QRy90k WwBw== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwPTm4HHL+9ngdthos29Bf+AjXAZOutTWH0B+3DE/p7eKlAfGoZE+hZXNM7KiG/AHU6rwEcikJzgMRS1Pw== X-Received: by 10.66.86.105 with SMTP id o9mr36677909paz.108.1474180023242; Sat, 17 Sep 2016 23:27:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.66.102.70 with HTTP; Sat, 17 Sep 2016 23:27:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <87shsyjupm.fsf@toke.dk> From: Loganaden Velvindron Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 10:27:02 +0400 Message-ID: To: Dave Taht Cc: =?UTF-8?B?VG9rZSBIw7hpbGFuZC1Kw7hyZ2Vuc2Vu?= , make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] crypto-fq bug postmortem is up X-BeenThere: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 06:27:04 -0000 On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Dave Taht wrote: > There does not seem to be a statistically significant difference > there. I would encourage you to use rrul_be instead, as we have not > tackled the hardware queue problem in wifi as yet. > > It's also unclear what you are testing, the wifi or the link itself. > The uplink and downlink on ethernet are? Yes, the uplink and downlink are on ethernet.