From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <michael.yartys@protonmail.com>
Received: from mail-40134.protonmail.ch (mail-40134.protonmail.ch
 [185.70.40.134])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC7D73B2A4
 for <make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
 Mon, 22 Jun 2020 17:14:41 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 21:14:32 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com;
 s=protonmail; t=1592860480;
 bh=qqO6ZNsrKEJuYuVXwnG0K+qz9baPOkV1k+bctp48kAY=;
 h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=HrIb30Uh0YNrD6FTDy3JfuOC6CgE71E8JQ2zT+KqKZbyQWfpmY6EpQCPa5w7NTW5k
 LSevuYZys37lOkb2RadLDqnrloJKXFoTILBLb8cm/XA8423GDD+FlyZEXcxt3XJrO3
 luONbadx5gWOLz091MUUKHHQPaqAv38YBkTNxB5s=
To: Simon Barber <simon@superduper.net>
From: Michael Yartys <michael.yartys@protonmail.com>
Cc: =?utf-8?Q?Toke_H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= <toke@redhat.com>,
 "make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net"
 <make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Reply-To: Michael Yartys <michael.yartys@protonmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] Bufferbloat on Norwegian train wifi
Message-ID: <ICJYwMjbIk-Cj7EAJ6y8m4aJHgtDa2cvAI8pS8JoT4PC_dAAxG70JC2J3uZDubPRIg4m5sr4GwaCdhcSX3gHMxi0vXs2feBoK7MvLPBaWn0=@protonmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <A81112B8-1CA0-41BE-8664-3FD590F8F479@superduper.net>
References: <mailman.607.1592728703.24343.make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net>
 <87tuz3tgaq.fsf@toke.dk>
 <A81112B8-1CA0-41BE-8664-3FD590F8F479@superduper.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=7.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED,
 DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM shortcircuit=no
 autolearn=disabled version=3.4.4
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on mail.protonmail.ch
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 21:14:41 -0000

Wow, those are some truly crappy networks!

I'll try to contact Vy to get them to do something about it. I wonder how m=
uch of this might be due to the equipment on their trains though. I decided=
 to measure the bufferbloat on the LTE network in my neighbourhood, and on =
average I got 300 ms above baseline while running an 8-stream TCP download.=
 Then again, I ran this test with my phone acting as a hotspot, and the res=
ults might be affected by that. Does anybody know if this methodology produ=
ces reliable results? I presume that even the very short peak of 86 Mbps sh=
ouldn't really cause much WiFi-related bufferbloat.

Michael